skip to main content
10.1145/2001858.2002084acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Cardiac myocyte model parameter sensitivity analysis and model transformation using a genetic algorithm

Published:12 July 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cardiac arrhythmia is the disruption of the normal electrical rhythm of the heart and is a leading cause of mortality around the world. To study arrhythmogenesis, mathematical models of cardiac myocytes and tissues have been effectively employed to investigate cardiac electrodynamics. However, among individual myocytes, there is phenotypic variability that is dependent on factors such as source location in the heart, genetic variation, and even different experimental protocols. Thus, established cardiac myocyte models constrained by experimental data are often untuned to new phenomena under investigation. In this study, we show direct links to parameter changes and differing electrical phenotypes. First, we present results exploring model sensitivity to physiological parameters underpinning electrical activity. Second, we outline a genetic algorithm based approach for tuning model parameters to fit cardiac myocyte behavior. Third, we use a genetic algorithm to transform one model type to another, relating simulation to experimental data. This model transformation demonstrates the potential of genetic algorithms to extend the utility of cardiac myocyte models by comparing different functional regions in the heart.

References

  1. Chugh, S. S., Reinier, K., Teodorescu, C., Evanado, A., Kehr, E., Al Samara, M., Mariani, R., Gunson, K., Jui, J. Epidemiology of sudden cardiac death: clinical and research implications. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 Nov; 51(3):213--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zaniboni, M., Pollard, A. E., Yang, L., Spitzer, K. W. Beat-to-beat repolarization variability in ventricular myocytes and its suppression by electrical coupling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000 Mar; 278(3):H677--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pastore, J. M., Girouard, S. D., Laurita, K. R., Akar, F. G., Rosenbaum, D. S. Mechanism linking T-wave alternans to the genesis of cardiac fibrillation. Circulation. 1999 Mar 16; 99(10):1385--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Luo, C. H., Rudy, Y. A model of the ventricular cardiac action potential. Depolarization, repolarization, and their interaction. Circ Res. 1991 Jun; 68(6):1501--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Beeler, G. W., Reuter, H. Reconstruction of the action potential of ventricular myocardial fibres. J Physiol. 1977 Jun; 268(1):177--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Luo, C. H., Rudy, Y. A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. I. Simulations of ionic currents and concentration changes. Circ Res. 1994 Jun; 74(6):1071--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Nygren, A., Fiset, C., Firek, L., Clark, J. W., Lindblad, D. S., Clark, R. B., Giles, W. R. Mathematical model of an adult human atrial cell: the role of K+ currents in repolarization. Circ Res. 1998 Jan 9--23; 82(1):63--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hodgkin, A. L., Huxley, A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952 Aug; 117(4):500--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sastry, K. Single and Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm Toolbox in C++ IlliGAL Report No. 2007016. 2007 Jun; (http://illigal.org/category/source-code/)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryant, S. M., Wan, X., Shipsey, S. J., and Hart, G. Regional differences in the delayed rectifier current (ikr and iks) contribute to the differences in action potential duration in basal left ventricular myocytes in guinea-pig. Cardiovasc Res. 1998 Nov; 40(2):322--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Syed, Z., Vigmond, E., Nattel, S., Leon, L. J. Atrial cell action potential parameter fitting using genetic algorithms. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005 Sep; 43(5):561--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cardiac myocyte model parameter sensitivity analysis and model transformation using a genetic algorithm

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '11: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation
          July 2011
          1548 pages
          ISBN:9781450306904
          DOI:10.1145/2001858

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 July 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • tutorial

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader