skip to main content
research-article

Adoption versus use diffusion of iDTV in flanders - personalized television content as a tool to cross the chasm?

Published: 14 November 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Digital television was introduced to the Belgian market in 2005, which is fairly late compared to other European countries. By 2010, in Flanders the 50% penetration threshold of digital television households was surpassed. Considering previous research into the adoption of digital television in Belgium, it can be stated that the “majority segments” have embraced iDTV. However, research suggests that this has not necessarily induced a change in their viewing habits and that interactive applications such as video on demand, time-shifted viewing, voting, email, etc., have remained “underused.” Therefore, the user adoption rate of 50% for iDTV does not automatically imply a 50% use diffusion rate of interactive services.
Within the iDTV industry, an important challenge will be to convince the remaining 50% of analog viewers to make the switch to digital television. A review of the literature on the adoption and diffusion processes of technologies shows that these later adopters (laggards and late majority) base their decision on the behavior of peers who have already acquired the technology. As they are the least innovative market segment, they will require some compelling arguments to adopt iDTV. These selling arguments could be related to the added value of interactive services which are currently not being used to their full potential by iDTV subscribers. One of the ideas that is currently explored is personalized television content, recommended to television viewers based on their viewing behavior.
This article discusses three important research questions based on quantitative empirical data. Firstly, what is the current state-of-the-art in Flanders regarding the adoption and use diffusion of digital television in Flanders? Secondly, what is the interest in a personalization and recommendation tool for iDTV in Flanders? Thirdly, how would an introduction of this tool affect the adoption and use diffusion of iDTV in Flanders? Based on the results presented in this article, it seems that the implementation of a personalization and recommendation tool might stimulate the adoption as well as the use diffusion of digital TV in Flanders.

