skip to main content
10.1145/2069063.2069083acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Repairing sensors strategies in fault-tolerant wireless sensor networks

Published:03 November 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Fault-tolerance is one of the main issues in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) where applications require a continuous service. In this paper, we show how to use a small number of mobile robots to handle failures that may occur in the WSN. We study two strategies: Centralized Manager Strategy (CMS) and CMS with anticipation noted by CMS* to detect, report sensor failures and coordinate the movement of robots. The goal is to minimize the dysfunction time and avoid the coverage and connectivity degradation of the network upon a failure. The CMS is based on the Centralized Manager Algorithm [1] that we improve to ensure that the central manager robot receives a report upon an occurred failure. This manager robot selects a maintainer robot to replace the failed sensor. However, in the CMS* we propose, the manager robot anticipates the sensor failure and reacts before it happens using an energy state model representing the behavior of a sensor based on a discrete time Markov chain.

References

  1. Y. Mei, C. Xian, Y. Charlie, Repairing Sensor Network Using Mobile Robots, WWASN, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Y. Gao, K.Wu, and F. Li, Analysis on the redundancy of wireless sensor networks, WSNA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Tang, An analytical traffic flow model for cluster-based wireless sensor networks, Pervasive, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Khan, Z.A. Belleudy and C. Auguin, Analytical Model for Energy Consumption Analysis in Grid Based Wireless Sensor Networks, New Technologies, Mobility and Security, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Deokwoo Jung; Savvides, An Energy Efficiency Evaluation for Sensor Nodes with Multiple Processors, Radios and Sensors,INFOCOM 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Mahfoudh, Energy effciency in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks: routing, node activity scheduling and cross-layering,thesis INRIA, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Nemra and N. Aouf, Robust INS/GPS Sensor Fusion for UAV Localization Using SDRE Nonlinear Filtering, Sensors Journal, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. The Network Simulator ns-2,http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer and S. Das, Ad hoc On demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, IETF RFC 3561, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Mei, Y.-H. Lu, Y. C. Hu, and C. G. Lee, A Case Study of Mobile Robot's Energy Consumption and Conservation Techniques, ICAR, 2005..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Repairing sensors strategies in fault-tolerant wireless sensor networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        PE-WASUN '11: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Symposium on Performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc, sensor, and ubiquitous networks
        November 2011
        140 pages
        ISBN:9781450309004
        DOI:10.1145/2069063

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate70of240submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader