skip to main content
column

Snap judgement of publication quality: how to convince a dean that you are a good researcher

Published:01 August 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A comprehensive qualitative assessment of a researcher's contribution in a specific narrow discipline takes time and expertise. Given the shortage of both in typical situations, a researcher's productivity is often judged quantitatively by the number of publications, their acceptance ratios, and citation counts that are highly discipline-dependent. We believe such a cursory evaluation is unavoidable and suggest a more intuitive discipline-agnostic approach for perfunctory assessment. We propose a metric called peers' reputation (PR) which ties the selectivity of a publication venue with the reputations of authors' institutions. Briefly, PR conveys the selectivity of a conference with a tuple, say <1/3 , 20>, indicating that 1/3 of the papers at that conference are from the top 20 universities. We compute PR for networking research publication venues, and argue that PR is a better indicator of selectivity than acceptance ratio, and many conferences have similar or better PR than journals. While these insights are not necessarily new to researchers in the networking community, PR metric helps inform a dean or a provost that getting a paper accepted at MobiCom involves competing with researchers from the top 20 US universities.

References

  1. http://www.publitics.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. CHEN, J., AND KONSTAN, J. A. Conference Paper Selectivity and Impact. Communications of ACM 53, 6 (June 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. CONFERENCE ACCEPTANCE STATISTICS. http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/ almeroth/conf/stats/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. MICROSOFT ACADEMIC SEARCH. http://academic.research.microsoft.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/nrc/index.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. US NEWS AND WORLD REPORT: RANKINGS - COMPUTER SCIENCE - GRADUATE SCHOOLS. http://gradschools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduateschools/top-computer-science-schools/rankings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Snap judgement of publication quality: how to convince a dean that you are a good researcher

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review
        ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review  Volume 15, Issue 2
        April 2011
        22 pages
        ISSN:1559-1662
        EISSN:1931-1222
        DOI:10.1145/2016598
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2011 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 August 2011

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • column

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader