skip to main content
10.1145/2093698.2093872acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisabelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Clinical communication preferences in an operating room suite: a proposed information-communication technology framework

Published:26 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Background: A Hands-free Communication Device (HCD) system is an information and communication technology (ICT) being implemented to help OR staff respond to emergency situations. Methods: We purposefully sampled 18 OR staff to participate in semi-structured interviews and observations. Interview and observation data were transcribed and analyzed using a constant comparison method.

Results: OR staff described benefits and challenges associated with integrating the HCD system with the variety of already available (ICTs). Some subjects described sometimes-burdensome mental processes determining what technology to use given a particular clinical scenario.

Discussion: We propose a model that frames the decision-making process by which users determine which communication modality to use, given the perceived urgency of a communication, and the perceived availability of an intended message recipient.

Conclusion: Developers and implementers would do well to consider an ICT's impact on how it accounts for the urgency of communication, the availability of intended recipients, and users' abilities to integrate the ICT with already existing modalities.

References

  1. Alvarez, G. and Coiera, E. 2006. Interdisciplinary communication: an uncharted source of medical error? Journal of Critical Care. 21, 3 (Sep. 2006), 236--242; discussion 242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ash, J. S. et al. 2004. Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 11, 2 (Mar. 2004), 104--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Breslin, S. et al. 2004. Wireless Technology Improves Nursing Workflow and Communications. Computers Informatics Nursing. 22, 5 (2004), 275--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Campbell, E. M. et al. 2006. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 13, 5 (Oct. 2006), 547--556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kuruzovich, J. et al. 2008. Wireless communication role in patient response time: a study of vocera integration with a nurse call system. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN. 26, 3 (Jun. 2008), 159--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Reddy, M. C. et al. 2005. Technology, work, and information flows: lessons from the implementation of a wireless alert pager system. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 38, 3 (Jun. 2005), 229--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Richardson, J. E. and Ash, J. S. 2010. The effects of hands-free communication device systems: communication changes in hospital organizations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 17, 1 (Feb. 2010), 91--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Richardson, J. E. et al. 2008. The effects of hands free communication devices on clinical communication: balancing communication access needs with user control. AMIA... Annual Symposium Proceedings/AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium. (2008), 621--625.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Richardson, J. E. et al. 2011. The effects of a hands-free communication device system in a surgical suite. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 18, 1 (Feb. 2011), 70--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sittig, D. F. et al. 2005. Emotional Aspects of Computer-based Provider Order Entry: A Qualitative Study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 12, 5 (2005), 561--567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. St. Jacques, P. et al. 2006. Evaluation of a hands-free wireless communication device in the perioperative environment. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association. 12, 1 (Feb. 2006), 42--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Vandenkerkhof, E. et al. 2009. Evaluation of an Innovative Communication Technology in an Acute Care Setting. Computers Informatics Nursing. 27, 4 (2009), 254-26210.1097/NCN.0b013e3181a91bf6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Clinical communication preferences in an operating room suite: a proposed information-communication technology framework

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                ISABEL '11: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies
                October 2011
                949 pages
                ISBN:9781450309134
                DOI:10.1145/2093698

                Copyright © 2011 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 26 October 2011

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article
              • Article Metrics

                • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
                • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

                Other Metrics

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader