ABSTRACT
The state-of-the-art in software engineering for game engines, recommends the use of a component-based software architecture for managing the entities in a game. A component-based architecture facilitates the definition of new types of entities as collections of components that provide basic pieces of functionality, providing a flexible software that can adapt to changes in game design. However, such flexibility comes with a price, both in terms of software understanding and error checking: a game where entity types are just run-time concepts is harder to understand than one with an explicit hierarchy of entity types; and error checking that, in a more traditional inheritance-based architecture, would come from type safety at compile time is now lost. To alleviate these problems, a component-based architecture employs blueprints, external data files that specify the particular combination of components for every entity type.
In this paper we propose an extension to the component-based architecture, substituting blueprints with a full fledged domain model in OWL, including a description of the entities, its attributes and components, along with the messages they exchange. We also describe authoring tools for building such a model and show how the model improves software understanding and error checking.
- F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Bilas. A data-driven game object system. In Game Developer Conference, 2002.Google Scholar
- M. Chady. Theory and practice of game object component architecture. In Game Developers Conference, 2009.Google Scholar
- G. M. Y. Frederick W. P. Heckel and D. H. Hale. Influence points for tactical information in navigation meshes. In international Conference on Foundations of Digital Games(FDG), 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. M. Y. Frederick W. P. Heckel and D. H. Hale. Rapid development of intelligent agents in first/third-person training simulations via behavior-based control. In Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation Conference (BRIMS), 2010.Google Scholar
- E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. E. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison Wesley Professional, Massachusetts, USA, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Llansó, M. A. Gómez-Martín, and P. A. González-Calero. Self-validated behaviour trees through reflective components. In Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE), Stanford, California, USA, 2009. AAAI Press.Google Scholar
- B. Parsia and E. Sirin. Pellet: An owl dl reasoner. In In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics, page 2003, 2004.Google Scholar
- E. B. Passos, J. W. S. Sousa, E. W. G. Clua, A. Montenegro, and R. L. Murta. Smart composition of game objects using dependency injection. ACM Computer in Entertainment, 7(4), 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. Pastor and J. C. Molina. Model-Driven Architecture in Practice. A Software Production Environment Based on Conceptual Modeling. Springer Verlag, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Rene. Game Programming Gems 5, chapter Component Based Object Management. Charles River Media, 2005.Google Scholar
- S. Seedorf, F. F. Informatik, and U. Mannheim. Applications of ontologies in software engineering. In In 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Web Enabled Software Engineering (SWESE 2006), held at the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2006).Google Scholar
- T. Sweeney. The next mainstream programming language: a game developer's perspective. In Conference record of the 33rd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages (POPL'06), page 269, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- U. Technologies. Unity, 2011. http://unity3d.com/.Google Scholar
- P. Tetlow, J. Pan, D. Oberle, E. Wallace, M. Uschold, and E. Kendall. Ontology driven architectures and potential uses of the semantic web in software engineering. W3C, Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment Working Group, Draft (2006).Google Scholar
- M. West. Evolve your hiearchy. Game Developer, 13(3):51--54, Mar. 2006.Google Scholar
- G. M. Youngblood, F. W. Heckel, D. H. Hale, and P. N. Dixit. Artificial Intelligence for Computer Games, chapter Embedding Information into Game Worlds to Improve Interactive Intelligence, pages 31--54. Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
- X. Zhu and Z. Jin. Ontology-based inconsistency management of software requirements specifications. In P. Vojtas, M. Bieliková, B. Charron-Bost, and O. Sýkora, editors, SOFSEM 2005: Theory and Practice of Computer Science, volume 3381 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 340--349. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2005. 10.1007/978-3-540-30577-4_37. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Serious Video Games: Games for Education and Health
ITNG '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Ninth International Conference on Information Technology - New GenerationsEvery game in the market is made in an effort to play, produce, teach, motivate, socialize, communicate and educate different cultures. The gamer is exposed to different types of games that can be categorized into a casual game, serious game and ...
The interplay between immersion and appeal in video games
A 2í 2 study on immersion and appeal of video games is presented.Immersion and appeal are found to be highly related.Immersion is found to be unaffected by playing experience.Appeal is found to be affected both by game played and playing experience. ...
Comments