Gareth Paterson
ABSTRACT
Explicit knowledge of how shape is created is lacking from the research literature. As this is a predominantly visual process it is difficult, if not impossible, to express in words. Substituting shape rules for verbal reports in protocol analysis, however, overcomes this difficulty. Shape rules employed in this way allow practitioners, and researchers, to record and reflect on the otherwise inexpressible processes central to visual creativity.
- Antonsson E K and Cagan J (2001) Preface In: Antonsson E K and Cagan J (eds.) Formal Engineering Design Synthesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Daley J (1982) Design Creativity and the Understanding of Objects, Design Studies 3(3): 133--137.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dorst K and Cross N (2001) Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution, Design Studies 22(5): 425--437.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dorst K and Dijkhuis J (1995) Comparing paradigms for describing design activity, Design Studies 16(2): 261--274.Google ScholarCross Ref
- French M J (1988) Invention and evolution: design in nature and engineering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Goel V (2000) Cognitive Role of Ill-structured Representations in Preliminary Design {online} Available: www.arch.usyd.edu.au/kcdc/books/VR99/goel.html {accessed 27 Nov 2009}.Google Scholar
- Goel V (2010) Neural basis of thinking: laboratory problems versus real-world problems, WIREs Cognitive Science 1(Jul/Aug): 613--621.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goldschmidt and Tatsa (2005) How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity, Design Studies 26(6): 593--611. French M J (1988) Invention and evolution: design in nature and engineering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonson B (2005) Design ideation: the concept sketch in the digital age, Design Studies 26(6): 613--624.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lloyd P, Lawson B and Scott P (1995) Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition? Design Studies 16(2): 237--259.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paterson G (2009) Form Generation in Design, PhD thesis submitted to the Department of Design, Development, Environment and Materials, The Open University, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
- Paterson G and Earl C (2010) Line and Plane to Solid: analyzing their use in design practice through shape rules, In: Gero J S (ed.) Design Computing and Cognition 10: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition, Springer.Google Scholar
- Pinker S (1998) How the Mind Works, Penguin Books, London.Google Scholar
- Rogers Y (2004) Distributed cognition and communication, to appear in Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2nd edn. {online} Available: www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/yrogers/papers/Rogers_DCog04.pdf {accessed 16 Feb 2008}.Google Scholar
- Schön D A (1988) Designing: Rules, types and worlds, Design Studies 9(3): 181--190.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schön D A and Wiggins G (1992) Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies 13(2): 135--156.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simon H (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stiny G and Gips J (1978) Algorithmic Aesthetics: Computer Models for Criticism and Design in the Arts. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Stiny G (1990) What is a design? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 17: 97--103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stiny G (2001) Shape: Talking about seeing and Doing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suwa M, Purcell T and Gero J (1998) Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions, Design Studies 19(4): 455--483.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tovey M (1986) Thinking styles and modelling systems, design Studies 7(1): 20--30.Google Scholar
- Verstijnen I M and Hennessey J M (1998) Sketching and creative discovery, Design Studies 19(4): 519--546.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Estimation of Non-rigid Surface Deformation Using Developable Surface Model
ICPR '10: Proceedings of the 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern RecognitionThere is a strong demand for a method of acquiring a non-rigid shape under deformation with high accuracy and high resolution. However, this is difficult to achieve because of performance limitations in measurement hardware. In this paper, we propose a ...
Local three-dimensional shape-preserving smoothing without shrinkage
ICIP '97: Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '97) 3-Volume Set-Volume 1 - Volume 1Design of a novel three-dimensional (3D) shape-preserving smoothing approach is described. Three-dimensional surfaces are smoothed without shrinkage artifacts typical for many other approaches. Using our new representation of the 3D surface, the process ...
Analysis of Shapes to Measure Surfaces
ICINCO 2015: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 2This paper presents a method to analyse 3D planar surfaces and to measure variations on it. The method is oriented to the detection of deformations on the elastic object surfaces formed by flat faces. These deformations are usually caused when two ...
Comments