skip to main content
10.1145/2107502.2107513acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A market-clearing model for spectrum trade in cognitive radio networks

Published:17 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We model cognitive radio networks (CRNs) as a spectrum market where every primary user (PU) offer her subchannels with certain interference bound indicating the interference limit the PU can tolerate, and secondary users (SUs) purchase the right to access the subchannels while observing their budget constraints as well as the inference bound. In this spectrum market model, the utility of SU is defined as the achievable transmission rate in free space, and the utility of PU is given by the net profit the PU can make. Then we develop a market equilibrium in the context of Fisher model, and show that the equilibrium is obtained by solving an optimization problem called Eisenberg-Gale convex program. Furthermore, we develop a distributed algorithm with best response dynamics and price dynamics, and prove that its asymptotic solutions are equivalent to the solutions given by the convex program. Besides, we introduce adaptive step size to the price dynamics for faster convergence. With some numerical examples, we show that it helps to achieve faster convergence.

References

  1. U. Candogan, I. Menache, A. Ozdaglar, and P. Parrilo. Near-optimal power control in wireless networks: A potential game approach. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1--9, mar. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Codenotti and K. Varadarajan. Computation of market equilibria by convex programming. In N. Nisan, T. Roughgarden, E. Tardos, and V. V. Vazirani, editors, Algorithmic Game Theory, chapter 6, pages 135--158. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Hong and A. Garcia. Competitive sharing of the spectrum in cognitive radio network: A market equilibrium framework. In Proc. Int'l Symp. Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt), pages 40--49, May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. K. Jain, V. V. Vazirani, and Y. Ye. Market equilibria for homothetic, quasi-concave utilities and economies of scale in production. In Proc. ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (SODA), pages 63--71, Jan. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. H. Khalil. Nonlinear Systems. Prentice Hall, 3rd edition, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Li, Y. Xu, J. Liu, X. Wang, and Z. Han. A market game for dynamic multi-band sharing in cognitive radio networks. In Proc. IEEE Int'l. Conf. Communications (ICC), pages 1--5, May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. B. Myerson. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Niyato and E. Hossain. A microeconomic model for hierarchical bandwidth sharing in dynamic spectrum access networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 59(7):865--877, July 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Owen. Game Theory. Emerald, 3rd edition, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Ravindran, D. T. Phillips, and J. J. Solberg. Operations Research: Principles and Practice. Wiley, 2nd edition, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Rice. RF and Microwave Wireless Systems. Wiley, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. C. P. Simon and L. Blume. Mathematics for Economists. Norton, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Wachter and L. T. Biegler. On the implementation of a primal-dual interior point filter line search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programming, 106(1):25--57, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Xie, B. Armbruster, and Y. Ye. Dynamic spectrum management with the competitive market model. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58(4):2442--2446, Apr. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Xing, R. Chandramouli, and C. Cordeiro. Price dynamics in competitive agile spectrum access markets. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 25(3):613--621, Apr. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Xu, X. Liu, and Z. Han. A two-tier market for decentralized dynamic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Sensor Mesh and Ad Hoc Comm. and Networks (SECON), pages 1--9, June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. H. Xu, J. Jin, and B. Li. A secondary market for spectrum. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1--5, Mar. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C.-K. Yu, K.-C. Chen, and S.-M. Cheng. Cognitive radio network tomography. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(4):1980--1997, May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A market-clearing model for spectrum trade in cognitive radio networks

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                MobiHoc '11: Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing
                May 2011
                269 pages
                ISBN:9781450307222
                DOI:10.1145/2107502

                Copyright © 2011 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 17 May 2011

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate296of1,843submissions,16%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader