skip to main content
10.1145/2019136.2019166acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards variability support for security and dependability patterns: a case study

Published: 21 August 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Security and Dependability (S&D) have become mandatory requirements while engineering embedded systems in some industrial sectors. Typically, S&D requirements are developed ad-hoc for each system, preventing further reuse beyond domain-specific boundaries. In recent times, S&D patterns have been introduced to provide reusable solutions. Those patterns benefit from metamodels and tools based on Model-Driven Engineering. However, those patterns typically need to be slightly adapted in order to be integrated into the target embedded system. In this paper, we introduce the notion of systematic reuse of S&D patterns by means of a product-line infrastructure in order to foster the reuse while engineering S&D embedded systems. This way, the benefits of S&D patterns are spread since their reuse is automated. We illustrate our paper with a S&D voter pattern, which provides dependability properties, namely, reliability and availability. We use it in a railway control system case study with stringent dependability requirements.

References

[1]
D. Batory, J. Neal Sarvela, and A. Rauschmayer. Scaling Step-Wise Refinement. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE), 30(6):355--371, June 2004.
[2]
P. Clements and L. M. Northrop. Software Product Lines - Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
[3]
B. Hamid, N. Desnos, C. Grepet, and C. Jouvray. Model-based security and dependability patterns in RCES: the TERESA approach. In 1st International Workshop on Security and Dependability for Resource Constrained Embedded Systems (SD4RCES), 2010.
[4]
B. Hamid, N. Desnos, C. Jouvray, and S. Trujillo. Security and Dependability Pattern Language for Trusted Embedded Systems Applications. In Draft under review, 2011.
[5]
O. Haugen, B. Møller-Pedersen, J. Oldevik, G. Olsen, and A. Svendsen. Adding Standardized Variability to Domain Specific Languages. In SPLC, 2008.
[6]
K. C. Kang and et al. Feature Oriented Domain Analysis Feasability Study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, November 1990.
[7]
C. W. Krueger. Variation Management for Software Production Lines. In 2nd International Software Product Lines (SPLC 2002), San Diego, California, USA, Aug 19--22, pages 37--48, 2002.
[8]
S. Trujillo, D. Batory, and O. Díaz. Feature Oriented Model Driven Development: A Case Study for Portlets. In ICSE, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Safety, security, and configurable software systemsProceedings of the 25th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A10.1145/3461001.3471147(148-159)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2021
  • (2014)Embedded Systems Security: A Survey of EU Research EffortsSecurity and Communication Networks10.1002/sec.11518:11(2016-2036)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2014

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SPLC '11: Proceedings of the 15th International Software Product Line Conference, Volume 2
August 2011
306 pages
ISBN:9781450307895
DOI:10.1145/2019136
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Pure-Systems: Pure-Systems GmbH
  • Hitachi
  • Siemens
  • Software Eng Inst: Software Engineering Institute
  • Biglever: BigLever Software, Inc.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 August 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. dependability
  2. embedded systems
  3. model driven engineering
  4. pattern
  5. security
  6. variability

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SPLC '11
Sponsor:
  • Pure-Systems
  • Software Eng Inst
  • Biglever
SPLC '11: The 2011 Software Product Line Conference
August 21 - 26, 2011
Munich, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 167 of 463 submissions, 36%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Safety, security, and configurable software systemsProceedings of the 25th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A10.1145/3461001.3471147(148-159)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2021
  • (2014)Embedded Systems Security: A Survey of EU Research EffortsSecurity and Communication Networks10.1002/sec.11518:11(2016-2036)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2014

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media