ABSTRACT
The purpose of this paper is to understand the significance of form elements through the interpretations of design sketches. These interpretations are provided by designers themselves interpreting expressive characteristics of car images, and by students interpreting the sketches of designers' morphing sequences. In the experimental investigation of the sketching process through morphing sequence exercises, designers used individually driven styles and approaches when creating product form. These approaches produce characteristically different form ideas, which differ (but also show consistency) with respect to type of car category, expression, identity, recognition, format, composition, complexity, etc. Typically, assessment of generated sketch work and ideas is done using relative heuristic evaluation in a comparative design review. Given a large set of automotive sketches, general patterns of styling emphasis can be identified. The paper concludes that perceptions of designers are varied due to the representation format of the ideas as visual hand sketches. The visual hand sketches point out certain meaning and can be categorized with respect to perceptual characteristics according to the PPE framework and suggest that a tool to support evaluation and generation of early design concepts can be developed, and to support the generation of form ideas with desired characteristics for a brand, product category and market.
- Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., and Clarkson, P. J. 2004. Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, Vol. 25, No. 6, November, pp. 547--577.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cova, B. and Svanfeldt, C. 1993. Societal Innovations and the Postmodern Aestheticization of Everyday Life. International Journal of Research in Marketing 10(3): 297--310.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chayutsahakij, P. and Poggenpohl, S. 2002. User-Centered Innovation: The Interplay between User-Research and Design Innovation. Proceedings of the European Academy of Management 2nd Annual Conference on Innovative Research in Management (EURAM), Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Vredenburg, K., Isensee, S., and Righi, C. 2002. User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Veryzer, R. W. and Borja de Mozota, B. 2005. The Impact of User-Oriented Design on New Product Development: An Examination of Fundamental Relationships. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22: 128--143.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hekkert, P. and Van Dijk, M. 2003. Designing from Context: Foundations and Applications of the ViP Approach. In: P. Lloyd and H. Christiaans (Eds.) Designing in Context: Proceedings of Design Thinking Research Symposium 5 Delft: DUP Science.Google Scholar
- Verganti, R. 2008. Design Driven Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K. M. 1995. Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review 20 (2): 343--378.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shane, S. A. and Ulrich, K. T. 2004. Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science. Management Science 50 (2): 133--144. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, W. C. and Mauborgne, R. 2005. Blue Ocean Strategy: From Theory to Practice. California Management Review 47 (3): 105--121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, V. 2000. Co-opting Customer Competence. Harvard Business Review. January--February, 79--87.Google Scholar
- Cagan, J., and Vogel, C. M. 2002. Creating breakthrough products: Innovation from product planning to program approval. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boztepe, S. 2007. User Value: Competing Theories and Models. International Journal of Design Vol 1, No 2 online.Google Scholar
- Sanders, L. and Simons, G. 2009. A Social Vision for Value Co-creation in Design. Open Source Business Resource, December. Available at http://www.osbr.ca/ojs/index.php/osbr/article/view/1012/973Google Scholar
- Dodds, W. B. and Monroe, K. B. 1985. The Effect of Brand and Price Information on Subjective Product Evaluations, in Advances in Consumer Research Volume 12, eds. Elizabeth C. Hirschman and Moris B. Holbrook, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 85--90.Google Scholar
- Tovey, M., Porter, S., and Newman, R. 2003. Sketching, concept development and automotive design. Design Studies, 24(2), 135--153.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Catalano, C. E. 2004. Feature-based methods for free-form surface manipulation in aesthetic engineering. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Genoa, Italy.Google Scholar
- Cheutet, V., Catalano, C. E., Pernot, J. P., Falcidieno, B., Giannini, F., and Leon, J. C. 2005. 3D sketching for aesthetic design using fully free-form deformation features. Computers & Graphics, Volume 29, Issue 6, 916--930. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karjalainen, T. M. 2007. It looks like a Toyota: Educational approaches to designing for visual brand recognition. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 67--81.Google Scholar
