skip to main content
10.1145/2024724.2024921acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Universal logic modules based on double-gate carbon nanotube transistors

Published:05 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Double-gate carbon nanotube field-effect transistors (DG-CNT-FETs) can be controlled in the field to be either n-type or p-type through an extra polarity gate. This results in an embedded XOR behavior, which has inspired several novel circuit designs and architectures. This work makes the following contributions. First, we propose an accurate and efficient semi-classical modeling approach to realize the first SPICE-compatible model for circuit design and optimization of DG-CNTFETs. Second, we design and optimize universal logic modules (ULMs) in two circuit styles based on DG-CNTFETs. The proposed ULMs can leverage the full potential of the embedded XOR through the FPGA-centric lookup table optimization flow. Further, we demonstrate that DG-CNTFET ULMs in the double pass-transistor logic style, which inherently produces dual-rail outputs with balanced delay, are faster than DG-CNTFET circuits in the conventional single-rail static logic style that relies on explicit input inversion. On average across 12 benchmarks, the proposed dual-rail ULMs outperform the best DG-CNTFET fabrics based on tiling patterns by 37%, 12%, and 33% in area, delay, and total power, respectively.

References

  1. P. Avouris, Z. Chen, and V. Perebeinos, "Carbon-based electronics," Nature Nan-otechnology, vol. 2, pp. 605--615, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Heinze et al., "Carbon nanotubes as Schottky barrier transistors," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 89, p. 106801, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Javey et al., "Ballistic carbon nanotube field-effect transistors," Nature, vol. 424, pp. 654--657, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Y. Lin et al., "Ambipolar-to-unipolar conversion of carbon nanotube transistors by gate structure engineering," Nano Letters, vol. 4, pp. 947--950, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. I. O'Connor et al., "CNTFET modeling and reconfigurable logic-circuit design," IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems I, vol. 54, pp. 2365--2379, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Liu et al., "Novel CNTFET-based reconfigurable logic gate design," in Proc. Design Automation Conference, pp. 276--277, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. H. B. Jamaa et al., "Programmable logic circuits based on ambipolar CN-FET," in Proc. Design Automation Conference, pp. 339--340, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. H. B. Jamaa et al., "Logic circuits with ambipolar CNTFETs: Novel opportunities for multi-level logic synthesis," in Proc. Design Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 622--627, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Marchi et al., "Regular fabric design with ambipolar CNTFETs for FPGA and structured ASIC applications," in Proc. Intl. Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures, pp. 65--70, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Jabeur et al., "Reducing transistor count in clocked standard cells with am-bipolar double-gate FETs," in Proc. Intl. Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures, pp. 47--52, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Fiori and G. Iannaccone, "NanoTCAD ViDES," 2008. DOI: 10254/nanohubr5116.3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Suzuki et al., "A 1.5ns 32--b CMOS ALU in double pass-transistor logic," Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 28, pp. 1145--1151, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. Guo et al., "A numerical study of scaling issues for Schottky-barrier carbon nanotube transistors," IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, vol. 51, pp. 172--177, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Y.-M. Lin et al., "High-performance carbon nanotube field-effect transistor with tunable polarities," IEEE Trans. Nanotechnology, vol. 4, pp. 481--489, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Deng and H. Wong, "A compact SPICE model for carbon-manotube field-effect transistors including nonidealities and its application --- Part I: Model of the intrinsic channel region," IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, vol. 54, pp. 3186--3194, Dec. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. A. Balijepalli et al., "Compact modeling of carbon nanotube transistor for early stage process-design exploration," in Proc. Intl. Symposium Low Power Electronics and Design, pp. 2--7, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Hazeghi et al., "Schottky-barrier carbon nanotube field-effect transistor modeling," IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 439--445, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. X. Yang and K. Mohanram, "Modeling and performance investigation of the double-gate carbon nanotube transistor," IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 32, pp. 231--233, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Y. Tsividis, Operation and modeling of the MOS transistors. WCB/McGraw-Hill, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. N. Patil et al., "Circuit-level performance benchmarking and scalability analysis of carbon nanotube transistor circuits," IEEE Trans. Nanotechnology, vol. 8, pp. 37--45, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. N. Song and M. A. Perkowski, "Exorcism-mv-2: Minimization of exclusive sum of products expressions for multiple-balued input incompletely specified functions," in Proc. Intl. Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, pp. 132--137, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. J. P. Hansen and M. Sekine, "Synthesis by spectral translation using Boolean decision diagrams," in Proc. Design Automation Conference, pp. 248--253, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Bernasconi et al., "Efficient minimization of fully testable 2-spp networks," in Proc. Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 1--6, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D. C. Forslund, "The universal logic block (ULB) and its application to logic design," Annual Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory, pp. 236--250, 1966. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Yau and C. Tang, "Universal logic modules and their applications," IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. C-19, no. 2, pp. 141--149, 1970. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. C. Edwards, "A special class of Universal logic gate (ULG) and their evaluation under the walsh transform," Computers and Digital Techniques, vol. 44, pp. 49--59, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. X. Chen and X. Wu, "Derivation of universal logic modules, for n≥3, by algebraic means," Computers and Digital Techniques, vol. 128, pp. 205--211, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. M. Hutter, "Designing universal logic modules," in Proc. Intl. Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, pp. 709--712, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. S. Hurst, D. Miller, and J. Muzio, Spectral Techniques in Digital Logic. Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd., 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. A. D. Franklin et al., "Length scaling of carbon nanotube transistors," Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 5, pp. 858--862, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. "ABC Logic synthesis tool." Please visit the URL http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~alanmi/abc/for further details.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Universal logic modules based on double-gate carbon nanotube transistors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DAC '11: Proceedings of the 48th Design Automation Conference
      June 2011
      1055 pages
      ISBN:9781450306362
      DOI:10.1145/2024724

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 June 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      DAC '24
      61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
      June 23 - 27, 2024
      San Francisco , CA , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader