skip to main content
10.1145/2095667.2095685acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesamConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Examining effects of acoustic feedback on perception and modification of movement patterns in on-water rowing training

Published:07 September 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a concept for providing acoustic feedback during on-water training to elite rowers and its implementation into the training process. The final aim was to improve the mean boat velocity by a reduction of intra-cyclic interruptions in the boat acceleration. It was assumed to enhance athletes' perception for the modification of movement patterns and control in technique training because sound conveys time-critical structures subliminally. That is of crucial importance for the precision of modifying movements to improve their execution. Advances in technology allow the design for innovative feedback systems to communicate feedback information audibly to athletes. The acoustic feedback system Sofirow was designed and field-tested with elite athletes. The device presents the boat acceleration-time trace audibly and online to athletes and coaches. The results showed a significant increase in the mean boat velocity during the sections with acoustic feedback compared to the sections without. It is thus very supportive to implement acoustic feedback regularly into training processes for elite athletes. A behavioral dynamics approach was invoked to provide a theoretical basis for this concept.

References

  1. Brown, S.2003. Biomusicology and three biological paradoxes about music. Bull Psych, 4, 15--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Karageorghis, C. I and Terry, P. C. 1997. The psychophysical effects of music in sport and exercise: a review. J. Sport Beh. 20, 54--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Eds). 1992. Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Levitin, D. J. 2008. This Is Your Brain on Music: Understanding a Human Obsession. Atlantic Books, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Auhagen, W. 2008. Rhythmus und Timing. In Bruhn, H., Kopiez, R. and Lehmann, A. C. (Eds.). Musikpsychologie. Das neue Handbuch, Rowohlt Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg, 437--457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Effenberg, A. O. 2001. Multimodal Convergent Information Enhances Perception Accuracy of Human Movement Pattern. In Proc. 6 th Ann. Congress of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS), Sport und Buch, Strauss, 122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kramer, G., Walker, B., Bonebright, T., Cook, P., Flowers, J., Miner, N. and Neuhoff, J. 1999. Sonification Report: Status of the Field and Research Agenda. NSF Sonification White Paper- Master 12/13/98, 5 http://sonify.psych.gatech.edu/publications/pdfs/1999-NSF-Report.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Levitin, D. and Cook, P. 1996. Memory for musical tempo: Additional evidence that auditory memory is absolute. J. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 927--935.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Thaut, M. H. 2005. Rhythm, music and the brain: Scientific foundations and clinical applications. New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischinger, T. and Kopiez, R. 2008. Wirkungsphänomene des Rhythmus. In Bruhn, H., Kopiez, R. and Lehmann, A. C. (Eds.). Musikpsychologie. Das neue Handbuch, Rowohlt Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg, 458--475.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mattes, K. and Böhmert, W. 1995. Biomechanisch gestütztes Feedbacktraining im Rennboot mit dem "Processor Coach System-3" (PCS-3). In Krug, J. and Minow, H.-J. (Eds.). Sportliche Leistung und Techniktraining. 1. Gemeinsames Symposium der dvs-Sektionen Biomechanik, Sportmotorik und Trainingswissenschaft vom 28.-30.9.1994 in Leipzig, St Augustin: Academia, 283--286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chollet, D., Madani, N. and Nicallef, J. P. 1992. Effects of two types of biomechanical bio-feedback on crawl performance. In Mac Laren, D., Reilly, T. and Lees, A. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming. Swimming Science VI. Cambridge, 57--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Effenberg, A. O. 2005. Movement Sonification: Effects on Perception and Action. IEEE Multimedia, Special Issue on Interactive Sonification 12(2), 53--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Chiari, L., Dozza, M., Cappello, A., Horak, F. B., Macellari, V. and Giansanti, D. 2005. Audio-Biofeedback for Balance improvements: An Accelerometry-Based System. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag, 52, No. 12, 2108--2111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Godbout, A. and Boyd, J. E. 2010. Corrective sonic feedback for speed skating: a case study. In Proc. of 16 th Int. Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD), Washington, D. C., 23--30, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Warren, W. H. 2006. The dynamics of perception and action. Psych. Rev., 113, 358--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Mattes, K. 2011. Rowing technique. In Altenburg, D., Mattes, K. and Steinacker, J. (Eds.) Coaching High Performance Rowing. Limpert Verlag GmbH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hermann, T. 2008. Taxonomy and Definitions for Sonification and Auditory Display. In Proc. 14 th Int. Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD), June 24--27, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rowing example "Sin-ification": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDBdYG57mc4. retrieved Mai 11th, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Affeld, K., Schichl, K. and Ziemann, A. 1993. Assessment of rowing efficiency. Int J Sports Med; 14 Suppl 1, 39--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. McBride, M. 2005. Rowing Biomechanics. In Nolte, V. (Eds.) Rowing faster. Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc., 111--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nolte, V. 2011. (Ed.) Rowing faster. Serious Training for serious rowers. 2nd edition. Human Kinetics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Böhmert, W. and Mattes, K. 2003. Biomechanische Objektivierung der Ruderbewegung im Rennboot. In Fritsch, W. (Eds.). Rudern - erfahren, erkunden, erforschen. Gießen: Wirth-Verlag (Sport Media), 163--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hermann, T., Höner, O. and Ritter, H. J. 2006. AcouMotion -- An interactive sonification system for acoustic motion control. In Gibet, S., Courty, N. and Kamp, J. F. (Eds.) Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3881, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 312--323. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Vogt, K., Pirro, D., Kobenz, I., Höldrich, R. and Eckel, G. 2009. Physiosonic -- Evaluated Movement Sonification as Auditory Feedback in Physiotherapy. In Ystad, S., Aramaki, M., Kronland-Martinet, R. and Jensen, K. (Eds.): Auditory Display. CMMR/ICAD 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences (LNCS) Vol. 5954. Springer-Verlag Berlin, 103--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lahav, A., Saltzman, E. and Schlaug, G. 2007. Action representation of sound. J. Neuroscience, 27 (2), 308--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Examining effects of acoustic feedback on perception and modification of movement patterns in on-water rowing training

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          AM '11: Proceedings of the 6th Audio Mostly Conference: A Conference on Interaction with Sound
          September 2011
          137 pages
          ISBN:9781450310819
          DOI:10.1145/2095667
          • Conference Chair:
          • Licinio Roque,
          • Program Chair:
          • Valter Alves

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 September 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate177of275submissions,64%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader