Tawanna R. Dillahunt
ABSTRACT
Prior research results show that comparison as a feedback technique can encourage additional savings; however, a limited number of home-energy studies explore social communication around feedback devices. We will develop a system that supports comparison and cross-household communication, and provides energy-use information. We will then deploy our system across 50 mixed-income renters. Our expected contributions include an interactive system for supporting comparison and collaboration; a better understanding of the conditions that motivate or discourage energy conservative behaviors for individuals that pay and do not pay for their electricity; and design recommendations for visualizations that allow comparison and collaboration across households.
- Allcott, H. (2010). Social norms and energy conservation. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Working Paper 09--14.Google Scholar
- Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J Env. Psych, 25:273--291.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Crompton, T., Thørgersen, J. (2009). Simple & painless?, World Wildlife Fund Report, February 2009.Google Scholar
- Darby, S.(2006). The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. Environmental Change Institute, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Darby, S. (2000). Making it obvious: designing feedback into energy consumption. In Proc. Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting, 2000.Google Scholar
- Davidoff, S., Dey, A., & Zimmerman, J. (2007). Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. In Proc. of Ubicomp '07, 429--446. Google ScholarDigital Library
- De Young, R.(2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior, Journal of Social Issues. Vol. 56, No. 3, 2000. 509--526.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dillahunt, T., Mankoff, J. & Paulos, E. (2010). Understanding conflict between landlords and tenants: Implications for energy sensing and feedback. In Proc. Ubicomp '10, 149--158. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dillahunt, T., Mankoff, J., Paulos, E. & Fussell, S. (2009). It's not all about green: Energy use in low-income communities. In Proc. Ubicomp '09, 255--264. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G., Jones, R.E. Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP Scale -- Statistical Data Included. Journal of Social Issues. Fall 2000.Google Scholar
- 1Fischer, C. (2008) Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1, 79--104, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Froehlich, J., Findlater, L. & Landay, J. (2010). The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proc. CHI '10, 1999--2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gardner, G. & Stern, P. (2009). The short list: The most effective actions U.S. households can take to curb climate change. Viewed 04/30/2011. http://www.environmentmagazine.org/Archives/BackIssues/September-October202008/gardner-stern-full.html.Google Scholar
- Grønhøj, A. & Thørgersen, J.(2011), Feedback on household electricity consumption; learning and social influence processes. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35:138--145.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Historical Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979--2005, Congressional Budget Office, Kentucky State Data Center, As of 6/15/11: http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=8885. Produced by the Kentucky State Data Center, 2007.Google Scholar
- Martiskainen, M. (2007). Affecting Consumer Behavior on Energy Demand. Final report to EdF Energy. March 2009. Sussex Energy Group. University of Sussex. Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
- Parker, D., Hoak, D., Meier, A., Brown, R. (2006). How much energy are we using? Potential of residential energy demand feedback devices. Proceedings of the 2006 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Asilomar, CA., August 2006.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau Newsroom (2009). Facts for features. Viewed 06/15/2011 http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/.Google Scholar
- Vaughan, T. (1968). The landlord-tenant relation in a low-income area. Social Problems, 16(2):208--218.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Communication around home-energy monitoring devices: connecting stakeholders in low-income communities
Recommendations
Devices to Devices (Ds2Ds) Communication: Towards Energy Efficient IoT
2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)Emerging device centric communication technologies such as device to device (D2D) communication, devices to device (Ds2D) communication and multi- homing (MH) D2D have been considered as essential part of future 5G networks as well as internet of things (...
Networking Low-Power Energy Harvesting Devices: Measurements and Algorithms
Recent advances in energy harvesting materials and ultra-low-power communications will soon enable the realization of networks composed of energy harvesting devices. These devices will operate using very low ambient energy, such as energy harvested from ...
Enabling Green IoT: Energy-Aware Communication Protocols for Battery-less LoRaWAN Devices
MSWiM '21: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile SystemsMany IoT scenarios, such as smart cities, wild life monitoring, or smart agriculture, involve thousands of battery-powered devices. The disposal and replacement of such batteries represent an important economical and environmental cost. To realize Green ...
Comments