References

[1]
Ansari, A., Essegaier, S., and Kohli, R. 2000, Internet recommendation systems. J. Market. Res. 37, 363--375.
[2]
Ardissono, L., Kobsa, A., and Maybury, M. 2004. Personalised Digital Television. Targeting Programs to Individual Viewers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
[3]
Berte, K. 2009. Challenges for TV advertising in a changing media environment. In Pasadeos, Variety in Mass Communication Research.
[4]
Berte, K. 2010. Reclame in een digitaal medialandschap. Uitdagingen, opportuniteiten en knelpunten voor reclame op interactieve digitale televisie. PHD dissertation, Departement of Communication Sciences, Ghent University.
[5]
Bijker, W. and Law, J. 1992. Shaping Technology, Building Society. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[6]
Boczkowski, P. J. 2004. The mutual shaping of technology and society in videotex newspapers: Beyond the diffusion and social shaping perspectives. The Inf. Soc. 20, 255--267.
[7]
Chorianopoulos, K. 2008. Personalized and mobile digital TV applications. Multimedia Tools Appl. 36, 1--10.
[8]
De Bens, E. 1986. Cable penetration and competition among belgian and foreign stations. Euro. J. Comm. 1, 4, 477--492.
[9]
De Marez, L. and Verleye, G. 2004. ICT-Innovations today: Making traditional diffusion patterns obsolete, and preliminary insight of increased importance. Telematics Informatics. 235--260.
[10]
De Marez, L. 2006. Diffusie van ICT-innovaties: Accurater gebruikersinzicht voor betere introductiestrategieën. Doctoral thesis. Universiteit Gent.
[11]
De Marez, L., Evens, T., Schuurman, D., Berte, K., and De Jonghe, E. 2008 Assessing the added value of alternative distribution methods for digital TV in a cable-dominant region. In A. Urban, B. Sapio, and T. Turck Eds. Digital Television Revisited. Linking Users, Markets and Policies.
[12]
De Ruyter, K. 2009. Voor het mooie beeld. Waarom digitale televisie succesvol is. De Standaard (8/5/09).
[13]
Dosi, A. I. and Prario, B. 2005. “Digital television era: Is content the king?” Trípodos Extra 4, 651--660.
[14]
European Audiovisual Observatory. 2008. Yearbook—Online premium service. http://www.obs.coe.int/yb2008/members/CNumPage.html.
[15]
Fichman, R. G. 1992. Information technology diffusion: A review of empirical research. In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Information Systems.
[16]
Frissen, V. and Van Lieshout, M. 2006. ICT and everyday life: The role of the user. In Technology, Behavior and the Environment, a Multidisciplinary Approach. P. Verbeek and A. Slob. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
[17]
Gal-Or, E., Gal-Or, M., May, J. H., and Spangler, W. E. 2006. Targeted advertising strategies on television. Manag. Sci. 52, 5, 713--725.
[18]
Geroski, P. A. 2000. Models of technology diffusion. Res. Policy 29, 603--625.
[19]
Ha, S. H. 2004. An intelligent system for personalized advertising on the internet. In K. Bauknecht, M. Bichler and B. Pröll Eds., E-Commerce and Web Technologies. Springer, 21--30.
[20]
Haddon, L. 2006. The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Inf. Soc. 22, 4, 195--204.
[21]
Hans-Bredow-Institut. 2009. Internationales Handbuch Medien. Baden Baden: Nomos Verlag.
[22]
Hirst, M. and Harrison, J. 2007. Communication and New Media. From Broadcast to Narrowcast. Oxford University Press, Sidney.
[23]
Ilab, O. 2010. Digimeter, rapport 2. Mediatechnologie en ICT-gebruik in Vlaanderen. Wave 2. IBBT, Ghent.
[24]
Iosifidis, P. 2007. Digital TV, digital switchover and public service broadcasting in Europe. Javnost-the public 14, 5--20.
[25]
Jankowski, N. and Van Selm, M. 2001. ICT en samenleving. Vier terreinen voor empirisch onderzoek. In: Bouwman, H. Ed., Communicatie in de Informatiesamenleving. Lemma, Utrecht, 217--249.
[26]
Kazienko, P. and Adamski, M. 2007. AdROSA—Adaptive personalization of web advertising. Inf. Sci. 177, 2269--2295.
[27]
Lekakos, G. and Giaglis, G. M. 2002. Delivering personalized advertisements in digital television: A methodology and empirical evaluation. AH'2002 Workshop on Personalization in Future TV. http://uitv.info/topics/ah02tv02/
[28]
Lekakos, G., Chorianopoulos, K., and Spinellis, D. 2001. Information design in the living room: A case study of personalized interactive TV design. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems.
[29]
Lim, J., Kim, M., Lee, B., Kim, B., Lee, H., and Lee, H. 2008. A target advertisement system based on TV viewer's profile reasoning. Multimedia Tools Appl. 36, 11--35.
[30]
Livingstone, S. 2004. The challenge of changing audiences. Or, what is the audience researcher to do in the age of the internet? Europ. J. Comm. 19, 1, 75--86.
[31]
Mahajan, V. and Muller, E. 2000. New Product Diffusion Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
[32]
McQuail, D. 1997. Audience Analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[33]
Moore, G. A. 1991. Crossing the Chasm. Marketing and Selling Technology Products to Mainstream Customers. HarperCollins Publisher, New York.
[34]
Pagani, G., Prario, B., Visentin, F., and Zorzi, Y. 2005. The key of succes, the cause of failure: A comparative analysis of two UK digital television companies. In C. Dal Zotto Ed., Growth and Dynamics of Maturing New Media Companies. 115--138.
[35]
Papathanassopoulos, S. 2002. European Television in the Digital Age. Blackwel Publishers Ltd., Cambridge.
[36]
Poiesz, T. B. C. and Van Raaij, W. F. 2002. Synergetische Marketing. Een Visie op Oorzaken en Gevolg van Veranderend Consumentengedrag. Prentice Hall, Amsterdam.
[37]
Pramataris, K., Papkyriakopoloulos, D., Lekakos, G., and Mylonopoulos, N. 2001. Personalisazed interactive TV advertising: The iMEDIA business model. Electron. Market. 11, 1, 1--9.
[38]
Punie, Y. 2000. Domesticatie van ICT. Adoptie, gebruik en betekenis van media in het dagelijkse leven: Continue beperking of discontinue bevrijding? Tech. rep., Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
[39]
Robertson, T. S. 1984. Marketing's potential contribution to consumer behavior research: The case of diffusion theory. Advan. Consum. Res. 11, 484--489.
[40]
Robertson, T. S. and Gatignon, H. 1986. Competitive effects on technology diffusion. The J. Market. 50, 3, 1--12.
[41]
Rogers, E. 1976. New product adoption and diffusion. J. Consum. Res. 2, 290--301.
[42]
Rogers, E. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations 5th Ed. The Free Press, New York.
[43]
Shih, C.-F. and Venkatesh, A. 2004. Beyond adoption: Development and application of a use-diffusion model. The J. Market. 68, 1, 59--72.
[44]
Silverstone, R. and Haddon, L. 1996. Design and domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In Silverstone, R. and Mansell, R. Eds., Communication by Design. The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[45]
Slater, S. F. and Mohr, J. J. 2006. Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation: Insights based on strategy type. J. Product Innov. Manag. 23, 1, 26--33.
[46]
Smith, S. M. and Krugman, D. M. 2009. Viewer as media decision-maker. Digital video recorders and household media consumption. Int. J. Advertis. 28, 2, 231--255.
[47]
Snoeck, D. 2009a. Oorlog om digitale televisiekijker. De Tijd (May 12) 1.
[48]
Snoeck, D. 2009b. Recordgroei voor Belgacom TV. De Tijd (Oktober 31) 4.
[49]
van den Broeck, W., Pierson, J., and Pauwels, C. 2004. Does interactive television imply new uses? A Flemish case study. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Interactive Television Enhancing the experience.
[50]
Verdegem, P., Hauttekeete, L., and De Marez, L. 2009. The analog switch-off in a cable dominated television landscape. Implications for the transition to digital television in Flanders. Comm. 34, 1, 87--101.
[51]
Williams, R. and Edge, D. 1996. The social shaping of technology. Res. Policy 25, 865--899.

Index Terms

  1. Adoption versus use diffusion of iDTV in flanders - personalized television content as a tool to cross the chasm?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Computers in Entertainment
    Computers in Entertainment   Volume 9, Issue 3
    Theoretical and Practical Computer Applications in Entertainment
    November 2011
    196 pages
    EISSN:1544-3574
    DOI:10.1145/2027456
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 November 2011
    Published in CIE Volume 9, Issue 3

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Diffusion of innovations
    2. content recommendation
    3. interactive digital television
    4. personalization
    5. use diffusion

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 583
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media