skip to main content
10.1145/1993886.1993920acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Efficient real root approximation

Published:08 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider the problem of approximating all real roots of a square-free polynomial f. Given isolating intervals, our algorithm refines each of them to a width at most 2-L, that is, each of the roots is approximated to L bits after the binary point. Our method provides a certified answer for arbitrary real polynomials, only requiring finite approximations of the polynomial coefficient and choosing a suitable working precision adaptively. In this way, we get a correct algorithm that is simple to implement and practically efficient. Our algorithm uses the quadratic interval refinement method; we adapt that method to be able to cope with inaccuracies when evaluating f, without sacrificing its quadratic convergence behavior. We prove a bound on the bit complexity of our algorithm in terms of degree, coefficient size and discriminant. Our bound improves previous work on integer polynomials by a factor of deg f and essentially matches best known theoretical bounds on root approximation which are obtained by very sophisticated algorithms.

References

  1. J. Abbott. Quadratic Interval Refinement for Real Roots. Poster presented at the Intern. Symp. on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC 2006), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Basu, R. Pollack, and M.-F. Roy. Algorithms in Real Algebraic Geometry. Springer, 2nd edition, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Berberich, P. Emeliyanenko, and M. Sagraloff. An elimination method for solving bivariate polynomial systems: Eliminating the usual drawbacks. In Workshop on Algorithm Engineering & Experiments (ALENEX), pages 35--47, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. E. Berberich, M. Hemmer, and M. Kerber. A generic algebraic kernel for non-linear geometric applications. Research report 7274, INRIA, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Bus and T.J.Dekker. Two efficient algorithms with guaranteed convergence for finding a zero of a function. ACM Trans. on Math. Software, 1(4):330--345, 1975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Cheng, S. Lazard, L. Peñaranda, M. Pouget, F. Rouillier, and E. Tsigaridas. On the topology of real algebraic plane curves. Mathematics in Computer Science, 4:113--137, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. G. E. Collins and A. G. Akritas. Polynomial Real Root Isolation Using Descartes' Rule of Signs. In Proc. of the 3rd ACM Symp. on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (SYMSAC 1976), pages 272--275. ACM Press, 1976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D.Eppstein, M.S.Paterson, and F.F.Yao. On nearest-neighbor graphs. Discrete and Computational Geometry, 17(3):263--282, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Z. Du, V. Sharma, and C. Yap. Amortized bound for root isolation via Sturm sequences. In Symbolic-Numeric Computation, Trends in Mathematics, pages 113--129. Birkhäuser Basel, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Eigenwillig, M. Kerber, and N. Wolpert. Fast and exact geometric analysis of real algebraic plane curves. In Proc. of the 2007 Intern. Symp. on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC 2007), pages 151--158, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Eigenwillig, L. Kettner, W. Krandick, K. Mehlhorn, S. Schmitt, and N. Wolpert. A Descartes algorithm for polynomials with bit-stream coefficients. In 8th International Workshop on Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing (CASC 2005), volume 3718 of LNCS, pages 138--149, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Kerber. On the complexity of reliable root approximation. In 11th International Workshop on Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing (CASC 2009), volume 5743 of LNCS, pages 155--167. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Kerber and M. Sagraloff. Supplementary material for "Efficient Real Root Approximation", 2011. phhttp://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/~msagralo/apx11.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Mehlhorn, R. Osbild, and M. Sagraloff. A general approach to the analysis of controlled perturbation algorithms. CGTA, 2011. to appear; for a draft, see phhttp://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/~msagralo/cpgeneral.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. V. Y. Pan. Optimal and nearly optimal algorithms for approximating polynomial zeros. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 31(12):97--138, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. V. Y. Pan. Solving a polynomial equation: Some history and recent progress. SIAM Review, 39(2):187--220, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. F. Rouillier and P. Zimmermann. Efficient isolation of polynomial's real roots. Journal of Compututational and Applied Mathematics, 162(1):33--50, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Sagraloff. On the complexity of real root isolation. arXiv:1011.0344v1, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. K. Yap. Fundamental Problems in Algorithmic Algebra. Oxford University Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient real root approximation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ISSAC '11: Proceedings of the 36th international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation
        June 2011
        372 pages
        ISBN:9781450306751
        DOI:10.1145/1993886

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 June 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate395of838submissions,47%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader