skip to main content
10.1145/2145204.2145223acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adapting collaborative radiological practice to low-resource environments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe how current radiological best practices are predicated on a sophisticated technological ecosystem usually comprised of multiple large-scale displays, and integrated record keeping and communication systems driven by high-speed networks. At the same time, current development of low-cost ultrasound (U/S) devices for low-resource settings trends towards small-scale, independent devices with palm-sized screens. We reviewed existing literature, analyzed findings from two years of fieldwork in Uganda, and conducted an interview study with clinicians about radiology work practices to determine which patterns and technologies contribute to the efficacy of ultrasound. We use these findings to inform how ultrasound technology in low-resource settings can most usefully be developed and deployed. In addition, findings are relevant for creating medical technologies for low-resource environments generally, as we make clear the importance of considering not just technology development aspects like power consumption and interface, but also larger technology and work ecosystems.

References

  1. Anderson, R. E. et al., "Building a Transportation Information System Using Only GPS and Basic SMS Infrastructure," ICTD 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Anokwa, Y. et al (December 01, 2009). Stories from the Field: Reflections on HCI4D Experiences. Information Technologies & International Development, 5, 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardram, J. and Doryab, A. 2011. Activity analysis: applying activity theory to analyze complex work in hospitals. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '11). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Breslauer, D., et al 2009. "Mobile Phone Based Clinical Microscopy for Global Health Applications". PLoS ONE. 4 (7).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunette, W., Gerard, W., Hicks, M., Hope, A., et. al. 2010. Portable antenatal ultrasound platform for village midwives. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Symposium on Computing for Development (London, United Kingdom, December 17-18, 2010). ACM DEV '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011, June). Occupational Outlook Handbook. Diagnostic Medical Sonographers {Online}. Available: www.bls.gov/oco/ocos273.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Donner, J., et al (June 01, 2008). Stages of Design in Technology for Global Development. Computer, 41, 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dourish, P. & Bellotti, V. 1992. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW '92). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dourish, P. 2006. Re-space-ing place: "place" and "space" ten years on. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '06). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fridell, K., et al. "The Impact of PACS on Radiologists' Work Practice," Journal of Digital Imaging, Volume 20, No 4 (December), 2007: pp 411--421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gandhi, R., et al "Digital Green: Participatory Video for Agricultural Extension," ICTD 2007, pp.21--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Heeks, R. (June 01, 2008). ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development. Computer, 41, 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Herrera, A. (January 01, 1981). The generation of technologies in rural areas. World Development, 9, 1, 21--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jordan, B. (1978). Birth in four cultures: A crosscultural investigation of childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden, and the United States. Montreal: Eden Press Women's Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Karasti, K., et al "The Teleradiology System and Changes in Work Practices," Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 57 (1998) 69--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Korpela, M., et al (August 01, 1998). Community Participation in Health Informatics in Africa: An Experiment in Tripartite Partnership in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: the Journal of Collaborative Computing, 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Larson, E., et al (2011). Accurate and Privacy Preserving Cough Sensing using Low-cost Microphone. To appear at the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2011), Beijing, China, Sep 17-21, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Leach, J., et al (January 01, 2004). Deep impact: a study of the use of hand-held computers for teacher professional development in primary schools in the Global South 1. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 1, 5--28Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Le Dantec, C. and Edwards, W. 2008. The view from the trenches: organization, power, and technology at two nonprofit homeless outreach centers. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '08). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Malkin, R. A. (August 01, 2007). Design of Health Care Technologies for the Developing World. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 9, 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. MEDCON. (2011, June). {Online}. Available: http://uwmedicine.washington.edu/patient-care/referrals/pages/medcon.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. MD Consult. (2011, June). {Online}. Available: www.mdconsult.com/php/255837386-2/homepageGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Olson, G. & Olson, J., 2000. Distance matters. Human Comput. Interact. 15, 2 (September 2000), 139--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Parikh, T., et al "Mobile phones and paper documents: evaluating a new approach for capturing microfinance data in rural India," CHI 2006, pp. 551--560. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Paul, S. A., and Reddy, M. (2010). Understanding Together: Sensemaking in Collaborative Information Seeking. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pinch, T. and Bijker, W. The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, (1984), 399--441.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Putnam, C., Rose, E.,Walton, R. & Kolko, B. Mobile phone users in Kyrgyzstan: A case study of identifying user requirements for diverse users In Proceedings of IPCC 2009, Honolulu, Hawaii, July 20-23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Reddy, M., & Jansen, B. (2008) A Model for Understanding Collaborative Information Behavior in Context: A Study of Two Healthcare Teams. Information Processing and Management. 44(1): 256--273. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Schmidt, K., and Bannon, L. 'Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work', Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, vol. 1, 1992, no. 1-2, pp. 7--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Tellioglu, H., & Wagner, I. (May 01, 2001). Work Practices Surrounding PACS: The Politics of Space in Hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: the Journal of Collaborative Computing, 10, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. UpToDate. (2011, June). {Online}. Available: www.uptodate.com/contents/searchGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Veeraraghavan, R., et al (March 01, 2009). Warana Unwired: Replacing PCs with Mobile Phones in a Rural Sugarcane Cooperative. Information Technologies & International Development, 5, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wagner, I. and Tellioglu, H. 2011. The multidisciplinary design group in Vienna. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '11). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Yager, P., et al (July 27, 2006). Microfluidic diagnostic technologies for global public health. Nature, 442, 7101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Yakel, E., et al "Medicine in the Dark: Obtaining Design Requirements for a Medical Collaboratory from Observation of Radiologists at Work," CSCW (Computer Supported Cooperative Work) 96: Boston: November 16-20, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Adapting collaborative radiological practice to low-resource environments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
      February 2012
      1460 pages
      ISBN:9781450310864
      DOI:10.1145/2145204

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 February 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '12 Paper Acceptance Rate164of415submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader