skip to main content
10.1145/2064713.2064724acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Does word sense disambiguation improve information retrieval?

Published:28 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

A basic form of semantic annotation is to label a word in a document with its correct sense based on the context in which the word occurs, thus providing the disambiguated sense of the word. Performing this task automatically is known as word sense disambiguation, which has been extensively studied in the natural language processing literature. Will semantic annotation of word senses improve information retrieval? This paper provides some thoughts on this question, which lies at the intersection of natural language processing and information retrieval.

References

  1. Y. S. Chan, H. T. Ng, and Z. Zhong. NUS-PT: Exploiting parallel texts for word sense disambiguation in the English all-words tasks. In Proceedings of the SemEval Workshop, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Gonzalo, F. Verdejo, I. Chugur, and J. Cigarrán. Indexing with WordNet synsets can improve text retrieval. In Proceedings of the COLING-ACL Workshop on Usage of WordNet in Natural Language Processing Systems, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Hovy, M. Marcus, M. Palmer, L. Ramshaw, and R. Weischedel. OntoNotes: The 90% solution. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL Short Papers, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S.-B. Kim, H.-C. Seo, and H.-C. Rim. Information retrieval using word senses: Root sense tagging approach. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Krovetz and W. B. Croft. Lexical ambiguity and information retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10(2), 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Y. K. Lee and H. T. Ng. An empirical evaluation of knowledge sources and learning algorithms for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. X. Liu and W. B. Croft. Cluster-based retrieval using language models. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Mihalcea and D. Moldovan. Semantic indexing using WordNet senses. In Proceedings of the ACL 2000 Workshop on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. A. Miller, R. Beckwith, C. Fellbaum, D. Gross, and K. J. Miller. Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4), 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S.-H. Na and H. T. Ng. Enriching document representation via translation for improved monolingual information retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Navigli. Word sense disambiguation: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(2), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. H. T. Ng and H. B. Lee. Integrating multiple knowledge sources to disambiguate word sense: An exemplar-based approach. In Proceedings of ACL, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Sanderson. Word sense disambiguation and information retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Sanderson and C. J. van Rijsbergen. The impact on retrieval effectiveness of skewed frequency distributions. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 17(4), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Schütze and J. O. Pedersen. Information retrieval based on word senses. In Proceedings of SDAIR, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. C. Stokoe, M. P. Oakes, and J. Tait. Word sense disambiguation in information retrieval revisited. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. T. Tao and C. Zhai. An exploration of proximity measures in information retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. E. M. Voorhees. Using WordNet to disambiguate word senses for text retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Zhao and Y. Yun. A proximity language model for information retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Z. Zhong and H. T. Ng. It Makes Sense: A wide-coverage word sense disambiguation system for free text. In Proceedings of ACL 2010 System Demonstrations, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Does word sense disambiguation improve information retrieval?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader