skip to main content
10.1145/2047196.2047232acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Access overlays: improving non-visual access to large touch screens for blind users

Published:16 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many touch screens remain inaccessible to blind users, and those approaches to providing access that do exist offer minimal support for interacting with large touch screens or spatial data. In this paper, we introduce a set of three software-based access overlays intended to improve the accessibility of large touch screen interfaces, specifically interactive tabletops. Our access overlays are called edge projection, neighborhood browsing, and touch-and-speak. In a user study, 14 blind users compared access overlays to an implementation of Apple's VoiceOver screen reader. Our results show that two of our techniques were faster than VoiceOver, that participants correctly answered more questions about the screen's layout using our techniques, and that participants overwhelmingly preferred our techniques. We developed several applications demonstrating the use of access overlays, including an accessible map kiosk and an accessible board game.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

fp198.mp4

mp4

33.1 MB

References

  1. Bau, O., Poupyrev, I., Israr, A., and Harrison, C. TeslaTouch: electrovibration for touch surfaces. UIST '10, 283--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baudisch, P., Zotov, A., Cutrell, E., and Hinckley, K. Starburst: a target expansion algorithm for non-uniform target distributions. AVI '08, 129--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bonner, M., Brudvik, J., Abowd, G., and Edwards, W.K. No-Look Notes: accessible eyes-free multi-touch text entry. Pervasive '10, 409--427. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Buxton, W., Foulds, R., Rosen, M., Scadden, L., and Shein, F. Human interface design and the handicapped user. SIGCHI Bulletin 17, 4 (1986), 291--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buxton, W., Hill, R., and Rowley, P. Issues and techniques in touch-sensitive tablet input. SIGGRAPH '85, 215--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Calder, M., Cohen, R.F., Lanzoni, J., and Xu, Y. PLUMB: an interface for users who are blind to display, create, and modify graphs. ASSETS '06, 263--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Carew, S. Touch-screen gadgets alienate blind. Reuters (2009). http://reut.rs/gHji5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fortune, S. A sweepline algorithm for Voronoi diagrams. Algorithmica 2, 1 (1987), 153--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Grossman, T. and Balakrishnan, R. The bubble cursor: enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor's activation area. CHI '05, 281--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Guerreiro, T., Lagoa, P., Nicolau, H., Gonalves, D., and Jorge, J. From tapping to touching: making touch screens accessible to blind users. IEEE Multimedia 15, 4 (2008), 48--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hancock, M.S., Shen, C., Forlines, C., and Ryall, K. Exploring non-speech auditory feedback at an interactive multi-user tabletop. GI '05, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hart, P.E., Nilsson, N.J., and Raphael, B. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 4, 2 (1968), 100--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Higgins, J.J. and Tashtoush, S. An aligned rank transform test for interaction. Nonlinear World 1, 2 (1994), 201--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Holm, S. A simple sequentially rejective Bonferroni test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, (1979), 65--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jagdish, D., Sawhney, R., Gupta, M., and Nangia, S. Sonic Grid: an auditory interface for the visually impaired to navigate GUI-based environments. IUI '08, 337--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kane, S.K., Bigham, J.P., and Wobbrock, J.O. Slide Rule: making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques. ASSETS '08, 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kane, S.K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J.O., and Ladner, R.E. Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. ASSETS '09, 115--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kane, S.K., Wobbrock, J.O., and Ladner, R.E. Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance. CHI '11, 413--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Landau, S. and Wells, L. Merging tactile sensory input and audio data by means of the Talking Tactile Tablet. Eurohaptics '03, 414--418.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Loomis, J.M., Golledge, R.G., and Klatzky, R.L. Navigation system for the blind: auditory display modes and guidance. Presence 7, 2 (1998), 193--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Morris, M.R., Morris, D., and Winograd, T. Individual audio channels with single display groupware: effects on communication and task strategy. CSCW '04, 242--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Plimmer, B., Crossan, A., Brewster, S.A., and Blagojevic, R. Multimodal collaborative handwriting training for visually-impaired people. CHI '08, 393--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Reisinger, D. Universities reject Kindle over inaccessibility for the blind. CNET (2009). http://cnet.co/gSjyv.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Salter, K.C. and Fawcett, R.F. The ART test of interaction: a robust and powerful rank test of interaction in factorial models. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 22, 1 (1993), 137--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Su, J., Rosenzweig, A., Goel, A., de Lara, E., and Truong, K.N. Timbremap: enabling the visually-impaired to use maps on touch-enabled devices. MobileHCI '10, 17--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Talbot, M. and Cowan, W. On the audio representation of distance for blind users. CHI '09, 1839--1848. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tse, E., Hancock, M., and Greenberg, S. Speech-filtered bubble ray: improving target acquisition on display walls. ICMI '07, 307--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing. EyeNote. (2011). http://moneyfactory.gov/images.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. EyeNote_Press_Release_4_4--19_2_4.pd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Vanderheiden, G.C. Use of audio-haptic interface techniques to allow nonvisual access to touchscreen appliances. HFES 40, (1996), 1266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wall, S. and Brewster, S. Feeling what you hear: tactile feedback for navigation of audio graphs. CHI '06, 1123--1132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Weiss, M., Wagner, J., Jansen, Y., Jennings, R., Khoshabeh, R., Hollan, J.D., and Borchers, J. SLAP widgets: bridging the gap between virtual and physical controls on tabletops. CHI '09, 481--490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Wigdor, D., Williams, S., Cronin, M., Levy, R., White, K., Mazeev, M., and Benko, H. Ripples: utilizing per-contact visualizations to improve user interaction with touch displays. UIST '09, 3--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Wobbrock, J.O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., and Higgins, J.J. The Aligned Rank Transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. CHI '11, 143--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Wobbrock, J.O., Morris, M.R., and Wilson, A.D. User-defined gestures for surface computing. CHI '09, 1083--1092. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Worden, A., Walker, N., Bharat, K., and Hudson, S. Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons. CHI '97, 266--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yfantidis, G. and Evreinov, G. Adaptive blind interaction technique for touchscreens. Universal Access in the Information Society 4, 4 (2006), 328--337.. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Access overlays: improving non-visual access to large touch screens for blind users

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UIST '11: Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
          October 2011
          654 pages
          ISBN:9781450307161
          DOI:10.1145/2047196

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 October 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          UIST '11 Paper Acceptance Rate67of262submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

          Upcoming Conference

          UIST '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader