skip to main content
10.1145/2147805.2147883acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Constraint graphs as security filters for privacy assurance in medical transactions

Published:01 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We model transactions as exchange of graphs and propose constraint graphs as transaction filters for attribute-based transformations in clinical settings. An informal representation and working of constraint graphs is presented. A workbench was developed using a real world EMR system to demonstrate the concept. Results of our experiments using constraint graphs are consistent with published benchmark results.

References

  1. Mathew, G and Obradovic, Z. 2011. A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Distributed Clinical Decision Support. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Computational Advances in Bio and medical Sciences. Feb 2011, Orlando, FL. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCABS.2011.5729866 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aggarwal, C. C., and Wang, H. 2010. Managing and Mining Graph Data. Springer, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dwork, C. 2006. Differential Privacy. In Proceedings of 33rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, July, 2006. Venice, Italy, pp. 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. McSherry, F. D. 2009. Privacy integrated queries: an extensible platform for privacy-preserving data analysis. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Providence, RI. pp. 19--30. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1559845.1559850. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. He, H., and Singh, A. K. 2008. Graphs-at-a-time: Query Language and Access Methods for Graph Databases. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. Vancouver, Canada. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1376616.1376660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Home page for Open EMR software, 2010. http://www.oemr.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. SPECT Heart Data Set: Available at -- http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/SPECT+HeartGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Constraint graphs as security filters for privacy assurance in medical transactions

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            BCB '11: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine
            August 2011
            688 pages
            ISBN:9781450307963
            DOI:10.1145/2147805
            • General Chairs:
            • Robert Grossman,
            • Andrey Rzhetsky,
            • Program Chairs:
            • Sun Kim,
            • Wei Wang

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 August 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • poster

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate254of885submissions,29%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader