skip to main content
10.1145/2001576.2001734acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Polynomial selection scheme with dynamic parameter estimation in cellular genetic algorithm

Published: 12 July 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Recent study has introduced the powerful selection scheme in cellular genetic algorithm that can produce all ranges of selective pressure. The parameters used in that study, however, are empirically estimated by numbers of experiments. In this study, we propose the idea of performing a parameter estimation from a theoretical perspective. In the concept of maximizing the probability to find the new best solution together with hill-climbing optimization, enabling search for an optimal parameter in each generation. The selection scheme with the optimal parameter yields the numbers of mating that maximizes the probability of finding better solutions. This optimal parameter changes during run and it is adaptive to the behavior of a particular evolution. In order to confirm the capability of this parameter estimation method, we have conducted experiments to compare the manually tuned static parameter and the estimated dynamic parameter obtained from this method. Result from the experiment shows that the algorithm with estimated parameter performed better than the former method, even with the best tuned parameter. Therefore, by applying this parameter estimation to the selection scheme stated at the beginning, we would be able to create a new universal adaptive paradigm for the cellular evolutionary algorithm.

References

[1]
E. Alba and B. Dorronsoro. The exploration/exploitation tradeoff in dynamic cellular genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, 9(2):126--142, 2005.
[2]
E. Alba and J. M. Troya. Cellular evolutionary algorithms: Evaluating the influence of ratio. In PPSN VI: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pages 29--38, London, UK, 2000. Springer-Verlag.
[3]
N. Christofides and E. Benavent. An Exact Algorithm for the Quadratic Assignment Problem on a Tree. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 37(5):760--768, 1989.
[4]
D. E. Goldberg, K. Deb, and J. Horn. Massive multimodality, deception, and genetic algorithms. In PPSN II: Proceedings of the 2th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pages 37--46. R. Manner and B. Manderick, Eds., 1992.
[5]
T. C. Koopmans and M. J. Beckmann. Assignment problems and the location of economic activities. Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 4, Cowles Foundation, Yale University, 1957.
[6]
V. V. Migkikh, A. P. Topchy, E. P. Topchy, V. M. Kureichik, and A. Y. Tetelbaum. Combined genetic and local search algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem. In Proceedings of the SecondAsia-Pacific Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Applications (APGA '00, pages 144--151, 2000.
[7]
A. Misevicius. A fast hybrid genetic algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem. In GECCO '06: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pages 1257--1264, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[8]
C. E. Nugent, T. E. Vollmann, and J. Ruml. An Experimental Comparison of Techniques for the Assignment of Facilities to Locations. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 16(1):150--173, 1968.
[9]
J. Sarma and K. D. Jong. An analysis of the effects of neighborhood size and shape on local selection algorithms. In PPSN IV: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pages 236--244, London, UK, 1996. Springer-Verlag.
[10]
J. Sarma and K. D. Jong. An analysis of local selection algorithms in a spatially structured evolutionary algorithm. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 181--186. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997.
[11]
D. Simoncini, P. Collard, S. Vérel, and M. Clergue. On the influence of selection operators on performances in cellular genetic algorithms. CoRR, abs/0804.0852, 2008.
[12]
D. Simoncini, S. Verel, P. Collard, and M. Clergue. Anisotropic selection in cellular genetic algorithms. In GECCO '06: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pages 559--566, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[13]
D. Simoncini, S. Verel, P. Collard, and M. Clergue. Centric selection: a way to tune the exploration/exploitation trade-off. In GECCO '09: Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pages 891--898, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[14]
M. Tomassini. Spatially Structured Evolutionary Algorithms: Artificial Evolution in Space and Time (Natural Computing Series). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2005.
[15]
J. Vatanutanon, N. Noman, and H. Iba. Polynomial selection: A new way to tune selective pressure. In NaBIC, pages 597--602. IEEE, 2010.

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)Complex and dynamic population structuresSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-013-0994-x17:7(1109-1120)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '11: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
July 2011
2140 pages
ISBN:9781450305570
DOI:10.1145/2001576
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 July 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. adaptive algorithm
  2. cellular genetic algorithm
  3. probability of selection
  4. selection scheme
  5. selective pressure

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

GECCO '11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)Complex and dynamic population structuresSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-013-0994-x17:7(1109-1120)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media