skip to main content
10.1145/2093256.2093319acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescogartConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Model for the correlation between quality of service and experience in cognitive radio networks

Published:26 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes a methodology for the development of a correlation model between Quality of Service and Experience in cognitive radio networks. The aim of this research is to provide the cognitive radio networks ecosystem player the tools to assess the contribution of the network performance to the overall level of user's satisfaction. The performance parameters of several types of applications are addressed to highlight how delay, delay variation and information loss affect the service quality. Furthermore we thoroughly discuss, evaluate and test the proposed methodology, i.e., non-linear regression and genetic algorithms, by comparing it to the IETF recommended games MUSE G-Model. The obtained results are very promising. Future work includes verifying the effectiveness of the proposed methodology in the context of more complex fitting equations.

References

  1. B. Lane, "Cognitive Radio Technologies in the Commercial Arena," in Proc. of FCC Workshop on Cognitive Radio Technologies, Washington, DC, USA, May 19, 2003. (http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1648733)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. V. Srivastava, M. Motani, "Cross-layer design: a survey and the road ahead", IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 86--95, Jan. 2006 (available online DOI 10.1109/MCOM.2005.1561928).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Won-Yeol Lee, I. F. Akyildiz, "Optimal spectrum sensing framework for cognitive radio networks," IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 3845--3857, Oct. 2008 (available online DOI 10.1109/T-WC.2008.070391). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Mitola, J. G. Q. Maguire, "Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal," IEEE Personal Commun., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 13--18, Aug. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. L. Musavian, S. Aissa, S. Lambotharan, "Effective capacity for interference and delay constrained cognitive radio relay channels," IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol.9, no.5, pp.1698--1707, May 2010 (available online DOI 10.1109/TCOMM.2010.05.090600). (Yanxiao Zhao, Min Song, Chunsheng Xin, "Delay analysis for cognitive radio networks supporting heterogeneous traffic", in Proc. of IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), 2011 8th Annual, pp.215--223, 27--30 June 2011 (available online DOI 10.1109/SAHCN.2011.5984901). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shiang Hsien-Po, M. van der Schaar, "Distributed Resource Management in Multihop Cognitive Radio Networks for Delay-Sensitive Transmission," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 941--953, Feb. 2009 (available online DOI 10.1109/TVT.2008.925308).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. B. Jashni, A. A. Tadaion, F. Ashtiani, "Dynamic link/frequency selection in multi-hop cognitive radio networks for delay sensitive applications," IEEE 17th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT), 2010, pp. 128--132, 4--7 April 2010 (available online DOI 10.1109/ICTEL.2010.5478652). COGEU, FP7 ICT-2009.1.1: COgnitive radio systems for efficient sharing of TV white spaces in EUropean context, D8.1 Dissemination and use plan report, Jan 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ITU-T, End-user multimedia QoS categories, Recommendation of the ITU-T, Recommendation G.1010, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 3GPP, TS 22.105 (2008--12) Services and service capabilities (Release 9), 3GPP Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects, Services and service capabilities, V9.0.0, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. EU-MESH: Enhanced, Ubiquitous, and Dependable Broadband Access using MESH Networks, Public Deliverables, "D2.1 Usage Scenarios and Application Requirements", ICT-215320-EU-MESH-D2.1, April 2008. http://www.eu-mesh.eu/files/public_deliverables/ICT-215320-EU-MESH-D2.1_v1.4-final.pdf (April 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. WiMAX Forum: WiMAX System Evaluation Methodology. Version 2.1, July 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniel Robalo, Fernando J. Velez, Orlando Cabral, Marilia Curado, Susana Sargento, Deployment Scenarios and Characterization Parameters for Concatenated Multiple Mesh Networks Applications, UBIQUIMESH report, Instituto de Telecomunicações, Covilhã, Portugal, Jan. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. F. Wattimena, R. E. Kooij, J. M. van Vugt, O. K. Ahmed, "Predicting the perceived quality of a First Person Shooter: the Quake IV G-model", in Proc. of NetGames 2006, 30--31 October 2006, Singapore (available online DOI 10.1145/1230040.1230052). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. DSL Forum, Technical Report TR-126: Triple-play Services Quality of Experience (QoE) Requirements, Dec. 2006. (www.broadband-forum.org/technical/download/TR-126.pdf)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Model for the correlation between quality of service and experience in cognitive radio networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CogART '11: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Cognitive Radio and Advanced Spectrum Management
        October 2011
        372 pages
        ISBN:9781450309127
        DOI:10.1145/2093256

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 October 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader