skip to main content
10.1145/2141512.2141591acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Rationale flower: a visualization tool for identifying hidden profiles in instant messaging

Published:11 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Known as hidden profiles problem in group decision-making, a group tends to retrieve and discuss information that are known to majority of the group members and omit or neglect unique information to individuals which leads to the correct solution. Prior studies have shown that validity of the unique information is one key factor of the hidden profiles problem. In an attempt to address hidden profiles problem in computer-mediated communication, this paper presents a work-in-progress tool, Rationale Flower that visualizes the rationales exchanged through instant messaging in an online group decision making activity. In this study, a rationale is a member's explanation of why a piece of information should be brought to the group discussion. By this definition, it is expected that visualizing the members' rationales will not only attract group members' attentions to them but also support the group to testify and validate the unique information.

References

  1. Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think. MIS Quarterly, 20, 433--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Introne, J. E. (2009). Supporting group decisions by mediating deliberation to improve information pooling. In Proc. of the ACM 2009 Int. Conf. on Supporting Group Work (May 10 - 13, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA), 189--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kerr, D. S., Murthy, U. S. (2009). The effectiveness of synchronous computer-mediated communication for solving hidden-profile problems: Further empirical evidence, Information & Management, 46, 83--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. J. of Personality and Social Psychology. 80, 918--930.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467--1478Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. D. (2000). Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among members, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 102--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Xiao, L. A Shared Rationale Space for Supporting Knowledge Awareness in Collaborative Learning Activities: An Empirical Study, Proc. of 11th IEEE Int. Conf. on Adv. Learn. Tech., (July 6 - 8, 2011, Athens, GA). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Rationale flower: a visualization tool for identifying hidden profiles in instant messaging

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion
        February 2012
        388 pages
        ISBN:9781450310512
        DOI:10.1145/2141512

        Copyright © 2012 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 February 2012

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CSCW '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader