Katja Thoring
ABSTRACT
In this article, we analyse the concept of design thinking with its process, the team structure, the work environment, the specific culture, and certain brainstorming rules and techniques. The goal of this work is to understand how the creative mechanisms of design thinking work and how they might be improved. For this purpose, we refer to the idea of creativity as an evolutionary process, which is determined by generation (i.e., recombination and mutation), selection, and retention of ideas. We evaluate the design thinking process in terms of its capabilities to activate these mechanisms, and we propose possible improvements. This paper contributes to a better understanding of creative design processes in general and the design thinking process in particular, and will serve as a foundation for further research about creative mechanisms.
- Altshuller, G., Shulyak, L. and Rodman, S. 40 principles: TRIZ keys to innovation. Technical Innovation Center, Worcester MA, 1997.Google Scholar
- Berger, W. CAD Monkeys, Dinosaur Babies, and T-Shaped People: Inside the World of Design Thinking and How It Can Spark Creativity and Innovation. Penguin Press, London, 2009.Google Scholar
- Brown, T. Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business, New York, 2009.Google Scholar
- Brown, T. Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 6 (2008), 84--92.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, R. Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8, 2 (1992), 5--21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Campbell, D. T. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought asin other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67 (1960), 380--400.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Campbell, D. T. Evolutionary epistemology. in Schilpp, P. A. ed. The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, La Salle, IL, 1974, 413--463.Google Scholar
- Carleton, T. and Cockayne, W., The power of prototypes in foresight engineering. in Proceedings from the 17th International Conference of Engineering Design (ICED), (Stanford, CA, USA, 2009).Google Scholar
- Carleton, T. and Leifer, L., Stanford's ME310 Course as an Evolution of Engineering Design. in Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Design Conference--Competitive Design, (Cranfield University, 2009).Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. Creativity. Harper, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
- Darwin, C. On the origin of the species by means of natural selection: or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London, 1859.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1976.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, R. and Bendal, D. S. Universal Darwinism. in Evolution from Molecules to Men, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983, 403--425.Google Scholar
- Dobson, M. Creative Project Management. McGraw-Hill Professional, York City, 2010.Google Scholar
- Dunne, D. and Martin, R. Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 4 (2006), 512--523.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. in Schopf, T. J. ed. Models in paleobiology, Freeman Cooper, San Francisco, 1972, 82--115.Google Scholar
- Findlay, C. S. and Lumsden, C. J. The creative mind: Toward an evolutionary theory of discovery and innovation. Journal of Social and Biological Systems, 11, 1 (1988), 3--55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gabora, L. The Beer Can Theory of Creativity. in Bentley, P. and Corne, D. eds. Creative evolutionary systems, Morgan Kauffman, San Francisco, CA, 2002, 147--161. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gabora, L. Creative thought as a nondarwinian evolutionary process. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 4 (2005), 262--283.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gero, J. S. Creativity, emergence and evolution in design. Knowledge-Based Systems, 9, 7 (1996), 435--448.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gregor, S. The nature of theory in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 30, 3 (2006), 611--611. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holland, J. H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1975.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holt, K. The role of the user in product innovation. Technovation, 7, 3 (1988), 249--258.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hybs, I. and Gero, J. S. An evolutionary process model of design. Design Studies, 13, 3 (1992), 273--290.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnstone, K. Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre. Theatre Arts Books, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
- Kelley, T. and Littman, J. The art of innovation: lessons in creativity from IDEO, America's leading design firm. Currency/Doubleday, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
- Martindale, C. Darwinian, Lamarckian, and Rational Creativity. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 4 (1999), 340--341.Google Scholar
- Müller, R. M. and Thoring, K., A Typology of Design Knowledge: A Theoretical Framework. in AMCIS 2010 Proceedings, (Lima, Peru, 2010), AIS.Google Scholar
- Müller, R. M. and Thoring, K., Understanding Artifact Knowledge in Design Science: Prototypes and Products as Knowledge Repositories. in AMCIS 2011 Proceedings, (Detroit, USA, 2011), AIS.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982.Google Scholar
- Osborn, A. F. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. Scribeners and Sons, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
- Plattner, H., Meinel, C. and Leifer, L. Design Thinking. Springer, Berlin, 2011.Google Scholar
- Plattner, H., Meinel, C. and Weinberg, U. Design Thinking. mi-Wirtschaftsbuch, Munich, 2009.Google Scholar
- Popper, K. R. Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972.Google Scholar
- Radnitzky, G., Bartley, W. W. and Popper, K. R. Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge. Open Court, La Salle, 1987.Google Scholar
- Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4, 2 (1973), 155--169.Google Scholar
- Simonton, D. K. Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10 (1999), 309--328.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simonton, D. K. Donald Campbell's model of the creative process: Creativity as blind variation and selective retention. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 3 (1998), 153--158.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simonton, D. K. Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford, New York, 1999.Google Scholar
- Thoring, K. and Müller, R. M., Creating Knowledge in Design Thinking: The Relationship of Process Steps and Knowledge Types. in Proceedings of IASDR2011, the 4th World Conference on Design Research, (Delft, NL, 2011).Google Scholar
- Thoring, K. and Müller, R. M., Understanding Design Thinking: A Process Model based on Method Engineering. in International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, (City University, London, UK, 2011).Google Scholar
Recommendations
Creative thinking in design: an introduction
SoD '07: Proceedings of the 2007 Symposium on Science of DesignThe creative aspect of designing is often regarded as mysterious. We human beings have a long history of creative design ability, as evidenced in the artifacts of previous civilisations and in the continuing traditions of vernacular design and ...
Understanding Creative Thinking Processes in Searching for New Ideas
CHIIR '22: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Human Information Interaction and RetrievalCreative thinking processes involve a set of cognitive operations and behaviors people engage to generate new ideas and solutions. Information searching is an integral part of the creative thinking process. The purpose of this study is to discover the ...
Patterns for creative thinking: idea generation
EuroPLoP '15: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Pattern Languages of ProgramsCreativity is an important skill in many domains. It is required to innovate, develop new ideas, get deeper insights, address challenges and resolve conflicts. In this context we understand creativity as the process of creating and developing new and ...
Comments