skip to main content
10.1145/2157689.2157698acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

New measurement of psychological safety for humanoid

Published:05 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this article, we aim to discover the important factors for determining the psychological safety of humanoids and to develop a new psychological scale to measure the degree of safety quantitatively. To discover the factors that determine the psychological safety of humanoids from an ordinary person's perspective, we studied 919 Japanese, who observed movies of 11 humanoids and then freely described their impressions about what the safety of each humanoid was for them. Five psychologists categorized all of the obtained descriptions into several categories and then used the categories to compose a new psychological scale. Then, 2,624 different Japanese evaluated the same 11 humanoids using the new scale. Factor analysis on the obtained quantitative data revealed six factors of psychological safety: Performance, Humanness, Acceptance, Harmlessness, Toughness, and Agency. Additional analysis revealed that Performance, Acceptance, Harmlessness, and Toughness were the most important factors for determining the psychological safety of general humanoids. The usability of the new scale is discussed.

References

  1. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research DOI= http://www.ipss.go.jp/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, "Guidelines for Next-generation Robot Safety" DOI= http://www.meti.go.jp/english/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare DOI= http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Lohse, F. Hegel, B. Wrede (2008) Domestic Applications for social robots - a user study on appearance and function. Journal of Physical Agents 2: 21--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K. Inoue, Y. Ujiie, T. Takubo, and T. Arai: "Psychological Evaluatioin for Rough Shape of Humanoid Robots Using Virtual Reality", The 13th International Conference on Adavanced Robotics (ICAR 2007), pp. 1005--1010, August 21-24, 2007, Jeju, Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Negi, T. Arai, K. Inoue, Y. Ujiie, T. Takubo (2008) Psychological Assessment of humanoid Robot Appearance and Performance Using Virtual Reality. in Proc. of 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive 719--724.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Y. Ujiie, K. Inoue, T. Takubo, T. Arai (2006) Evaluation of human sense of security for coexisting robots using virtual reality. in Proc. of 3rd International Symposium on Systems and Human Science (SSR 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. Inoue, S. Nonaka, Y. Ujiie, T. Takubo and T. Arai "Comparison of Human Psychology for Real and Virtual Mobile Manipulators", Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005), pp. 73--78, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, August 13-15, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Y. Muto, S. Takasugi, T. Yamamoto, Y. Miyake (2009) Timing Control of Utterance and Gesture in Interaction between Human and Humanoid robot. in Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.1022--1028.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, M. Imai, T. Ono (2004) Development and Evaluation of Interactive Humanoid Robots. in Proc. of the IEEE (Special issue on Human Interactive Robot for Psychological Enrichment) 92:1839--1850.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H. Kamide, M. Yasumoto, Y. Mae, T. Takubo, T. K. Ohara, and T. Arai "Comparative Evaluation of Virtual and Real Humanoid with Robot-Oriented Psychology Scale" 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Shanghai International Conference Center, pp. 599--604, May 9-13, Shanghai, China, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. http://www.jara.jp/publication/dl/servicerobot_system2.pdf (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. Bartneck, D. Kulic., E. Croft, and S. Zoghbi (2009). "Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots." International Journal of Social Robots 1(1): 71--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro and T. Ishida, Psychological analysis on human-robot interaction, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2001), pp. 4166--4173, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. H. Kamide, Y. Mae, T. Takubo, K. Ohara, and T. Arai, "Development of a Scale of Perception to Humanoid Robots: PERNOD", in Proc. of The 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Taipei, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. S. Koizumi, T. Kanda, M. Shiomi, H. Ishiguro, N. Hagita, Preliminary Field Trial for Teleoperated Communication Robots IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (ROMAN2006), 2006. (Sep. 6-8, Hatfield, United Kingdom).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. N. Kawachi, Y. Koyuu, K. Nagashima, K. Ohnishi, R. Hiura, Home-use Robot "wakamaru,". Mitsubishi Juko Giho, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 270--273. (2003) (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. http://www.frontech.fujitsu.com/services/products/robot/serv icerobot/ (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Shigemi, Y. Kawaguchi, T. Yoshiike, K. Kawabe, and N. Okgawa, " Development of New ASIMO", Honda Technical Review Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 38--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. F. Kaneko, S. Kanehiro, H. Kajita, T. Hirukawa, M. Kawasaki, K. Hirata, K. Akachi and T. Isozumi, "Humanoid Robot HRP-2", in Proc. of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, New Orleans, 2004, pp. 1083--1090.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. K. Kaneko, F. Kanehiro, M. Morisawa, K. Miura, S. Nakaoka, and S. Kajita, "Cybernetic Human HRP-4C," Proc. IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 7--14, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Nakaoka, F. Kanehiro, K. Miura, M. Morisawa, K. Fujiwara, K. Kaneko, S. Kajita, and H. Hirukawa, "Creating facial motions of Cybernetic Human HRP-4C," in IEEE RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Paris, France, December 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. T. Minato, F. DallaLibera, S. Yokokawa, Y. Nakamura, H. Ishiguro, Emanuele Menegatti, A baby robot platform for developmental robotics, Proc. of the Workshop on Synergistic Intelligence: Approach to Human Intelligence through Understanding and Design of Cognitive Development (IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. T. Minato, Y. Yoshikawa, T. Noda, S. Ikemoto, H. Ishiguro, and M. Asada, CB2: a child robot with biomimetic body for cognitive developmental robotics, Proc. of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 557--562, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Chikaraishi, T., Minato, T., Ishiguro, H., "Development of an Android System Integrated with Sensor Networks", the Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2008), pp. 326--333, September, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ogawa, K., Bartneck, C., Sakamoto, D., Kanda, T., Ono, T., Ishiguro, H. Can An Android Persuade You?, The 18th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN2009), pp. 553--557, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. http://www.kokoro-dreams.co.jp/actroid_f/index.html (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. New measurement of psychological safety for humanoid

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '12: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2012
      518 pages
      ISBN:9781450310635
      DOI:10.1145/2157689

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 March 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader