skip to main content
10.1145/2064058.2064064acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

New trends for reading scientific documents

Published:24 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

When scientists or engineers are looking for information in document collections, or on the web, they generally have a precise objective in mind. Instead of looking for documents "about a topic T", they rather try to answer specific needs such as finding the definition of a concept, finding results for a particular problem, checking whether an idea has already been tested, or comparing the scientific conclusions of two articles. This paper presents an indexing model which includes the decomposition of documents into fragments that will correspond to discourse elements (definition, hypothesis, method, result, etc.). The division of documents into fragments should allow scientists to retrieve more relevant information and to make queries more precise. Each type of discourse element will be modeled by defining specific characteristics. The representation model will allow operations that merge or combine retrieved documents or fragments. We will propose an interface that allows strategic reading such as parallel reading of fragments.

References

  1. Tenopir, C., King, D., and Edwards, S. Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib proceedings (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Hannay, T. What can the web do for science? Computer (Jan 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Shotton, D., Portwin, K., Klyne, G., and Miles, A. Adventures in semantic publishing: exemplar semantic enhancements of a research article. PLoS Comput Biol 5, 4 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Palmer, C., Cragin, M., and Hogan, T. Weak information work in scientific discovery. Information Processing & Management 43, 3 (2007), 808--820. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H., and Dobrowolski, T. Characterising and evaluating information seeking behaviour in a digital environment: Spotlight on the 'bouncer'. Information Processing & Management 43, 4 (2007), 1085--1102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kazai, G. Search and navigation in structured document retrieval: comparison of user behaviour in search on document passages and XML elements, in Proceedings of The Twelfth Australasian Document Computing Symposium (ADCS'07), December 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Groza, T., Muller, K., Handschuh, S., Trif, D. and Decker, S. SALT: Weaving the claim web. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference and 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ISWC/ASWC2007), Busan, South Korea (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007). Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Muller, H.-M., Kenny, E. E., and Sternberg, P. W. Textpresso: An ontology-based information retrieval and extraction system for biological literature. PLoS Biol 2, e309, (2004).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Teufel, S., and Moens, M. Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational linguistics 28, 4 (2002), 409--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., and Tidhar, D. An annotation scheme for citation function. In Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, SigDIAL06, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2006), pp. 80--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. de Waard, A., Shum, B., Carusi, A., Park, J., Samwald, M., and Sandor, A. Hypotheses, evidence and relationships: The hyper approach for representing scientic knowledge claims (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shum, S. B., Clark, T., de Waard, A., Groza, T., Handschuh, S., and Sandor, A. Scientific discourse on the semantic web: A survey of models and enabling technologies. Semantic Web Journal: Interoperability, Usability, Applicability (Nov 2010), 1--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Djioua, B., and Descles, J. Indexing documents by discourse and semantic contents from automatic annotations of texts. FLAIRS (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hernandez, N., Mothe J., Ontologies pour l'aide a l'exploration d'une collection de documents. Veille stratégique, scientifique et technologique, Toulouse, (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ivanov, R., and Raae, L. Inspire: a new scientific information system for hep. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 219 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghoula, N., de Ribaupierre, H., Tardy, C., Falquet, G. Opérations sur des ressources hétérogènes dans un entrepôt de données à base d'ontologie, Journées Francophones sur les Ontologies, Montréal, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Harmsze, F. A modular structure for scientific articles in an electronic environment. PhD thesis, Jan 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Falquet, G., Nerima, L., Ziswiler, J.-C. Hyperbooks (book chapter). In Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Bill McDaniel (Eds.) Semantic Digital Libraries. Bringing Digital Libraries to the Next Generation of Internet. Springer, Berlin, Germany, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ranwez, S., and Crampes, M. Conceptual documents and hypertext documents are two different forms of virtual document. In Proc. Virtual Documents Hypertext Functionality and the Web workshop of the 8th Intl. World Wide Web Conference (Toronto, Canada, 1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Iksal, S., and Garlatti, S. Spécification declarative pour les documents virtuels personalisables. In Actes du congrès Documents virtuels personalisables (DVP2002), S. Garlatti and M. Crampes, Eds, (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. New trends for reading scientific documents

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            BooksOnline '11: Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Online books, complementary social media and crowdsourcing
            October 2011
            72 pages
            ISBN:9781450309615
            DOI:10.1145/2064058

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 24 October 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Upcoming Conference

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader