skip to main content
10.1145/2093698.2093817acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisabelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Survey: gap-filling methods for the positron emission tomograph sinograms

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this study, we review the sinogram domain gap-filling methods for the positron emission tomograph (PET) data. We restricted our literature search to the published methods for the diamond shaped gaps which exist in the PENN-PET (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA), the MDAPET (M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA), and the ECAT HRRT (CTI PET Systems, Knoxville, TN, USA) PET scanner sinogram data. We only included the methods which were also tested with the real scanner data (either physical phantom data or real patient data) besides the numerical phantom data. We categorized the methods into three classes: 1) interpolation methods; 2) model based methods, and 3) transform based methods. The general characteristics of the methods are explained. For the detailed information on the gap-filling methods such as implementation details, the reader should refer to the original article in which that gap-filling method was proposed. We discuss the performances of the gap-filling methods under the light of the corresponding comparison articles in the literature.

References

  1. P. E. Kinahan and J. G. Rogers, "Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol.36, no.1, pp.964--968, February 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. L. A. Shepp and Y. Vardi, "Maximum likelihood reconstruction in positron emission tomography," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 113--122, October 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. H. M. Hudson and R. S. Larkin, "Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 601--609, December 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. C. Comtat, F. Bataille, C. Michel, J. P. Jones, M. Sibomana, L. Janeiro, R. Trebossen, "OSEM-3D reconstruction strategies for the ECAT HRRT," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Record (MIC2004), vol.6, no., pp. 3492--3496 Vol. 6, 16--22 October 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Comtat, F. C. Sureau, M. Sibomana, I. K. Hong, N. Sjoholm, R. Trebossen, "Image based resolution modeling for the HRRT OSEM reconstructions software," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Record (MIC2008), pp.4120--4123, 19--25 October 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Michel, M. Schmand, X. Liu, M. Sibomana, S. Vollmar, C. Knoss, M. Lercher, C. Watson, D. Newport, M. Casey, M. Defrise, K. Wienhard, and W. D. Heiss, "Reconstruction strategies for the HRRT," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Record (MIC2000), vol.2, pp.15/207--15/212, Lyon, France, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Michel, X. Liu, S. Sanabria, M. Lonneux, M. Sibomana, A. Bol, C. Comtat, P. E. Kinahan, D. W. Townsend, and M. Defrise, "Weighted schemes applied to 3D-OSEM reconstruction in PET," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Record (MIC1999), vol. 3, pp. 1152--1157, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. E. Kinahan, J. A. Fessler, J. S. Karp, "Statistical image reconstruction in PET with compensation for missing data," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol.44, no.4, pp.1552--1557, August 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. G. Muehllehner and J. S. Karp, "A positron camera using position- sensitive detectors: PENN-PET," Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 27, pp. 90--98, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. H. Baghaei, H. Li, J. Uribe, Y. Wang, W.-H. Wong, "Compensation of missing projection data for MDAPET camera," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Record (MIC2000), vol.3, pp.17/41--17/45, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H. W. A. M. de Jong, F. H. P. van Velden, R. W. Kloet, F. L. Buijs, R. Boellaard, and A. A. Lammertsma, "Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner," Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 52, pp. 1505--1526, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. K. Wienhard, M. Schmand, M. E. Casey, K. Baker, J. Bao, L. Eriksson, W. F. Jones, C. Knoess, M. Lenox, M. Lercher, P. Luk, C. Michel, J. H. Reed, N. Richerzhagen, J. Treffert, S. Vollmar, J. W. Young, W. D. Heiss, and R. Nut, "The ECAT HRRT: Performance and first clinical application of the new high resolution research tomograph," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 104--110, February 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Defrise, P. E. Kinahan, D. W. Townsend, C. Michel, M. Sibomana, and D. F. Newport, "Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 145--158, April 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Forma, U. Tuna, and U. Ruotsalainen, "Estimation of rigid body transform parameters for the ECAT HRRT data without image reconstruction," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Record (MIC2010), pp. 3534--3540, Knoxville, TN, USA, 30 October -- 6 November 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Streun, G. Brandenburg, H. Larue, C. Parl, K. Ziemons, "The data acquisition system of ClearPET neuro - a small animal PET scanner," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 53, no.3, pp. 700--703, June 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. T. M. Lehmann, C. Gonner, and K. Spitzer, "Survey: interpolation methods in medical image processing," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.18, no.11, pp.10491075, Nov. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. H. Baghaei, H. Li, Y. Zhang, R. A. Ramirez, S. Liu, C. Wang, A. Shaohui, and W-H Wong, "An evaluation of missing data compensation methods for a PET camera by comparing to no-gap data," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Record (MIC2008), pp.5273--5276, 19--25 October 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. H. W. A. M. de Jong, R. Boellaard, C. Knoess, M. Lenox, C. Michel, M. Casey and A. A. Lammertsma, "Correction methods for missing data in sinograms of the HRRT PET scanner," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1452--1456, October 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. F. H. P. van Velden, R. W. Kloet, B. N. M. Van Berckel, C. F. M. Molthoff, A. A. Lammertsma, and R. Boellaard, "Gap filling strategies for 3D-FBP reconstructions of high resolution research tomograph Scans," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 934--942, July 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Loukiala, U. Tuna, S. Beer, S. Jahnke, and U. Ruotsalainen, "Gap-filling methods for 3D PlanTIS data," Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, pp. 6125--6139, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. U. Tuna, S. Peltonen, and U. Ruotsalainen, "Interpolation for the Gap-Filling of the HRRT PET Sinograms by Using the Slices in the Direction of the Radial Samples," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Record (MIC2009), pp. 3273--3279, Orlando, Florida, USA, 25--31 October 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. U. Tuna, J. Johansson, and U. Ruotsalainen, "Comparison of 3D-RP and 3D-OPOSEM Reconstructions of the ECAT HRRT PET Data," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Record (MIC2010), pp. 3511--3515, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA, 30 October -- 6 November 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. B. Gundlich, S. Weber, and M. Oehler, "Compensation strategies for PET scanners with unconventional scanner geometry," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Record (MIC2005), vol. 5, pp. 2524--2528, 23--29 October 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. M. Ollinger and J. S. Karp, "An evaluation of three algorithms for reconstructing images from data with missing projections," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 629--634, February 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. P. Rattey and A. Lindgren, "Sampling the 2-D Radon transform,"," IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-29, no. 5, pp. 994--1002, October 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. P. R. Edholm, R. M. Lewitt, and B. Lindholm, "Novel properties of the Fourier decomposition of the sinogram," Proceedings of International Workshop Physics and Engineering of Computerized Multidimensional Imaging and Processing, SPIE, vol. 671, pp 8--18, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. S. Karp, G. Muehllehner, and R. M. Lewitt, "Constrained Fourier space method for compensation of missing data in emission computed tomography," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21--25, March 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. U. Tuna, S. Peltonen, and U. Ruotsalainen, "Data estimation for the ECAT HRRT sinograms by utilizing the DCT domain," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Record (MIC2008), pp. 5076--5080, 19--25 October 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. U. Tuna, S. Peltonen, and U. Ruotsalainen, "Gap-Filling for the High-Resolution PET Sinograms With a Dedicated DCT-Domain Filter," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 830--839, March 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Survey: gap-filling methods for the positron emission tomograph sinograms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ISABEL '11: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies
      October 2011
      949 pages
      ISBN:9781450309134
      DOI:10.1145/2093698

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader