skip to main content
10.1145/2079216.2079244acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The design researcher in quandary: the conflicting roles of being both a designer and a design researcher

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the field of practice-based research we articulate the dilemma that emerges as the creative designer embraces the role of being an interaction design researcher. We exemplify the dilemma in a specific design case originating from a PhD project. In this case, we use sketching to illustrate how the design researcher embodies the creative designer at all times. We show how the dilemma becomes tangible in the conversation with the material when having to manage a set of design constraints, concerns and sensibilities. We acknowledge that when taking on both roles at the same time there are two different clients with different agendas to serve. Where one is concerned with making the best possible product the other pertains to the contribution of knowledge. Finally, we state the importance of having a strong research question when balancing a research program while at the same time creating a new, desired reality.

References

  1. Brandt E. and Binder, T. Experimental design research: genealogy -intervention -- argument. International Ass. of Design Research, IASDR07, Hong Kong, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Buchanan, R. Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, vol. 8, Apr. 1992, 5--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bodker, S. When Second Wave HCI meets Third Wave Challenges, NordiCHI, 2006, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cross, N. Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science. Design Issues, vol. 17, 2001, pp. 49--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dindler, C. Fictional space in participatory design of engaging interactive environments. PhD dissertation, Faculty of the Humanities at Aarhus University, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fallman D. The Interaction Design Research Triangle of Design Practice, Design Studies, and Design Exploration. Design Issues, vol. 24, 2008, 4--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fogtmann, M. H. Kinesthetic empathy interaction--exploring the possibilities of psychomotor abilities in interaction design. In Proc. of the second international Workshop on Physicality, Lancaster: 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fogtmann, M. H, "Designing bodily engaging games - learning from sports. Accepted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Frayling, C. Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, vol. 1, 1993, 1--5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldschmidt, G. The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, vol. 4, 1991, 123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Larssen, A. T., Robertson, T. and Edwards, J. The feel dimension of technology interaction: exploring tangibles through movement and touch. Proc. of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, Baton Rouge, Louisiana: ACM, 2007, 271--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Löwgren, J. Applying design methodology to software development. Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, & techniques - DIS '95, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States: 1995, 87--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ludvigsen, M. Designing for social interaction: physical, co-located social computing. PhD dissertation, Aarhus School of architecture, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nelson, H. G. and Stolterman, E. The design way: intentional change in an unpredictable world: foundations and fundamentals of design competence, Educational Technology, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, vol. 4, 1973, 155--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Schön, D. A. Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research in Engineering Design, vol. 3, 1992, 131--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Van der Lugt, R. Functions of sketching in design idea generation meetings. Proc. of the 4th conference on Creativity & cognition, Loughborough, UK: ACM, 2002, 72--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Wolf, T. V., Rode, J. A., Sussman J. and Kellogg, W. A. Dispelling "design" as the black art of CHI. Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, Montreal, Canada: ACM, 2006, 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi J. and Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, San Jose, California, USA: ACM, 2007, 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    DESIRE '11: Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design
    October 2011
    358 pages
    ISBN:9781450307543
    DOI:10.1145/2079216

    Copyright © 2011 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 19 October 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader