M. Venkatesh
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
- Benson, P.G., Saraph, J.V., & Schroeder, R.G. (1991). The effects of organizational context on quality management: An empirical investigation. Management Science, 37(9), 1107- 1124. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Crosby, P.B. (I 979). OualiW is free. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
- Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Center for Advanced Engineering.Google Scholar
- DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S., Deshamais, G., & Lewis, H. (1991). Using computing to facilitate the quality improvement process: The IRS-Minnesota project. Interfaces, 21(6), 23-36.Google ScholarDigital Library
- DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S., Lewis, H., & Desharnais, G. (1992). Using computing in quality team meetings: Initial observations from the IRS-Minnesota project. Journal of Management information System__s, 8(3), 7-26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Garvin, D.A. (1991, November/December). How the Baldrige Award really works. Harvard_Business Review, 80-95.Google Scholar
- Gladstein, D.L. (1984). Groups m context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Ouarterly, 29, 499-517.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Greenbaum, H.H., Kaplan, I.T., & Metlay, W. (1988). Evaluation of problem-solving groups: The case of Quality circle programs. Group & Organization Studies, 13(2), 133-147.Google Scholar
- Hackman, J.R. (1990). Work teams in organizations: An orienting framework. In Groups that work (and those that dofft): Creatin~ conditions for effective teamwork, J.R. Hackman (Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Hackman, J.R., & Walton, R.E. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In P.S. Goodman (Ed.), Desimfine effective work ogLg__g.~. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Juran, J.M. (1974). Ouatitv control handbook (3rd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Kotodny, H., and Kiggundu, M. (1980). Towards the development of a sociotechnical systems model in Woodlands mechanical harvesting. Human Relati%ns, 33, 623-645.Google Scholar
- McGrath, J.E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York, NY: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
- Nieva, V.F., Fleishman, E.A., and Rieck, A. (1978). Team dimensions: Their identity ... Their measurement, and their relationships (Contract No. DAHC 19-78-C-0001). Washington, D.C.' Advanced Research Resources Organization.Google Scholar
- Shea, G.P., and Guzzo, R.A. (1984). A theory of work ~oup effectiveness. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group.process and productivi~. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Sundstrom. E., De Meuse, K.P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45(2), 120-133.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wood, R., Hull, F., and Azumi, K. (1983). Evaluating quality circles: The American application. California Management Revie__~_w, 25 (1), 37-53.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Work group effectiveness models and quality improvement teams
Recommendations
Measuring and Comparing Effectiveness of Data Quality Techniques
CAiSE '09: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Systems EngineeringPoor quality data may be detected and corrected by performing various quality assurance activities that rely on techniques with different efficacy and cost. In this paper, we propose a quantitative approach for measuring and comparing the effectiveness ...
Lean quality improvement model for quality practices in software industry in Pakistan
Implementation of quality and achieving quality culture in small and medium software houses SMSH have been a subject of discussion among the industry. The existing software process improvement frameworks are too heavy for SMSH. There is a need of lean ...
Comments