- Warell, A. 2001. Design syntactics: A functional approach to visual product form. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
- Evans, V. and Chilton, P. 2009. Language, Cognition & Space. Equinox Publishing, London.Google Scholar
- Cooper, R. G. 2001. Winning at new products (3rd Ed.). Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Hekkert, P. 2006. Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in product design. Psychology Science, Volume 48(2), 157--172.Google Scholar
- Crilly, N. 2005. Product aesthetics: Representing designer intent and consumer response. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
- Lewalski, Z. M. 1988. Product Esthetics -- An interpretation for Designers. Carson City, Nevada: Design and Development Engineering Press.Google Scholar
- Jordan, P. 2000. Designing Pleasurable Products. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Heufner, G. 2004. Design basics -- from ideas to products. Zürich: Verlag Niggli AG.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. A. 2004. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Desmet, P. M. A. and Hekkert, P. 2007. Framework of Product Experience. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57--66.Google Scholar
- Warell, A. 2008. Modelling Perceptual Product Experience -- Towards a Cohesive Framework of Presentation and Representation in Design. In Design & Emotion 2008; Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Design & Emotion, October 6--9. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Pierce, C. S. 1931--1966. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Pierce, vols 1--8. In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A. W. Burks (Eds.). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Simon, H. A. 1992. Alternative representations for cognition: Search and Reasoning. In H. L. Pick, Jr., P. van den Broek, & D. C. Knill (Eds.), Cognition: Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 121--142). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Solso, R. L. 1999. Cognition and the Visual Arts. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krippendorff, K. and Butter, R. 1984. Product semantics: Exploring the symbolic qualities of form. Innovation, Vol 3, No. 2.Google Scholar
- Chandler, D. 1994. Semiotics for Beginners. URL http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/ {2006-04-05}.Google Scholar
- Karjalainen, T. M. 2004. Semantic Transformation in Design. Helsinki: University of Art and Design.Google Scholar
- Warell, A. 2006a. Identity recognition in product design: An approach for design management. Proceedings of the 13th International Product Development Management Conference. Milan: Politecnico di Milano. June 11--13.Google Scholar
- Warell, A., Fjellner, C., and Stridsman-Dahlström, J. 2006b. Visual Product Identity: Understanding identity perceptions conveyed by visual product design. In P. M. A. Desmet, M. A. Karlsson, and J. van Erp (Eds.), Design & Emotion 2006; Proceedings of the International Conference on Design and Emotion, September 27--29. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Chen S. E. and Parent R. E. 1989. Shape averaging and its applications to industrial design. (IEEE computer graphics & applications). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Abidin, S. Z., Warell, A., and Liem, A. 2011. Understanding styling activity of automotive designers: A study of manual interpolative morphing through freehand sketching. Proceedings of the 18 th International Conference on Engineering Design, Copenhagen, Denmark: TU Denmark.Google Scholar
- Deng, Z. and Noh, J. 2008. Computer Facial Animation: A Survey. In Z. Deng, and U. Newmann, Data Driven 3D Facial Animation (pp. 1--28). Springer-Verlag, London.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Art & complexity: an exploration of aesthetics
C&C '07: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognitionThis PhD thesis is centred on the idea of complexity as an aesthetic factor. The project aims to explore the role of visual complexity in the making and perception of contemporary art. An experimental methodology combines creative practice with ...
Sketch-based aesthetic product form exploration from existing images using piecewise clothoid curves
We present a new sketch-based product form exploration technique that works from images and sketches of existing products. At the heart of our approach, is a multi-stroke curve beautification method and a curve-based image deformation algorithm. The ...
A study of image colourfulness
CAe '14: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational AestheticsColourfulness is often thought of as a mere measure of quantity of colour, but user studies suggest that there are more factors influencing the perception of colourfulness. Boosting and enhancing colours are operations often performed for improving ...
Comments