skip to main content
10.1145/1998076.1998167acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Analytic potential of data: assessing reuse value

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Realizing the vision of networked data collections and services requires large bodies of scientific data that can be used in new ways. Adapting the concept of epistemological potential, we illustrate an approach for assessing the value of data for reuse in new domains. Two criteria for this analytic potential - integrity and fit-for-purpose - are recognized aspects of data curation, however identifying potential domains of interest for reuse requires knowledge of practices and needs across disciplines. Evaluating analytic potential will become increasingly important for libraries and repositories to make informed decisions about recruitment and curation of data for interdisciplinary science.

References

  1. Hey, T., Tansley, S., Tolle, K. (2009). The 4th paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery. Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA. http://research.microsoft.com/enus/ collaboration/fourthparadigm/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. National Science Board. (2005). Long-lived digital data collections: Enabling research and education in the 21st century. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsb0540/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Choudhury, G.S. & Hanisch, R. (2009, December). Data Conservancy: Building a sustainable system for interdisciplinary scientific data curation and preservation. Ensuring Long-Term Preservation and Adding Value to Scientific and Technical Data. Presentation given at PV 2009 conference, Madrid, Spain..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Long-Term Archive. (2005). Appraisal for accession to the SEDAC LTA. http://sedac.ciesin columbia.edu/lta/Appraisal.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Borgman, C., Wallis J., & Enyedy N. (2007). Little science confronts the data deluge: Habitat ecology, embedded sensor networks, and digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7(1/2), 17--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Faniel, I.M., & Jacobsen, T.E. (2010). Reusing scientific data: How earthquake engineering researchers assess the reusability of colleagues' data. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19(3--4), 355--375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Zimmerman, A. (2007). Not by metadata alone: The use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7(1--2), 5--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hjørland, B. (1997). Information seeking and subject representation: An activity-theoretical approach to information science. Westport, CT : Greenwood.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lord, P., MacDonald, A., Lyon, L., & Giaretta, D. (2004). From data deluge to data curation. Proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, Nottingham, September 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cragin, M.H., Palmer, C.L., Carlson, J.R., & Witt, M. (2010). Data sharing, small science, and institutional repositories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 368(1926), 4023--4038.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Baker, K.S., & Yarmey, L. (2009). Data stewardship: Environmental data curation and a web-of-repositories. International Journal of Digital Curation, 4(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cragin, M.H., Palmer, C.L., & Chao, T.C. (2010). Relating data practices, types, and curation functions: An empirically derived framework. Proceedings of the ASIS&T annual meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, Oct. 22--27, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Bates, M.J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1043--1050. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hjørland, Birger. (1998). Theory and metatheory of information science: A new interpretation. Journal of Documentation 54: 606--62Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Analytic potential of data: assessing reuse value

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          JCDL '11: Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries
          June 2011
          500 pages
          ISBN:9781450307444
          DOI:10.1145/1998076

          Copyright © 2011 Authors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 June 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader