skip to main content
10.1145/2090236.2090253acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesitcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bounds on locally testable codes with unique tests

Published:08 January 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Unique Games Conjecture (UGC) is an important open problem in the research of PCPs and hardness of approximation. The conjecture is a strengthening of the PCP Theorem, predicting the existence of a special type of PCP verifiers: 2-query verifiers that only make unique tests. Moreover, the UGC predicts that such PCP verifiers can have almost-perfect completeness and low-soundness.

The computational complexity notion of a PCP is closely related to the combinatorial notion of a Locally Testable Code (LTC). LTCs are error-correcting codes with codeword testers that only make a constant number of queries to the tested word. All known PCP constructions use LTCs as building blocks. Furthermore, to obtain PCPs with certain properties, one usually uses LTCs with corresponding properties.

In light of the strong connection between PCPs and LTCs, one may conjecture the existence of LTCs with properties similar to the ones required by the UGC. In this work we show limitations on such LTCs: We consider 2-query LTCs with codeword testers that only make unique tests. Roughly speaking, we show that any such LTC with relative distance close to 1, almost-perfect completeness and low-soundness, is of constant size.

While our result does not imply anything about the correctness of the UGC, it does show some limitations of unique tests, compared, for example, to projection tests.

References

  1. Sanjeev Arora, Carsten Lund, Rajeev Motwani, Madhu Sudan, and Mario Szegedy. Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems. Journal of the ACM, 45(3):501--555, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sanjeev Arora and Shmuel Safra. Probabilistic checking of proofs: a new characterization of NP. Journal of the ACM, 45(1):70--122, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sanjeev Arora and Madhu Sudan. Improved low-degree testing and its applications. Combinatorica, 23(3):365--426, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. László Babai, Lance Fortnow, and Carsten Lund. Non-deterministic exponential time has two-prover interactive protocols. Computational Complexity, 1:3--40, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Eli Ben-Sasson, Oded Goldreich, Prahladh Harsha, Madhu Sudan, and Salil P. Vadhan. Robust PCPs of proximity, shorter PCPs, and applications to coding. SIAM Journal on Computing, 36(4):889--974, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eli Ben-Sasson, Oded Goldreich, and Madhu Sudan. Bounds on 2-query codeword testing. RANDOM-APPROX, pages 216--227, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Shuchi Chawla, Robert Krauthgamer, Ravi Kumar, Yuval Rabani, and D. Sivakumar. On the hardness of approximating multicut and sparsest-cut. Computational Complexity, 15(2):94--114, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Irit Dinur, Eldar Fischer, Guy Kindler, Ran Raz, and Shmuel Safra. PCP characterizations of NP: towards a polynomially-small error-probability. STOC, pages 29--40, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Irit Dinur, Elchanan Mossel, and Oded Regev. Conditional hardness for approximate coloring. STOC, pages 344--353, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Uriel Feige, Shafi Goldwasser, Laszlo Lovász, Shmuel Safra, and Mario Szegedy. Interactive proofs and the hardness of approximating cliques. Journal of the ACM, 43(2):268--292, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Oded Goldreich and Madhu Sudan. Locally testable codes and PCPs of almost-linear length. Journal of the ACM, 53(4):558--655, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Venkatesan Guruswami. On 2-query codeword testing with near-perfect completeness. ISAAC, pages 267--276, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Subhash Khot. On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games. STOC, pages 767--775, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Subhash Khot, Guy Kindler, Elchanan Mossel, and Ryan O'Donnell. Optimal inapproximability results for MAX-CUT and other 2-variable CSPs? Journal of the ACM, 37(1):319--357, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Subhash Khot and Oded Regev. Vertex cover might be hard to approximate to within 2-ε. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 74(3):335--349, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Subhash Khot and Nisheeth K. Vishnoi. The unique games conjecture, integrality gap for cut problems and embeddability of negative type metrics into l 1. FOCS, pages 53--62, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dana Moshkovitz and Ran Raz. Sub-constant error probabilistically checkable proof of almost linear size. ECCC Report TR07-026, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dana Moshkovitz and Ran Raz. Sub-constant error low degree test of almost-linear size. SIAM Journal on Computing, 38(1):140--180, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dana Moshkovitz and Ran Raz. Two query PCP with sub-constant error. FOCS, pages 314--323, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Elchanan Mossel, Ryan O'Donnell, and Krzysztof Oleszkiewicz. Noise stability of functions with low influences: invariance and optimality. FOCS, pages 21--30, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Prasad Raghavendra. Optimal algorithms and inapproximability results for every CSP? STOC, pages 245--254, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ran Raz. A parallel repetition theorem. SIAM Journal on Computing, 27(3):763--803, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ran Raz and Shmuel Safra. A sub-constant error-probability low-degree test, and a sub-constant error-probability PCP characterization of NP. STOC, pages 475--484, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bounds on locally testable codes with unique tests

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ITCS '12: Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference
            January 2012
            516 pages
            ISBN:9781450311151
            DOI:10.1145/2090236

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 January 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            ITCS '12 Paper Acceptance Rate39of93submissions,42%Overall Acceptance Rate172of513submissions,34%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader