skip to main content
10.1145/2063576.2063837acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning to target: what works for behavioral targeting

Published:24 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Understanding what interests and delights users is critical to effective behavioral targeting, especially in information-poor contexts. As users interact with content and advertising, their passive behavior can reveal their interests towards advertising. Two issues are critical for building effective targeting methods: what metric to optimize for and how to optimize. More specifically, we first attempt to understand what the learning objective should be for behavioral targeting so as to maximize advertiser's performance. While most popular advertising methods optimize for user clicks, as we will show, maximizing clicks does not necessarily imply maximizing purchase activities or transactions, called conversions, which directly translate to advertiser's revenue. In this work we focus on conversions which makes a more relevant metric but also the more challenging one. Second is the issue of how to represent and combine the plethora of user activities such as search queries, page views, ad clicks to perform the targeting. We investigate several sources of user activities as well as methods for inferring conversion likelihood given the activities. We also explore the role played by the temporal aspect of user activities for targeting, e.g., how recent activities compare to the old ones. Based on a rigorous offline empirical evaluation over 200 individual advertising campaigns, we arrive at what we believe are best practices for behavioral targeting. We deploy our approach over live user traffic to demonstrate its superiority over existing state-of-the-art targeting methods.

References

  1. N. Archak, V. S. Mirrokni, and S. Muthukrishnan. Mining advertiser-specific user behavior using adfactors. In Proceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web Conference, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Bagherjeiran, A. O. Hatch, and A. Ratnaparkhi. Ranking for the conversion funnel. In Proceeding of the 33rd SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Bagherjeiran, A. O. Hatch, A. Ratnaparkhi, and R. Parekh. Large-scale customized models for advertisers. In ICDM Workshops, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Chen, D. Pavlov, and J. Canny. Large-scale behavioral targeting. In Proceedings of the 15th SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. I. Click Forensics. Click fraud index. http://www.clickforensics.com/resources/click-fraud-index.html, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Google, Inc. Google analytics. http://www.google.com/analytics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Hatch, A. Bagherjeiran, and A. Ratnaparkhi. Clickable terms for contextual advertising. In ADKDD, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. I. Nielsen Company. Nielsen Claritas PRIZM. http://en-us.nielsen.com/tab/product_families/nielsen_claritas/prizm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Y. Peng, L. Zhang, M. Chang, and Y. Guan. An effective method for combating malicious scripts clickbots. In Proceedings of the 14th European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. J. Pine. Mass customizing products and services. Strategy & Leadership, 21(4):6 -- 55, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. F. Provost, B. Dalessandro, R. Hook, X. Zhang, and A. Murray. Audience selection for on-line brand advertising: privacy-friendly social network targeting. In Proceedings of the 15th SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. Rey and A. Kannan. Conversion rate based bid adjustment for sponsored search auctions. In Proceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web Conference, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X.-R. Wang, K.-W. Chang, C.-J. Hsieh, R.-E. Fan, G.-X. Yuan, H.-F. Yu, F.-L. Huang, and C.-J. Lin. Liblinear -- a library for large linear classification. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/liblinear/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Yan, N. Liu, G. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. Jiang, and Z. Chen. How much can behavioral targeting help online advertising? In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. L. Zhang and Y. Guan. Detecting click fraud in pay-per-click streams of online advertising networks. In Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Learning to target: what works for behavioral targeting

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '11: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
      October 2011
      2712 pages
      ISBN:9781450307178
      DOI:10.1145/2063576

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 October 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader