skip to main content
research-article

Attentive documents: Eye tracking as implicit feedback for information retrieval and beyond

Published: 13 January 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Reading is one of the most frequent activities of knowledge workers. Eye tracking can provide information on what document parts users read, and how they were read. This article aims at generating implicit relevance feedback from eye movements that can be used for information retrieval personalization and further applications.
We report the findings from two studies which examine the relation between several eye movement measures and user-perceived relevance of read text passages. The results show that the measures are generally noisy, but after personalizing them we find clear relations between the measures and relevance. In addition, the second study demonstrates the effect of using reading behavior as implicit relevance feedback for personalizing search. The results indicate that gaze-based feedback is very useful and can greatly improve the quality of Web search. The article concludes with an outlook introducing attentive documents keeping track of how users consume them. Based on eye movement feedback, we describe a number of possible applications to make working with documents more effective.

References

[1]
Agichtein, E., Brill, E., and Dumais, S. 2006. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'06). ACM, New York, NY, 19--26.
[2]
Ahn, J. W., Brusilovsky, P., He, D., Grady, J., and Li, Q. 2008. Personalized web exploration with task models. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'08). ACM, New York, NY, 1--10.
[3]
Ajanki, A., Hardoon, D., Kaski, S., Puolamäki, K., and Shawe-Taylor, J. 2009. Can eyes reveal interest? Implicit queries from gaze patterns. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 19, 307--339.
[4]
Balatsoukas, P. and Ruthven, I. 2010. The use of relevance criteria during predictive judgment: An eye tracking approach. Proc. Amer. Soc. Info. Sci. Techn. 47, 1, 1--10.
[5]
Biedert, R., Buscher, G., and Dengel, A. 2010a. The eyebook -- using eye tracking to enhance the reading experience. Informatik-Spektrum 33, 3, 272--281.
[6]
Biedert, R., Buscher, G., Schwarz, S., Hees, J., and Dengel, A. 2010b. Text 2.0. In CHI'10: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, NY, 4003--4008.
[7]
Brooks, P., Phang, K. Y., Bradley, R., Oard, D., White, R., and Guimbretiere, F. 2006. Measuring the utility of gaze detection for task modeling: A preliminary study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'06). (Workshop on Intelligent User Interfaces for Intelligence Analysis).
[8]
Buscher, G., Cutrell, E., and Morris, M. R. 2009a. What do you see when you're surfing?: using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09). ACM, New York, NY, 21--30.
[9]
Buscher, G., Dengel, A., and van Elst, L. 2008a. Eye movements as implicit relevance feedback. In CHI'08: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 2991--2996.
[10]
Buscher, G., Dengel, A., and van Elst, L. 2008b. Query expansion using gaze-based feedback on the subdocument level. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'08). ACM, New York, NY, 387--394.
[11]
Buscher, G., van Elst, L., and Dengel, A. 2009b. Segment-level display time as implicit feedback: a comparison to eye tracking. In Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'09). ACM, New York, NY, 67--74.
[12]
Chen, Z. and Xu, Y. 2005. User-oriented relevance judgment: A conceptual model. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'05). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 101.2.
[13]
Claypool, M., Le, P., Wased, M., and Brown, D. 2001. Implicit interest indicators. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'01). ACM Press, New York, NY, 33--40.
[14]
Cole, M. J., Gwizdka, J., Bierig, R., Belkin, N. J., Liu, J., Liu, C., and Zhang, X. 2010. Linking search tasks with low-level eye movement patterns. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE'10). ACM, New York, NY, 109--116.
[15]
Cutrell, E. and Guan, Z. 2007. What are you looking for?: an eye-tracking study of information usage in web search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07). ACM Press, New York, NY, 407--416.
[16]
Davenport, T. H. and Beck, J. C. 2001. The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business. Harvard Business School Press.
[17]
van Elst, L., Kiesel, M., Schwarz, S., Buscher, G., and Lauer, A. 2008. Contextualized Knowledge Acquisition in a Personal Semantic Wiki. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW'08). Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5268, 172--187.
[18]
Fox, S., Karnawat, K., Mydland, M., Dumais, S., and White, T. 2005. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 23, 2, 147--168.
[19]
Golovchinsky, G., Price, M. N., and Schilit, B. N. 1999. From reading to retrieval: freeform ink annotations as queries. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'99). ACM Press, New York, NY, 19--25.
[20]
Gyllstrom, K. 2009. Passages through time: chronicling users' information interaction history by recording when and what they read. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'09). ACM, New York, NY, 147--156.
[21]
Hill, W. C., Hollan, J. D., Wroblewski, D., and McCandless, T. 1992. Edit wear and read wear. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'92). ACM Press, New York, NY, 3--9.
[22]
Hyrskykari, A., Majaranta, P., and Räihä, K.-J. 2003. Proactive response to eye movements. In Proceedings of the International Conferece on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT'03). 129--136.
[23]
Järvelin, K. and Kekäläinen, J. 2000. Ir evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'00). ACM, New York, NY, 41--48.
[24]
Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Radlinski, F., and Gay, G. 2007. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 25, 2.
[25]
Kelly, D. and Belkin, N. J. 2001. Reading time, scrolling and interaction: exploring implicit sources of user preferences for relevance feedback. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'01). ACM, New York, NY, 408--409.
[26]
Kelly, D. and Belkin, N. J. 2004. Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'04). ACM Press, New York, NY, 377--384.
[27]
Kelly, D. and Teevan, J. 2003. Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography. SIGIR Forum 37, 2, 18--28.
[28]
Kiesel, M., Schwarz, S., van Elst, L., and Buscher, G. 2008. Using attention and context information for annotations in a semantic wiki. In Proceedings of the 3rd Semantic Wiki Workshop (SemWiki'08).
[29]
Liversedge, S. P. and Findlay, J. M. 2000. Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 1, 6--14.
[30]
Loboda, T. D., Brusilovsky, P., and Brunstein, J. 2011. Inferring word relevance from eye-movements of readers. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'11). ACM, New York, NY, 175--184.
[31]
Majaranta, P. and Räihä, K.-J. 2002. Twenty years of eye typing: systems and design issues. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA'02). ACM, New York, NY, 15--22.
[32]
Melucci, M. and White, R. W. 2007. Discovering hidden contextual factors for implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the CIR'07 Workshop on Context-Based Information Retrieval (in conjunction with CONTEXT'07).
[33]
Moe, K. K., Jensen, J. M., and Larsen, B. 2007. A qualitative look at eye-tracking for implicit relevance feedback. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Context-Based Information Retrieval. B.-L. Doan, J. Jose, and M. Melucci, Eds., 36--47.
[34]
Morita, M. and Shinoda, Y. 1994. Information filtering based on user behavior analysis and best match text retrieval. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'94). Springer, 272--281.
[35]
Ohno, T. 2004. Eyeprint: support of document browsing with eye gaze trace. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI'04). ACM, New York, NY, 16--23.
[36]
Puolamäki, K., Salojärvi, J., Savia, E., Simola, J., and Kaski, S. 2005. Combining eye movements and collaborative filtering for proactive information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'05). ACM Press, New York, NY, 146--153.
[37]
Rayner, K. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psych. Bull. 124, 3, 372--422.
[38]
Rocchio, J. 1971. The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. Prentice Hall, 313--323.
[39]
Salton, G. and Buckley, C. 1990. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. 41, 4, 288--297.
[40]
Simon, H. A. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press.
[41]
Simon, H. A. 1971. Designing organizations for an information rich world. In Computers, Communications and the Public Interest. Johns Hopkins Press, 38--51.
[42]
White, R. W. and Kelly, D. 2006. A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM'06). ACM, New York, NY, 297--306.
[43]
Wilcox, R. 2005. Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing, 2nd Ed. Elsevier Academic Press.
[44]
Xu, S., Jiang, H., and Lau, F. C. 2009. User-oriented document summarization through vision-based eye-tracking. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'09). ACM, New York, NY, 7--16.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modeling Attentive Interaction Behavior for Web Content Identification in Exploratory Information SeekingProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36997508:4(1-28)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
  • (2024)EyeLiveMetrics: Real-time Analysis of Online Reading with Eye TrackingProceedings of the 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications10.1145/3649902.3656495(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Towards Detecting and Mitigating Cognitive Bias in Spoken Conversational SearchAdjunct Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3640471.3680245(1-10)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems  Volume 1, Issue 2
January 2012
157 pages
ISSN:2160-6455
EISSN:2160-6463
DOI:10.1145/2070719
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 January 2012
Accepted: 01 August 2011
Revised: 01 June 2011
Received: 01 December 2010
Published in TIIS Volume 1, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Relevance feedback
  2. attentive documents
  3. eye movement measures
  4. personalization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)76
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modeling Attentive Interaction Behavior for Web Content Identification in Exploratory Information SeekingProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36997508:4(1-28)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
  • (2024)EyeLiveMetrics: Real-time Analysis of Online Reading with Eye TrackingProceedings of the 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications10.1145/3649902.3656495(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Towards Detecting and Mitigating Cognitive Bias in Spoken Conversational SearchAdjunct Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3640471.3680245(1-10)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating Generative Ad Hoc Information RetrievalProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657849(1916-1929)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Gluten-free products: Consumer perception of the functional properties and peculiarities of labellingUpravlenets10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-4-614:4(87-99)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Subjective Difficulty Estimation of Educational Comics Using Gaze FeaturesIEICE Transactions on Information and Systems10.1587/transinf.2022EDP7100E106.D:5(1038-1048)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • (2023)Examining the Impact of Uncontrolled Variables on Physiological Signals in User Studies for Information Processing ActivitiesProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3539618.3591981(1971-1975)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Contradicted by the Brain: Predicting Individual and Group Preferences via Brain-Computer InterfacingIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing10.1109/TAFFC.2022.322588514:4(3094-3105)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Evaluating the Feasibility of Predicting Information Relevance During Sensemaking with Eye Gaze Data2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00086(713-722)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Mining Eye-Tracking Data for Text SummarizationInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.222782740:17(4887-4905)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media