skip to main content
10.1145/2023607.2023640acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompsystechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparison of Firefly algorithm optimisation, particle swarm optimisation and differential evolution

Published:16 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Evolutionary Computation (EC) is a recent and lively area of study. Some of the recent approaches within EC are particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) and Differential Evolution (DE), while one of the latest to be developed is Firefly Algorithm (FA): all of which can be used in optimisation problems. This paper makes a comparison of the effectiveness of these three methods on a specific optimisation problem, specifically tuning the parameters of a PID controller.

References

  1. Herrero, J. M., et al. 2002. Optimal PID tuning with Genetic Algorithms for Non-Linear process Models. IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jones, K. O. and Bouffet, A. 2008. Comparison of Bees Algorithm, Ant Colony Optimisation, and particle Swarm Optimisation for PID Controller Tuning. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies. pp. IIIA.9-1(6). 2008. ISBN 978-954-9641-52-3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Pham D. T., Ghanbarzadeh A., Koç E., Otri S., Rahim S., and Zaidi M. The Bees Algorithm, A Novel Tool for Complex Optimisation Problems. Proc 2nd Virtual International Conference on Intelligent Production Machines and Systems. 2006, Elsevier (Oxford), pp.454--459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kennedy, J. and R. C. Eberhart. 2001. Swarm Intelligence. Morgan Kaufman Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kennedy, J. and R. C. Eberhart. 1995. Particle Swarm Optimisation. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, IV, pp. 1942--1948.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Storn, R. and K. Price. 1995. Differential Evolution -- A Simple and Efficient Adaptive Scheme for Global Optimisation over Continuous Spaces. Technical Report TR-95-012, ICSI. Available via ftp://ftp.icsi.berkeley.edu/pub/techreports/1995/tr-95012.ps.zGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yang, X. S. 2008. Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms, Luniver Press, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ziegler, J. G. and Nichols, N. B. 1942. Optimum settlings for automatic controllers. ASME Transactions, (Vol. 64), pp. 759--768.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Leidenfrost, R. and Elmenreich, W. 2008. Establishing wireless time-triggered communication using firefly clock synchronization approach. Proceedings of the 2008 International Workshop on Intelligent Solutions in Embedded Systems. pp. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Krishnanand, K. and Ghose, D. 2006. Glowworm swarm based optimization algorithm fr multimodal functions with collective robotics applications. Multiagent and Grid Systems, 2(3), pp. 209--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jumadinova, J. and Dasgupta, P. 2008. Firefly-inspired synchronization for improved dynamic pricing in online markets. Proceedings of the 2008 Second IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems. pp. 402--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Comparison of Firefly algorithm optimisation, particle swarm optimisation and differential evolution

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CompSysTech '11: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies
          June 2011
          688 pages
          ISBN:9781450309172
          DOI:10.1145/2023607

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 June 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate241of492submissions,49%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader