skip to main content
10.1145/2024288.2024339acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi-knowConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Semantically driven social data aggregation interfaces for Research 2.0

Published: 07 September 2011 Publication History

Abstract

We propose a framework to address an important issue in the context of the ongoing adoption of the "Web 2.0" in science and research, often referred to as "Science 2.0" or "Research 2.0". A growing number of people are linked via acquaintances and online social networks such as Twitter1allows indirect access to a huge amount of ideas. These ideas are contained in a massive human information flow [35]. That users of these networks produce relevant data is being shown in many studies [1][2][28][36]. The problem however lies in discovering and verifying such a stream of unstructured data items. Another related problem is locating an expert that could provide an answer to a very specific research question. We are using semantic technologies (RDF2, SPARQL3), common vocabularies(SIOC4, FOAF5, SWRC6) and Linked Data (DBpedia7, GeoNames8, CoLinDa9) [3][4][5] to extract and mine the data about scientific events out of context of microblogs. Hereby we are identifying persons and organization related to them based on entities of time, place and topic. The framework provides an API that allows quick access to the information that is analyzed by our system. As a proof-of-concept we explain, implement and evaluate such a researcher profiling use case. It involves the development of a framework that focuses on the proposition of researches based on topics and conferences they have in common. This framework provides an API that allows quick access to the analyzed information. A demonstration application: "Researcher Affinity Browser" shows how the API supports developers to build rich internet applications for Research 2.0. This application also introduces the concept "affinity" that exposes the implicit proximity between entities and users based on the content users produced. The usability of a demonstration application and the usefulness of the framework itself are investigated with an explicit evaluation questionnaire. This user feedback led to important conclusions about successful achievements and opportunities to further improve this effort.

References

[1]
Reinhardt, W., Ebner, M., Beham, G., and Costa, C. 2009. How people are using Twitter during Conferences. In Hornung-Praehauser, V., Luckmann, M. (Eds.): Creativity and Innovation Competencies on the Web. Proceedings of the 5th EduMedia 2009, Salzburg, 145--156.
[2]
Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng, B. 2007. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA- KDD (2007) workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, 56--65.
[3]
Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., and Ives Z. 2007. DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data. 6th International Semantic Web Conference, Busan, Korea.
[4]
Berners-Lee, T. 2007. Linked Data -- Design Issues. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html (last access: April 2011)
[5]
Bizer C., Cyganiak R., and Heath T. 2007. How to Publish Linked Data on the Web. http://sites.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/pub/LinkedDataTutorial/, (20 July 2007) (last access: April 2011)
[6]
Mejías, U. 2005. A Nomad's Guide to Learning and Social Software. In The Knowledge Tree, Edition online. http://knowledgetree.flexiblelearning.net.au/edition07/html/l a_mejias.html(last access: April 2011)
[7]
Ebner, M., Mühlburger, H., Schaffert, S., Schiefner, M., Reinhardt, W., and Wheeler, S. 2010 Get Granular on Twitter - Tweets from a Conference and their Limited Usefulness 1 for Non-Participants. In Key competences in the knowledge society (KCKS 2010), 102--113.
[8]
Mühlburger, H., Ebner, M., and Taraghi, B 2010. @twitter Try out #Grabeeter to Export, Archive and Search Your Tweets. In Research 2.0 approaches to TEL (2010), 76--85.
[9]
Breslin J., Harth A., Bojärs U., and Decker.S. 2005. Towards Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities. In Proceedings of the Second European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2005), Heraklion (Crete), Greece, (May 29 - June 1).
[10]
Brickley D. and Miller L. 2004. FOAF Vocabulary Specification. Namespace Document, FOAF Project, (2 Sept 2004), http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ (last access: April 2011)
[11]
Bojärs U., Breslin J., and Finn A., Decker S. 2008. Using the Semantic Web, for Linking and Reusing Data Across Web 2.0 Communities. The Journal of Web Semantics, Special Issue on the Semantic Web and Web 2.0.
[12]
Tummarello G., Delbru R., and Oren E. 2007. Sindice.com: weaving the open linked data. In Proceedings of the 6th international semantic web and 2nd Asian conference on Asian semantic web conference (ISWC'07/ASWC'07), (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 552--565.
[13]
Letierce, J., Passant, A., Breslin, J., and Decker, S. 2010. Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In Proceedings of the Web Science Conference, Raleigh, NC, USA, (26--27 April 2010).
[14]
Boyd, D., Golder, S., and Lotan, G. 2010. Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In hicss-43. IEEE: Kauai, HI, (2010).
[15]
Honeycutt, C. and Herring, S. C. 2009. Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1--10.
[16]
Mendes P. N., Kapanipathi, P., and Passant A. 2010. Twarql: Tapping into the Wisdom of the Crowd. Triplification Challenge 2010 at 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems (I-SEMANTICS), Graz, Austria, (1--3 September, 2010).
[17]
Passant, A., Bojars, U., Breslin, J. G., Hastrup, T., Stankovic, M., Laublet, P., et al 2010. An Overview of SMOB 2: Open, Semantic and Distributed Microblogging. In 4th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM, 303--306, (2010).
[18]
Zhao D. and Rosson, M. B. 2009. How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 243--252. DOI=10.1145/1531674.1531710 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.153171
[19]
McFedries, P. 2007, All A-Twitter. In IEEE Spectrum, 84, (October 2007).
[20]
Templeton, M. 2008 Microblogging defined, http://microblink.com/2008/11/11/microbloggingdefined/. (last access: April 2011)
[21]
McGiboney, M.: Keep on tweet'n, http://www.nielsenonline.com/blog/2009/03/20/keep-on-tweetn/, (March 2009). (last access: April 2011)
[22]
Haewoon K., Changhyun, L., Hosung, P., and Moon, S. 2010. What is Twitter a Social Network or News Media? InProceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web (WWW) Conference, http://an.kaist.ac.kr/traces/WWW2010.html (last access: April 2011), April 26--30, Raleigh NC (USA).
[23]
Passant, A., Bojars, U., Breslin, J. G., Hastrup, T., Stankovic, M., Laublet, P., et al 2010. An Overviewof SMOB 2: Open, Semanticand Distributed Microblogging. In 4th International Conference on Weblogs andSocial Media, ICWSM, 303--306.
[24]
Softic, S., Ebner, M., Mühlburger, H., Altmann T., andTaraghi, B. 2010. @twitter Mining #Microblogs Using #Semantic Technologies. InProceedingsof6th Workshop on Semantic Web ApplicationsandPerspectives (SWAP 2010), 1--12, (2010).
[25]
StankovicM., Wagner C., andJovanovic J. 2010. Lookingforexperts?Whatcanlinkeddata do foryou. In proceedingsofLinked Data on the Web Workshop(2010).
[26]
Stankovic M. 2010.Open innovationandsemanticweb: Problem solversearch on linkeddata. iswc2010.semanticweb.org.
[27]
Bizer C., Heath T., Idehen, K., and Berners-Lee T. 2008. Linked data on the web (LDOW2008). In Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1265--1266. DOI=10.1145/1367497.1367760 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1367497.1367760
[28]
Stankovic M., Rowe M., andLaublet P. 2010. Mapping Tweetsto Conference Talks: A Goldmine forSemantics. In Proceedingsofthe 3rd Social Data on the Web Conferece, SDOW2010, collcoatedwith International Semantic Web Conference ISWC2010.
[29]
Cattuto, C., Benz, D., Hotho, A., and Stumme, G. 2008. SemanticGroundingof Tag Relatedness in SocialBookmarking Systems. In Proceedingsofthe 7th International Conference on The Semantic Web (ISWC '08), Amit Sheth, Steffen Staab, Mike Dean, Massimo Paolucci, Diana Maynard, Timothy Finin, andKrishnaprasadThirunarayan (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 615--631. DOI=10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_39 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_39
[30]
Laniado D. and Mika P., 2010. Making sense of twitter. In Proceedings of the 9th international semantic web conference on The semantic web - Volume Part I (ISWC'10), Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Yue Pan, Pascal Hitzler, Peter Mika, and Lei Zhang (Eds.), Vol. Part I. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 470--485.
[31]
Mika, P. 2007. Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. Web Semant. 5, 1 (March 2007), 5--15. DOI=10.1016/j.websem.2006.11.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2006.11.002
[32]
Boyd, D., Golder, S.andLotan, G. 2010.Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: ConversationalAspectsofRetweeting on Twitter. In Proceedingsof HICSS. 2010, 1--10.
[33]
Shinavier, J. 2010. Real-time #SemanticWeb in <= 140 chars. In ProceedingsofLinked Data on the Web 2010, on WWW2010.
[34]
Wagner, C. 2010. ExploringtheWisdomoftheTweets: TowardsKnowledgeAcquisitionfromSocialAwareness Streams. In Proceedingsof Extended Semantic Web Conference 2010, Heraklion, Crete.
[35]
Bernard J. Jansen, Mimi Zhang, Kate Sobel, and AbdurChowdury. 2009. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60, 11 (November 2009), 2169--2188. DOI=10.1002/asi.v60:11http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.v60:11
[36]
Asur S. and Huberman, B. A. 2010. Predicting the Future with Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 01 (WI-IAT '10), Vol. 1. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 492--499. DOI=10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.63 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.63
[37]
Passant, A., Hastrup, T., Bojärs U., Breslin J. 2008. Microblogging: A Semantic Web and Distributed Approach, In Proceedingsof 4th Workshop on Scripting fortheSemantic Web (SFSW2008), Teneriffe, Spain, (2 June, 2008)
[38]
Softic, S., Halb, W., and Taraghi B. 2009. Weaving Social E-learning Platforms Into The Web of Linked Data. In Proceedings of I-SEMANTICS 09 - International Conference on Semantic Systems, Graz, Austria, 559--567.
[39]
Ebner, M., Altmann, T., and Softic, S. 2011. @twitteranalysisof #edmedia10--isthe #informationstreamusableforthe #mass. In Electronic Journal Form@re (2011) 74, 1--11.
[40]
Tao K., Abel F., Gao Q., and Houben G. J. 2011. TUMS: Twitter-based User Modeling Service. In International Workshop on User Profile Data on the Social Semantic Web (UWeb), co-located with Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Heraklion, Greece.
[41]
Li, H., Bhowmick, S. S., and Sun, A. 2011.AffRank: Affinity-driven ranking of products in online social rating networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62: 1345--1359. DOI=10.1002/asi.21555.
[42]
Pintado X. 1995. The affinity browser. Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd., Hertfordshire, 245--272, UK, UK, 1995.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Extraction Patterns to Derive Social Networks from Linked Open Data Using SPARQLInformation10.3390/info1107036111:7(361)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2020
  • (2018)Constructing Differentiated Educational Materials Using Semantic Annotation for Sustainable Education in IoT EnvironmentsSustainability10.3390/su1004129610:4(1296)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2018
  • (2017)Social Semantic SearchInternational Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems10.4018/IJSWIS.201710010813:4(155-180)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Semantically driven social data aggregation interfaces for Research 2.0

                          Recommendations

                          Comments

                          Information & Contributors

                          Information

                          Published In

                          cover image ACM Other conferences
                          i-KNOW '11: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies
                          September 2011
                          306 pages
                          ISBN:9781450307321
                          DOI:10.1145/2024288
                          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                          Publisher

                          Association for Computing Machinery

                          New York, NY, United States

                          Publication History

                          Published: 07 September 2011

                          Permissions

                          Request permissions for this article.

                          Check for updates

                          Author Tags

                          1. Research 2.0
                          2. Science 2.0
                          3. Twitter
                          4. Web 2.0
                          5. linked data
                          6. microblogs
                          7. profiling
                          8. semantic
                          9. social media
                          10. web mining

                          Qualifiers

                          • Research-article

                          Conference

                          i-KNOW '11

                          Acceptance Rates

                          Overall Acceptance Rate 77 of 238 submissions, 32%

                          Contributors

                          Other Metrics

                          Bibliometrics & Citations

                          Bibliometrics

                          Article Metrics

                          • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
                          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
                          Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

                          Other Metrics

                          Citations

                          Cited By

                          View all
                          • (2020)Extraction Patterns to Derive Social Networks from Linked Open Data Using SPARQLInformation10.3390/info1107036111:7(361)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2020
                          • (2018)Constructing Differentiated Educational Materials Using Semantic Annotation for Sustainable Education in IoT EnvironmentsSustainability10.3390/su1004129610:4(1296)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2018
                          • (2017)Social Semantic SearchInternational Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems10.4018/IJSWIS.201710010813:4(155-180)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
                          • (2015)Semantic social analytics and linked open data cloudProceedings of the 2015 10th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP)10.1109/SMAP.2015.7370091(1-6)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2015
                          • (2014)Aligning web collaboration tools with research data for scholarsProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2567948.2579031(1203-1208)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2014
                          • (2014)Semantifying TwitterProceedings of the 2014 9th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization10.1109/SMAP.2014.23(98-103)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2014
                          • (2014)Construction of Personalized Information Services for ResearchersKnowledge Engineering and the Semantic Web10.1007/978-3-319-11716-4_4(44-56)Online publication date: 2014
                          • (2013)The Influence of Twitter on the Academic EnvironmentSocial Media and the New Academic Environment10.4018/978-1-4666-2851-9.ch015(293-307)Online publication date: 2013

                          View Options

                          Login options

                          View options

                          PDF

                          View or Download as a PDF file.

                          PDF

                          eReader

                          View online with eReader.

                          eReader

                          Figures

                          Tables

                          Media

                          Share

                          Share

                          Share this Publication link

                          Share on social media