skip to main content
10.1145/2037373.2037393acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Forcetap: extending the input vocabulary of mobile touch screens by adding tap gestures

Published:30 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce an interaction technique that increases the touch screen input vocabulary by distinguishing a strong tap from a gentle tap without the use of additional hardware. We have designed and validated an algorithm that detects different types of screen touches by combining data from the built-in accelerometer with position data from the touch screen. The proposed technique allows a touch screen input to contain not only the position of a finger contact, but also its type, i.e., whether the contact is a 'Tap' or a 'ForceTap.' To verify the feasibility of the proposed technique we have implemented our detection algorithm in experiments that test cases of single-handed, two-handed, immersive, and on the move usage. Based on the experimental results, we investigate the advantages of using two types of touch inputs and discuss emerging issues. Finally, we suggest a design guideline for applying the proposed technique to touch screen applications, and present possible application scenarios.

References

  1. Apple GarageBand for iPad. http://www.apple.com/ipad/from-the-app-store/garageband.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarkson, E. C., Patel, S. N., Pierce, J. S., Abowd, G. D. Exploring continuous pressure input for mobile phones. GVU Technical Report, GIT-GVU-06-20, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dabrowski, J. R. and Munson, E. V. Is 100 milliseconds too fast? Ext. Abstracts CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 317--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Davidson, P. L. and Han, J. Y. Extending 2D object arrangement with pressure-sensitive layering cues. In Proc. UIST 2008, ACM Press (2008), 87--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Greatapps. TapForce, 2009, http://greatapps.co.uk/technologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Heo, S. and Lee, G. Force Gestures: augmented touch screen gestures using normal and tangential force. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 1909--1914. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hinckley, K. and Song, H. Sensor synaesthesia: touch in motion, and motion in touch. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 801--810. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hu, C., Tung, K., and Lau, L. Music Wall: a tangible user interface using tapping as an interactive technique. In Proc. APCHI 2008, LNCS vol. 5068. 284--291, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hudson, S. E., Harrison, C., Harrison, B. L., and LaMarca, A. whack gestures: inexact and inattentive interaction with mobile devices. In Proc. TEI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 109--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Iwasaki, K., Miyaki, T., and Rekimoto, J. Expressive typing: a new way to sense typing pressure and its applications. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 4369--4374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Linjama, J., Hakkila, J., and Ronkainen, S. Gesture interfaces for mobile devices - minimalist approach for haptic interaction. In CHI Workshop: Hands on Haptics: Exploring Non-Visual Visualisation Using the Sense of Touch. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Linjama, J. and Kaaresoja, T. Novel, minimalist haptic gesture interaction for mobile devices, In Proc. NordiCHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 457--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Karlson, A. K., Benderson, B. B. and Contreras-Vidal, J. L. Understanding one handed use of mobile devices. In Handbook of Research on User Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology, IGI Global, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, R. B. Response time in man-computer conversational transactions. In AFIPS 1968: Proc. of the Dec. 9--11, 1968, Joint Computer Conference (Fall, part I), ACM Press (1968), 267--277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Miyaki, T. and Rekimoto, J. GraspZoom: zooming and scrolling control model for single-handed mobile interaction. In Proc. MobileHCI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Olwal, A., Feiner, S., and Heyman, S. Rubbing and tapping for precise and rapid selection on touch-screen displays. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ramos, G. A. and Balakrishnan, R. Pressure marks. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 1375--1384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ramos, G. and Balakrishnan, R. Zliding: fluid zooming and sliding for high precision parameter manipulation. In Proc. UIST 2005, ACM Press (2005), 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ramos, G., Boulos, M., and Balakrishnan, R. Pressure widgets. In Proc. CHI 2004. ACM Press (2004), 487--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ronkainen, S., Häkkilä, J., Kaleva, S., Colley, A., and Linjama, J. Tap input as an embedded interaction method for mobile devices. In Proc. TEI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 263--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Roudaut, A., Huot, S., and Lecolinet, E. TapTap and MagStick: improving one-handed target acquisition on small touch-screens. In Proc. AVI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 146--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Roudaut, A., Lecolinet, E., and Guiard, Y. MicroRolls: expanding touch-screen input vocabulary by distinguishing rolls vs. slides of the thumb. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 927--936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Roth, V. and Turner, T. Bezel swipe: conflict-free scrolling and multiple selection on mobile touch screen devices. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 1523--1526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Schmidt, D., Chehimi, F., Rukzio, E. and Gellersen, H. PhoneTouch: a technique for direct phone interaction on surfaces. In Proc. UIST 2010, ACM Press (2010), 13--16 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Stewart, C., Rohs, M., Kratz, S., and Essl, G. Characteristics of pressure-based input for mobile devices. In Proc. CHI 2010. ACM Press (2010), 801--810. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Vogel, D. and Baudisch, P. Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 657--666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Forcetap: extending the input vocabulary of mobile touch screens by adding tap gestures

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MobileHCI '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
        August 2011
        781 pages
        ISBN:9781450305419
        DOI:10.1145/2037373

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 August 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader