Dana Rotman
Derek Hansen
ABSTRACT
Online citizen science projects engage volunteers in collecting, analyzing, and curating scientific data. Existing projects have demonstrated the value of using volunteers to collect data, but few projects have reached the full collaborative potential of scientists and volunteers. Understanding the shared and unique motivations of these two groups can help designers establish the technical and social infrastructures needed to promote effective partnerships. We present findings from a study of the motivational factors affecting participation in ecological citizen science projects. We show that volunteers are motivated by a complex framework of factors that dynamically change throughout their cycle of work on scientific projects; this motivational framework is strongly affected by personal interests as well as external factors such as attribution and acknowledgment. Identifying the pivotal points of motivational shift and addressing them in the design of citizen-science systems will facilitate improved collaboration between scientists and volunteers.
- Irwin, A. Citizen science: a study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. Burns & Oates, 1995.Google Scholar
- Stewart, P. A. The value of the Christmas bird counts. The Wilson Bulletin, 66, 3 (1954), 184--195.Google Scholar
- Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J. and Wilderman, C. C. Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education - a CAISE Inquiry Group Report., Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education, Washington, DC, 2009.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, B. L., Wood, C. L., Iliff, M. J., Bonney, R. E., Fink, D. and Kelling, S. eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation, 142, 10 (2009), 2282--2292.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kim, S., Robson, C., Zimmerman, T., Pierce, J. and Haber, E. M. Creek watch: pairing usefulness and usability for successful citizen science. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 2125--2134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., Lintott, C. J., Murray, P., Schawinski, K., Szalay, A. S. and Vandenberg, J. Galaxy zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Rev., 9 (2010), 010103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cranshaw, J. and Kittur, A. The polymath project: lessons from a successful online collaboration in mathematics. In Proc. CHI 2011. ACM Press (2011), 1865--1874. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton Univ Press, 1979.Google Scholar
- Bozeman, B. and Corley, E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33, 4 (2004), 599--616.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S. L. and Sonnenwald, D. H. An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 10 (2003), 952--965. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van House, N. A. Digital libraries and practices of trust: networked biodiversity information. Social Epistemology, 16, 1 (2002), 99--114.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Van House, N. A. Trust and epistemic communities in biodiversity data sharing. JCDL' 02. ACM Press (2002), 231--239. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ellis, R. and Waterton, C. Environmental citizenship in the making: the participation of volunteer naturalists in UK biological recording and biodiversity policy. Science and public policy, 31, 2 (2004), 95--105.Google Scholar
- Wiggins, A. and Crowston, K. Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. In Proc. HICSS'44. IEEE (2011), 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Olson, J., Yew, J., Yerkie, J., Dahl, E. and Olson, G. From shared databases to communities of practice: A taxonomy of collaboratories. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12, 2 (2007), 652--672.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wenger, E. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge Univ Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Preece, J. and Shneiderman, B. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 1 (2009), 5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Forte, A. and Bruckman, A. Why do people write for wikipedia? Incentives to contribute to open content publishing. In Proc. of GROUP' 05 (2005), 6--9.Google Scholar
- Nov, O., Anderson, D. and Arazy, O. Volunteer computing: a model of the factors determining contribution to community-based scientific research. In Proc. WWW 2010. ACM Press (2010), 741--750. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Kiesler, S., Terveen, L. and Riedl, J. How oversight improves member-maintained communities. In Proc. CHI 2005. ACM Press (2005) 11--20. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kriplean, T., Beschastnikh, I. and McDonald, D. W. Articulations of wikiwork: uncovering valued work in wikipedia through barnstars. In Proc. CSCW 2008. ACM Press (2008), 47--56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benkler, Y. Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and "The Nature of the Firm". The Yale Law Journal, 112, 3 (2002), 369--446.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N. and Tsang, J. A. Four motives for community involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 3 (2002), 429--445.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. M. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc, 1997.Google Scholar
- Cohn, J. P. Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58, 3 (2008), 192--197.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Crane, D. Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the" invisible college" hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 34, 3 (1969), 335--352.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects
Recommendations
Dusting for science: motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers
iConference '11: Proceedings of the 2011 iConferenceDigital citizen science offers a low-cost way to strengthen the scientific infrastructure, and engage members of the public in science. It is based on two pillars:(1)a technological pillar, which involves developing computer systems to manage large ...
Do games attract or sustain engagement in citizen science?: a study of volunteer motivations
CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIncreasingly, games are being incorporated into online citizen science (CS) projects as a way of crowdsourcing data; yet the influence of gamification on volunteer motivations and engagement in CS projects is still unknown. In an interview study with 8 ...
Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn most online citizen science projects, a large proportion of participants contribute in small quantities. To investigate how low contributors differ from committed volunteers, we distributed a survey to members of the Old Weather project, followed by ...
Comments