skip to main content
10.1145/2037373.2037464acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Release your app on Sunday eve: finding the best time to deploy apps

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile application stores such as Apple's App Store and Google's Android Market enable researchers to use App Stores as a platform for user studies. Because successful studies can require a large number of users researchers might need to attract a large audience. The right timing when releasing or updating apps can considerably increase the number of installations. Using a game that is published in the Android Market we analyze when people install games. Furthermore, we determine when developers deploy games in the Android Market. We combine data from 157,438 installations of the game and the observation of 24,647 published apps. Our results suggest that the best time to deploy a game in the Android Market is on Sunday evening GMT.

References

  1. Girardello, A. and Michahelles, F.. AppAware: Which Mobile Applications Are Hot? Proc. MobileHCI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Henze, N., Pielot, M., Poppinga, B., Schinke, T. and Boll, S. My App is an Experiment: Experience from User Studies in Mobile App Stores. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Henze, N., Poppinga, B., and Boll, S.. Experiments in the Wild: Public Evaluation of Off-Screen Visualizations in the Android Market. Proc. NordiCHI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Henze, N., Rukzio, E. and Boll, S. 100,000,000 Taps: Analysis and Improvement of Touch Performance in the Large, Proc. MobileHCI, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Karlson, A. K., Iqbal, S. T., Meyers, B. Ramos, G. Lee, K. and Tang, J. C. Mobile taskflow in context: a screenshot study of smartphone usage. Proc. CHI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kiukkonen, N., Blom, J. Dousse, O. Gatica-Perez, D., and Laurila, J. Towards rich mobile phone datasets: Lausanne data collection campaign. Proc. ICPS, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Park, Y. S., Han, S. H., Park, J., and Cho, Y. Touch key design for target selection on a mobile phone. Proc. MobileHCI, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Pielot, M., Poppinga, B. and Boll, S. PocketNavigator: Vibro-Tactile Waypoint Navigation for Everyday Mobile Devices. Adjunct Proc. MobileHCI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. McMillan, D., Morrison, A., Brown, O., Hall, M. and Chalmers, M.. Further into the wild: Running worldwide trials of mobile systems. Proc. Pervasive, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Zhai, S., Kristensson, P., Gong, P., Greiner, M. Peng, S., Liu, L. and Dunnigan, A. Shapewriter on the iPhone: from the laboratory to the real world. Proc. CHI, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Release your app on Sunday eve: finding the best time to deploy apps

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MobileHCI '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
        August 2011
        781 pages
        ISBN:9781450305419
        DOI:10.1145/2037373

        Copyright © 2011 Authors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 August 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader