Cindy Grimm
- App85.Apple Computer, Inc. Inside Macintosh. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1985.]] Google Scholar
Digital Library
- BR91.Mark Bloomenthal and Richard Riesenfeld. Approximation of sweep surfaces by tensor product NURBS. In Proceedings of SPIE Conference, volume 1610, pages 132-144, November 1991.]]Google Scholar
- CLR80.Elaine Cohen, Tom Lyche, and Richard Riesenfeld. Discrete b-splines and subdivision techniques in computer-aided geometric design and computer graphics. Comput. Gr. Image Process., 14:87-111, October 1980.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cob84.Elizabeth Susan Cobb. Design of Sculptured Surfaces Using the B-spline Representation. PhD thesis, University of Utah, Department of Computer Science, 1984.]]Google Scholar
- CSH+93.D. Brookshire Conner, S. S. Snibbe, K. P. Hemdon, D.C. Robbins, R. Zeleznik, and A. van Dam. Thre~-dimensional widgets. In Proceedings of the 1993 ACM Workshop on Interactive Graphics, 1993.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- EGS91.Utah Engineering Geometry Systems, Salt Lake City. Alpha__l User's Manual. 1991.]]Google Scholar
- Elb92.Gershon Elber. Free Form Surface Analysis using a hybrid ofsymbollic and numeric computation. PhD thesis, University of Utah, Department of Computer Science, 1992.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Far92.Gerald Farin. Curves and Surfaces for Computer Aided Geometric Design. Academic Press, third edition, 1992.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- FB91.Barry M. Fowler and Richard H. Bartels. Constraint based curve manipulation. Course Notes 25, Siggraph '91, July 1991. Las Vegas.]]Google Scholar
- Fil89.Daniel J. Fillip. Blending parametric surfaces. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 8(3):164-173, July 1989.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fow92.Barry Fowler. Geometric manipulation of tensor product surfaces. Computer Graphics (1992 Symposium on Interactive 31) Graphics), 25(2): 101-108, March 1992.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- HHK92.William Hsu, J. F. Hughes, and H. Kaufman. Direct manipulation of free-form deformations. Computer Graphics, 26(2): 117-184, July 1992. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '92.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim92.Kwansik Kim. Blending parametric surfaces. Master's thesis, University of Utah, Department of Computer Science, 1992.]]Google Scholar
- SHR+92.Scott S. Snibbe, Kenneth P. Hemdon, Daniel C. Robbins, D. Brookshire Conner, and Andries van Dam. Using deformations to explore 3D widget design. Computer Graphics, 26(2):351-352, July 1992. Video paper.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- SZH94.M. Stevens, R. Zeleznik, and J. F. Hughes. An architecture for an extensible 3d interface toolkit. In Proceedings of the 1994 UIST, September 1994.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- TPBF87.D. Terzopoulos, J. Platt, A. Barr, and K. Fleischef. Elastic deformable models. Computer Graphics, 21(4), July 1987. Proceexlings of SIG- GRAPH '87.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- WW92.William Welch and Andrew Witlon. Variational surface modeling. Computer Graphics, 22(2):157-166, July 1992. Proceedings of SIG- GRAPH '92.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- ZCv+91.Robert C. Zeleznik, D. Brookshire Connor, Andries van Dam, Matthias M. Wloka, Daniel G. Aliaga. Nathan T. Huang, Philip M. Hubbard, Brian Knep, Henry E. Kaufman, and John F. Hughes. An obJect-oriented framework for the integration of interactive animation techniques. Computer Graphics, 21(2), July 1991.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- ZHR+93.Robert C. Zeleznik, Kenneth P. Herndon, Daniel C. Robbins, Nate Huang, Tom Meyer, Noah Parker, and John F. Hughes. A toolkit for interactive construction of 3D interfaces. Computer Graphics, 27(4):81-84,1993. Video Paper.]]Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Visual interfaces for solids modeling
Recommendations
From usability tasks to usable user interfaces
TAMODIA '05: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Task models and diagramsIn this paper we describe how the identification of usability tasks in the task model as an early consideration of usability in the process can directly influence the design of usable User Interfaces (UI). We intend to make system analysts and UI ...
Hard-to-use interfaces considered beneficial (some of the time)
CHI EA '10: CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsResearchers in HCI share a common understanding that 'easy-to-use', 'easy-to-learn' and 'intuitive' interfaces are beneficial to users. Designing such interfaces raises challenges and often requires multiple iterations. While we are generally prompt to ...
Defining Interfaces at a High Level of Abstraction
One of the newest user-interface management systems, the User-Interface Development Environment, is described by its creators. UIDE is built around a knowledge-based representation of the conceptual design of a user interface. UIDE supports design at a ...
Comments