skip to main content
10.1145/2160749.2160773acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multiprogram control for dynamic systems: a point of view

Published:08 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we analyze potentials and describe methods of synthesis of so-called multiprogram controls in different classes of dynamic systems. The main idea is to construct the control that provides predesigned finite set of asymptotically stable program motions for closed-loop system. Special attention is paid to modification of algorithms to extend possibilities of its application. For this aim, firstly, special classes of multiprogram controls are involved. Hybrid controls have continuous elements to realize program motions, and discrete stabilizers. Secondly, we analyze a case of incomplete feedback when some components of the phase state vector cannot be measured. In this case, the multiprogram control system is supplemented with asymptotic observer (state estimator), which also could be hybrid. Practically, the system closed with a multiprogram control is a nonlinear program automate that can realize any program motion of predesigned class depending on initial values. Developed theoretical base allows constructing of multiprogram control systems in cases of both complete and incomplete feedback when information in feedback channels is discrete. Research results are illustrated with an example of real technical application. The multiprogram control problem for providing of several modes of flywheel work in a car engine is considered.

References

  1. Y. N. Andreev. Control for n-dimensional linear objects. Nauka, Moscow, 1976 (in Russian).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. I. V. Burkov and A. T. Zaremba. Adaptive control for angle speed oscillations generated by periodic disturbances. In Proceedings of the sixth St. Petersburg Symposium on Adaptive Systems Theory dedicated to the memory of Ya.Z. Tsypkin, pages 34--36, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. J. Krener. Bilinear and nonlinear realizations of input-output maps. SIAM J. Control, 13(4):827--834, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. G. Luenberger. An introduction to observers. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, AC--16(6):596--602, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. R. R. Mohler. Natural bilinear control process. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 15(3):192--197, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. R. Mohler. Bilinear Control Process. Academic Press, New York, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. R. Mohler and A. Ruberti. Recent Developments in Variable Structure Systems, Economics, and Biology. Springer, New York, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y. Shakhov. Multiprogram stabilization of equilibrium positions for a nonlinear dynamic system. In Proceedings of the 14-th International Conference on Humans and Computers, page in this book, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. V. Smirnov. Synthesis of asymptotic observers in the problem of multiprogram stabilization of bilinear systems. Mathematical Notes, 72(4):535--546, 2002 (in Russian).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. V. Smirnov and Y. A. Shakhov. Multiprogram stabilization of quasi-linear systems. Vestnik St. Petersburg University, Ser. 10 Control Processes, (4):128--138, 2010 (in Russian).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. N. V. Smirnov and T. E. Smirnova. Stabilization of program motions family of the bilinear nonstationary system. Vestnik St. Petersburg University, Ser. 1 Mathematics, 2(8):70--75, 1998 (in Russian).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. N. V. Smirnov and T. E. Smirnova. Synthesis of multiprogram control for bilinear systems. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 64(6):929--932, 2000 (in Russian).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. N. V. Smirnov and I. V. Solovyeva. Application of a closed-loop optimization method for multiprogram stabilization of bilinear systems. Vestnik St. Petersburg University, Ser. 10 Control Processes, (3):251--259, 2009 (in Russian).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Solis-Daun, R. Suarez, and J. Alvarez-Ramirez. Global stabilization of nonlinear systems with inputs subject to magnitude and rate bounds: a parametric optimization approach. SIAM J. Control Optim., 39(3):682--706, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. I. Solovyeva. Positional optimization in a certain problem of multiprogrammed control. In Proceedings of the 11-th International Conference on Humans and Computers, pages 359--393, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Svoronos, G. Stephanopoulos, and R. Aris. Bilinear approximation of general non-linear dynamic systems with linear inputs. Int. J. Control, 31(1):109--126, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. V. I. Zubov. Synthesis of multiprogram stable controls. Reports Academy of Sciences USSR, 318(2):274--277, 1991 (in Russian).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multiprogram control for dynamic systems: a point of view

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      HCCE '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint International Conference on Human-Centered Computer Environments
      March 2012
      277 pages
      ISBN:9781450311915
      DOI:10.1145/2160749

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 March 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      HCCE '12 Paper Acceptance Rate48of81submissions,59%Overall Acceptance Rate48of81submissions,59%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader