skip to main content
10.1145/2087756.2087773acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Antialiasing recovery for edit propagation

Published:11 December 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Edit propagation on images/videos has become more and more popular in recent years due to simple and intuitive interaction. It propagates sparse user edits to the whole data following the policy that nearby regions with similar appearances receive similar edits. While it gives a friendly editing mode, it often produces aliasing artifacts on edge pixels. In this paper, we present a simple algorithm to resolve this artifact for edit propagation. The key in our method is a new representation called Antialias Map, in which we represent each antialiased edge pixel by a linear interpolation of neighboring pixels around the edge, and instead of considering the original edge pixels in solving edit propagation, we consider those neighboring pixels. We demonstrate that our work is effective in preserving antialiased edges for edit propagation and could be easily integrated with existing edit propagation methods such as [Xu et al. 2009a].

References

  1. Akenine-möller, T., Haines, E., and Hoffman, N. 2008. Real-Time Rendering 3rd ed. AK peters.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. An, X., and Pellacini, F. 2008. Appprop: all-pairs appearance-space edit propagation. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3, 40:1--40:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brabec, S., and Seidel, H. P. 2001. Hardware-accelerated rendering of antialiased shadows with shadow maps. Computer Graphics International 2001. Proceedings, 209--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cant, R. J., and Shrubsole, P. A. 2000. Texture potential mip mapping, a new high-quality texture antialiasing algorithm. ACM Trans. Graph 19, 3, 164--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chen, J., Paris, S., and Durand, F. 2007. Real-time edge-aware image processing with the bilateral grid. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Farbman, Z., Fattal, R., and Lischinski, D. 2010. Diffusion maps for edge-aware image editing. ACM Trans. Graph. 29 (December), 145:1--145:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fattal, R., Carroll, R., and Agrawala, M. 2009. Edge-based image coarsening. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 1, 6:1--6:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fattal, R. 2009. Edge-avoiding wavelets and their applications. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 3, 22:1--22:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hyvärinen, A., Hurri, J., and Hoyer, P. O. 2009. Natural image statistics: A probabilistic approach to early computational vision. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Johannes, K., and Dani, L. 2011. Depixelizing pixel art. ACM Trans. Graph. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jon, P. E., Marcus, D. W., Martin, W., and Paul, F. L. 2000. Implementing an anisotropic texture filter. Computers and Graphics 24, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lai, Y.-K., Hu, S.-M., and Martin, R. R. 2009. Automatic and topology-preserving gradient mesh generation for image vectorization. ACM Trans. Graph 28, 3, 85:1--85:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Levin, A., Lischinski, D., and Weiss, Y. 2004. Colorization using optimization. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 689--694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Li, Y., Adelson, E., and Agarwala, A. 2008. Scribbleboost: Adding classification to edge-aware interpolation of local image and video adjustments. Computer Graphics Forum 27, 4, 1255--1264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Li, Y., Ju, T., and Hu, S.-M. 2010. Instant propagation of sparse edits on images and videos. Computer Graphics Forum 29, 7, 2049--2054.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lischinski, D., Farbman, Z., Uyttendaele, M., and Szeliski, R. 2006. Interactive local adjustment of tonal values. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 646--653. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pellacini, F., and Lawrence, J. 2007. Appwand: editing measured materials using appearance-driven optimization. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Pharr, M., and Humphreys, G. 2004. Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Reeves, W. T., Salesin, D. H., and Cook, R. L. 1987. Rendering antialiased shadows with depth maps. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 21, 4, 283--291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Reinhard, E., Ward, G., Pattanaik, S., and Debevec, P. 2005. High dynamic range imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Reshetov, A. 2009. Morphological antialiasing. Proceedings of ACM Symposium on High Performance Graphics, 109--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Van-hateren, J. H., and Vander-schaaf, A. 1998. Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 265, 359--366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Welsh, T., Ashikhmin, M., and Mueller, K. 2002. Transferring color to greyscale images. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3, 277--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Xiao, X., and Ma, L. 2006. Color transfer in correlated color space. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM international conference on Virtual reality continuum and its applications, 305--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Xu, K., Li, Y., Ju, T., Hu, S.-M., and Liu, T.-Q. 2009. Efficient affinity-based edit propagation using k-d tree. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 5, 118:1--118:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Xu, K., Wang, J., Tong, X., Hu, S.-M., and Guo, B. 2009. Edit propagation on bidirectional texture functions. Computer Graphics Forum 28, 7, 1871--1877.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Yang, L., Sander, P. V., Lawrence, J., and Hoppe, H. 2011. Antialiasing recovery. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 3, 22:1--22:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Yatziv, L., and Sapiro, G. 2006. Fast image and video colorization using chrominance blending. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15, 5, 1120--1129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Zhang, S.-H., Chen, T., Zhang, Y.-F., Hu, S.-M., and Martin, R. R. 2009. Vectorizing cartoon animations. Visualization and Computer Graphics 15, 4, 618--629. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    VRCAI '11: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry
    December 2011
    617 pages
    ISBN:9781450310604
    DOI:10.1145/2087756

    Copyright © 2011 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 December 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate51of107submissions,48%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGGRAPH '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader