skip to main content
10.1145/2068816.2068819acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pingin' in the rain

Published: 02 November 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Residential Internet connections are susceptible to weather-caused outages: Lightning and wind cause local power failures, direct lightning strikes destroy equipment, and water in the atmosphere degrades satellite links. Outages caused by severe events such as fires and undersea cable cuts are often reported upon by operators and studied by researchers. In contrast, outages cause by ordinary weather are typically limited in scope, and because of their small scale, there has not been comparable effort to understand how weather affects everyday last-mile Internet connectivity. We design and deploy a measurement tool called ThunderPing that measures the connectivity of residential Inter- net hosts before, during, and after forecast periods of severe weather. ThunderPing uses weather alerts from the US National Weather Service to choose a set of residential host addresses to ping from several vantage points on the Internet. We then process this ping data to determine when hosts lose connectivity, completely or partially, and categorize whether these failures occur during periods of severe weather or when the skies are clear. In our preliminary results, we find that compared to clear weather, failures are four times as likely during thunderstorms and two times as likely during rain. We also find that the duration of weather induced outages is relatively small for a satellite provider we focused on.

References

[1]
E. W. W. Chan, X. Luo, W. W. T. Fok, W. Li, and R. K. C. Chang. Non-cooperative diagnosis of submarine cable faults. In Passive and Active Measurement Conference (PAM), 2011.
[2]
Committee on the Internet Under Crisis Conditions: Learning from the Impact of September 11. The Internet Under Crisis Conditions Learning from September 11. National Academies Press, 2003.
[3]
M. Dischinger, A. Haeberlen, K. P. Gummadi, and S. Saroiu. Characterizing residential broadband networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), 2007.
[4]
J. Heidemann, Y. Pradkin, R. Govindan, C. Papadopoulos, G. Bartlett, and J. Bannister. Census and survey of the visible Internet. In Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), 2008.
[5]
MaxMind, Inc. GeoIP city database. http://www.maxmind.com/app/city, Jan. 2011.
[6]
I. Minei and R. Cohen. High-speed internet access through unidirectional geostationary satellite channels. In IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 1999.
[7]
National Weather Service. NWS public alerts in XML/CAP v1.1 and ATOM formats. http://alerts.weather.gov/.
[8]
D. C. Plummer. RFC 826: Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol: Or converting network protocol addresses to 48.bit Ethernet address for transmission on Ethernet hardware, Nov. 1982.
[9]
I. Poese, S. Uhlig, M. A. Kaafa, B. Donnet, and B. Gueye. IP geolocation databases: Unreliable? In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (CCR), 2011.
[10]
Y. Wang, D. Burgener, M. Flores, A. Kuzmanovic, and C. Huang. Towards street-level client-independent IP geolocation. In USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 2011.
[11]
Weather Underground. Weather history and data archive. http://www.wunderground.com/history/.
[12]
B. Wong, I. Stoyanov, and E. G. Sirer. Octant: A comprehensive framework for the geolocalization of Internet hosts. In USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 2007.
[13]
Y. Xie, F. Yu, K. Achan, E. Gillum, M. Goldszmidt, and T. Wobber. How dynamic are IP addresses? In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Towards Improving Outage Detection with Multiple Probing ProtocolsPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-031-56249-5_8(189-205)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
  • (2023)On Large-Scale IP Service Disruptions Dependencies2023 19th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM)10.23919/CNSM59352.2023.10327794(1-5)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Reading Twitter in the Newsroom: Web 2.0 and Traditional-Media Reporting of ConflictsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.3845739Online publication date: 2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IMC '11: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference
November 2011
612 pages
ISBN:9781450310130
DOI:10.1145/2068816
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • USENIX Assoc: USENIX Assoc

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 November 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ThunderPing
  2. outage
  3. ping
  4. weather

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

IMC '11
IMC '11: Internet Measurement Conference
November 2 - 4, 2011
Berlin, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 277 of 1,083 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)134
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Towards Improving Outage Detection with Multiple Probing ProtocolsPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-031-56249-5_8(189-205)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
  • (2023)On Large-Scale IP Service Disruptions Dependencies2023 19th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM)10.23919/CNSM59352.2023.10327794(1-5)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Reading Twitter in the Newsroom: Web 2.0 and Traditional-Media Reporting of ConflictsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.3845739Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Using Gaming Footage as a Source of Internet Latency InformationProceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3618257.3624816(606-626)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Inferring Changes in Daily Human Activity from Internet ResponseProceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3618257.3624796(627-644)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
  • (2023)IPv6 Hitlists at Scale: Be Careful What You Wish ForProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2023 Conference10.1145/3603269.3604829(904-916)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Regenerating Networked Systems’ Monitoring Traces Using Neural NetworksJournal of Network and Systems Management10.1007/s10922-023-09790-932:1Online publication date: 21-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Measuring the Impacts of Power Outages on Internet Hosts in the United StatesCritical Infrastructure Protection XVII10.1007/978-3-031-49585-4_4(62-90)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2023
  • (2022)KL-DectionWireless Communications & Mobile Computing10.1155/2022/50995082022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)"Is my internet down?"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3517745.3561428(290-297)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media