skip to main content
10.1145/2079216.2079219acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The significance of form elements: a study of representational content of design sketches

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to understand the significance of form elements through the interpretations of design sketches. These interpretations are provided by designers themselves interpreting expressive characteristics of car images, and by students interpreting the sketches of designers' morphing sequences. In the experimental investigation of the sketching process through morphing sequence exercises, designers used individually driven styles and approaches when creating product form. These approaches produce characteristically different form ideas, which differ (but also show consistency) with respect to type of car category, expression, identity, recognition, format, composition, complexity, etc. Typically, assessment of generated sketch work and ideas is done using relative heuristic evaluation in a comparative design review. Given a large set of automotive sketches, general patterns of styling emphasis can be identified. The paper concludes that perceptions of designers are varied due to the representation format of the ideas as visual hand sketches. The visual hand sketches point out certain meaning and can be categorized with respect to perceptual characteristics according to the PPE framework and suggest that a tool to support evaluation and generation of early design concepts can be developed, and to support the generation of form ideas with desired characteristics for a brand, product category and market.

References

  1. Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., and Clarkson, P. J. 2004. Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, Vol. 25, No. 6, November, pp. 547--577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Cova, B. and Svanfeldt, C. 1993. Societal Innovations and the Postmodern Aestheticization of Everyday Life. International Journal of Research in Marketing 10(3): 297--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chayutsahakij, P. and Poggenpohl, S. 2002. User-Centered Innovation: The Interplay between User-Research and Design Innovation. Proceedings of the European Academy of Management 2nd Annual Conference on Innovative Research in Management (EURAM), Stockholm, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Vredenburg, K., Isensee, S., and Righi, C. 2002. User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Veryzer, R. W. and Borja de Mozota, B. 2005. The Impact of User-Oriented Design on New Product Development: An Examination of Fundamental Relationships. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22: 128--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hekkert, P. and Van Dijk, M. 2003. Designing from Context: Foundations and Applications of the ViP Approach. In: P. Lloyd and H. Christiaans (Eds.) Designing in Context: Proceedings of Design Thinking Research Symposium 5 Delft: DUP Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Verganti, R. 2008. Design Driven Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K. M. 1995. Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review 20 (2): 343--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Shane, S. A. and Ulrich, K. T. 2004. Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science. Management Science 50 (2): 133--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kim, W. C. and Mauborgne, R. 2005. Blue Ocean Strategy: From Theory to Practice. California Management Review 47 (3): 105--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, V. 2000. Co-opting Customer Competence. Harvard Business Review. January--February, 79--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cagan, J., and Vogel, C. M. 2002. Creating breakthrough products: Innovation from product planning to program approval. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Boztepe, S. 2007. User Value: Competing Theories and Models. International Journal of Design Vol 1, No 2 online.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sanders, L. and Simons, G. 2009. A Social Vision for Value Co-creation in Design. Open Source Business Resource, December. Available at http://www.osbr.ca/ojs/index.php/osbr/article/view/1012/973Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dodds, W. B. and Monroe, K. B. 1985. The Effect of Brand and Price Information on Subjective Product Evaluations, in Advances in Consumer Research Volume 12, eds. Elizabeth C. Hirschman and Moris B. Holbrook, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 85--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tovey, M., Porter, S., and Newman, R. 2003. Sketching, concept development and automotive design. Design Studies, 24(2), 135--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Catalano, C. E. 2004. Feature-based methods for free-form surface manipulation in aesthetic engineering. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Genoa, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheutet, V., Catalano, C. E., Pernot, J. P., Falcidieno, B., Giannini, F., and Leon, J. C. 2005. 3D sketching for aesthetic design using fully free-form deformation features. Computers & Graphics, Volume 29, Issue 6, 916--930. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Karjalainen, T. M. 2007. It looks like a Toyota: Educational approaches to designing for visual brand recognition. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 67--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Warell, A. 2001. Design syntactics: A functional approach to visual product form. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans, V. and Chilton, P. 2009. Language, Cognition & Space. Equinox Publishing, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Cooper, R. G. 2001. Winning at new products (3rd Ed.). Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hekkert, P. 2006. Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in product design. Psychology Science, Volume 48(2), 157--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Crilly, N. 2005. Product aesthetics: Representing designer intent and consumer response. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewalski, Z. M. 1988. Product Esthetics -- An interpretation for Designers. Carson City, Nevada: Design and Development Engineering Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jordan, P. 2000. Designing Pleasurable Products. London: Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Heufner, G. 2004. Design basics -- from ideas to products. Zürich: Verlag Niggli AG.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Norman, D. A. 2004. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Desmet, P. M. A. and Hekkert, P. 2007. Framework of Product Experience. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Warell, A. 2008. Modelling Perceptual Product Experience -- Towards a Cohesive Framework of Presentation and Representation in Design. In Design & Emotion 2008; Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Design & Emotion, October 6--9. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Pierce, C. S. 1931--1966. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Pierce, vols 1--8. In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A. W. Burks (Eds.). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Simon, H. A. 1992. Alternative representations for cognition: Search and Reasoning. In H. L. Pick, Jr., P. van den Broek, & D. C. Knill (Eds.), Cognition: Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 121--142). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Solso, R. L. 1999. Cognition and the Visual Arts. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Krippendorff, K. and Butter, R. 1984. Product semantics: Exploring the symbolic qualities of form. Innovation, Vol 3, No. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Chandler, D. 1994. Semiotics for Beginners. URL http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/ {2006-04-05}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Karjalainen, T. M. 2004. Semantic Transformation in Design. Helsinki: University of Art and Design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Warell, A. 2006a. Identity recognition in product design: An approach for design management. Proceedings of the 13th International Product Development Management Conference. Milan: Politecnico di Milano. June 11--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Warell, A., Fjellner, C., and Stridsman-Dahlström, J. 2006b. Visual Product Identity: Understanding identity perceptions conveyed by visual product design. In P. M. A. Desmet, M. A. Karlsson, and J. van Erp (Eds.), Design & Emotion 2006; Proceedings of the International Conference on Design and Emotion, September 27--29. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Chen S. E. and Parent R. E. 1989. Shape averaging and its applications to industrial design. (IEEE computer graphics & applications). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Abidin, S. Z., Warell, A., and Liem, A. 2011. Understanding styling activity of automotive designers: A study of manual interpolative morphing through freehand sketching. Proceedings of the 18 th International Conference on Engineering Design, Copenhagen, Denmark: TU Denmark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Deng, Z. and Noh, J. 2008. Computer Facial Animation: A Survey. In Z. Deng, and U. Newmann, Data Driven 3D Facial Animation (pp. 1--28). Springer-Verlag, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    DESIRE '11: Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design
    October 2011
    358 pages
    ISBN:9781450307543
    DOI:10.1145/2079216

    Copyright © 2011 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 19 October 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader