skip to main content
research-article

Semantic interoperability in standardized electronic health record databases

Published: 07 May 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Different clinics and hospitals have their own information systems to maintain patient data. This hinders the exchange of data among systems (and organizations). Hence there is a need to provide standards for data exchange. In digitized form, the individual patient's medical record can be stored, retrieved, and shared over a network through enhancement in information technology. Thus, electronic health records (EHRs) should be standardized, incorporating semantic interoperability. A subsequent step requires that healthcare professionals and patients get involved in using the EHRs, with the help of technological developments. This study aims to provide different approaches in understanding some current and challenging concepts in health informatics. Successful handling of these challenges will lead to improved quality in healthcare by reducing medical errors, decreasing costs, and enhancing patient care. The study is focused on the following goals: (1) understanding the role of EHRs; (2) understanding the need for standardization to improve quality; (3) establishing interoperability in maintaining EHRs; (4) examining a framework for standardization and interoperability (the openEHR architecture; (5) identifying the role of archetypes for knowledge-based systems; and (6) understanding the difficulties in querying HER data.

References

[1]
AQB 2009. Archetype query builder. http://www.oceaninformatics.com/Solutions/ocean-products/Clinical-Modelling/Ocean-Query-Builder.html. (Accessed 12/09).
[2]
AQL 2009. Archetype query language. http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/spec/Archetype+Query+ Language+Description. (Accessed 12/09).
[3]
Archetype editor tool. 2009. http://wiki.oceaninformatics.com/confluence/display/TTL/Archetype+Editor+ Releases. (Accessed 12/09).
[4]
Atalag, K., Kingsford, D., Paton, C., and Warren, J. 2010. Putting health record interoperability standards to work. J. Health Inf. 5, 1 (e-jhi).
[5]
Batini, C. and Scannapieco, M. 2006. Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies, and Techniques. Springer, Berlin.
[6]
Beale, T. 2008. The openEHR archetype model: Archetype object model. In the openEHR release 1.0.2, openEHR Foundation.
[7]
Beale, T. 2010. OpenEHR to ISO 13606-1, ISO 21090 mapping. http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/stds/openEHR+to+ISO+13606-1%2C+ISO+21090+mapping.
[8]
Beale, T. and Frankel, H. 2007. The openEHR reference model: Extract information model. The openEHR release 1, openEHR Foundation.
[9]
Beale, T. and Heard, S. 2005. Archetype definitions and principles. In the openEHR release 1.0.2, openEHR Foundation.
[10]
Beale, T. and Heard, S. 2008a. The openEHR architecture: Architecture overview. In the openEHR release 1.0.2, openEHR Foundation.
[11]
Beale, T., and Heard, S. 2008b. The openEHR archetype model-archetype definition language ADL 1.4. In openEHR release 1.0.2 (issue date: 12/08).
[12]
Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Llyod, D. 2008. The openEHR reference model: EHR information model. In the openEHR release 1.0.2., openEHR Foundation.
[13]
Beale, T. and Heard, S. 2009. The openEHR archetype model: openEHR Templates. In openEHR release 1.0.2. (issue date 4/20/09).
[14]
Bhalla, S. and Hasegawa, M. 2006. Query interface for ubiquitous access to database resources. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Management of Data (COMAD).
[15]
Bisbal, J. and Berry, D. 2009. Archetype alignment: A two-level driven semantic matching approach to interoperability in the clinical domain. In HEALTHINFO, 216--221.
[16]
Blobel, B. G. M. E. and Pharow, P. 2008. Analysis and evaluation of EHR approaches. In eHealth Beyond the Horizon: Get It There (MIE'08).
[17]
Bott, O. J. 2004. The electronic health record: Standardization and implementation. In Proceedings of the 2nd OpenECG Workshop.
[18]
Braga, D., Campi, A., and Ceri, S. 2005. XQBE (XQueryBy example): A visual interface to the standard XML query language. ACM Trans. Datab. Syst. 30, 2, 398--443.
[19]
CEN TC/251. European standardization of health informatics. ENV 13606 Electronic Health Record Communication. http://www.centc251.org/.
[20]
Ceri, S., Comai, S., Damiani, E., Fraternali, P., Paraboschi, S., and Tanca L. 1999. XML-GL: A graphical language of querying and restructuring XML documents. In Proceedings of the WWW.
[21]
Chunlan, M., Frankel, H., Beale, T., and Heard S. 2007. EHR query language (EQL): A query language for archetype-based health records. In MEDINFO.
[22]
CKM. Clinical Knowledge Manager. http://www.openehr.org/knowledge/. (Accessed 12/09).
[23]
EHR Standards. Electronic health records standards. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_health_record#Standards. (Accessed 12/09).
[24]
Eichelberg, M., Aden, T., Riesmeier, J., Dogac, A., and Laleci, G. B. 2005. A survey and analysis of electronic healthcare record standards. ACM Comput. Surv. 37, 4, 277--315.
[25]
EUROREC. 2010. European Record Institute. http://www.eurorec.org/.
[26]
GEHR. Good electronic health record project. http://www.gehr.org/.
[27]
Gendron, M. S. and D'Onofrio, M. J. 2001. Data quality in the healthcare industry. Data Quality J. 7, 1.
[28]
Gök, M. 2008. Introducing an openEHR-based electronic health record system in a hospital. Masters thesis, University of Goettingen.
[29]
HL7. Health level 7. www.hl7.org. (Accessed 11/10).
[30]
HL7. CDA. Clinical document architecture. Release 2 http://www.hl7.org/v3ballot/html/infrastructure/cda/cda.htm.
[31]
Hristidis, V. 2009. Data quality and integration issues in EHRs. In Information Discovery on Electronic Health Records, Chapman & Hall, Ch. 4.
[32]
IHTSDO 2009. IHTSDO and openEHR collaboration. http://www.openehr.org/292-OE.html?branch=1&language=1.
[33]
ISO 13606-1. 2008. Health informatics: Electronic health record communication. Part 1: RM (1st Ed.).
[34]
ISO 13606-2. 2008. Health informatics: Electronic health record communication. Part 2: Archetype interchange specification (1st Ed.).
[35]
ISO/TC 215 Technical Report. 2003. Electronic health record definition, scope, and context. (2nd. draft, Aug.).
[36]
Jayapandian, M. and Jagadish, H. V. 2009. Automating the design and construction of query forms. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 21, 10, 1389--1402.
[37]
Kalra, D., Taipuria, A., Freriks, G., Mennerat, F. and Devlies J. 2008. Management and maintenance policies for EHR interoperability resources. Q-REC Project IST 027370 3.3. The European Commission, Brussels.
[38]
Kennelly, R.J. 1998. IEEE 1073, Standard for medical device communications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference (AUTOTESTCON ‘98). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 335--336.
[39]
Kerr, K.A., Norris, T., and Stockdale, R. 2008. The strategic management of data quality in healthcare. Health Inform. J. 14, 259.
[40]
Lee, Y., Strong, D., Kahn, B., and Wang, R. 2002. AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Inform. Manage. 40, 2, 133--146.
[41]
Leslie, H. and Heard S. 2006. Archetypes 101. In Proceedings of the HIC and HINZ. Health Informatics Society of Australia, 18--23.
[42]
Lewis, G. A., Morris, E., Simanta, S., and Wrage, L. 2008. Why standards are not enough to guarantee end-to-end interoperability. In Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference on Composition-based Software Systems. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
[43]
Madnick, S. E., Wang, R. Y., Lee, Y. W., and Zhu, H. 2009. Overview and framework for data and information quality research. ACM J. Data Inf. Quality 1, 1, Article 2.
[44]
Maldonadoa, J. A., Monera, D., Tomása, D., Ánguloa, C., Roblesa, M., and Fernándezb, J. T. 2007. Framework for clinical data standardization based on archetypes. In MEDINFO.
[45]
Microsoft Connected Health Framework. http://www.microsoft.com/industry/healthcare/technology/HealthFrameok.mspx. (Accessed 11/09).
[46]
Miettinen, M. and Korhonen, M. 2008. Information quality in healthcare: Coherence of data compared between organization’s electronic patient records. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
[47]
Mikkelsen, G. and Aasly, J. 2005. Consequences of impaired data quality on information retrieval in electronic patient records. Int. J. Med. Inf. 74, 5, 387--394.
[48]
MOSS8. 2009. Eight Medical Open Source Software Seminar. http://www.openehr.org/293-OE.html?branch=1&language=1.
[49]
NEHTA. 2006. Review of shared electronic health records standards. National E-Health Transition Authority.
[50]
NHIN. 2005. NHIN: Interoperability for the National Health Information Network. IEEE, E-books.
[51]
Ocean Informatics. 2010. http://www.oceaninformatics.com/. (Accessed 1/10).
[52]
OpenEHR Community. http://www.openehr.org/. (Accessed 5/09).
[53]
Orfanidis, L., Bamidis, P.D., and Eaglestone, B. 2004. Data quality issues in electronic health records: An adaptation framework for the Greek health system. Health Inform. J. 10, 1, 23.
[54]
Øvretveit, J. 2003. What are the best strategies for ensuring quality in hospitals? In WHO Regional Office for Europe's Health Evidence Network (HEN).
[55]
Øvretveit, J., Scott, T., Rundall, G. T., Shortell, S. M., and Brommels, M. 2007. Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare. Int. J. Quality Health Care 19, 5, 259--266.
[56]
Patrick, J., Ly, R., and Truran, D. 2006. Evaluation of a persistent store for openEHR. In Proceedings of the HIC and HINZ. Health Informatics Society of Australia, 83--89.
[57]
Pishev, O. 2006. The openEHR advantage. White paper. http://www.oceaninformatics.com/ocean-informatics-resources/ocean-documentation/Published-Articles/The-iopeniEHR-advantage2.html.
[58]
Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., and Kawasumi, Y. 2005. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review. J. Amer. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12, 505--516.
[59]
Rahman, S. A., Bhalla, S., and Hashimoto, T. 2006. Query-by-object Interface for information requirement elicitation in M-commerce. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.
[60]
Sachdeva, S. and Bhalla, S. 2010. Semantic Interoperability in healthcare information for EHR databases. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop, Databases in Networked Information Systems (DNIS). 157--173.
[61]
Sachdeva, S. and Bhalla, S. 2009. Implementing high-level query language interfaces for archetype-based electronic health records database. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data (COMAD). 235--238.
[62]
Silberschatz, A., Korth, H. F., and Sudarshan, S. 2010. Database Systems Concepts 6th Ed., McGraw Hill, New York.
[63]
Simonov, M., Sammartino, L., Ancona, M., Pini, S., Cazzola, W., and Frascio, M. 2005. Information, knowledge and interoperability for healthcare domain. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automated Production of Cross Media Content for Multi-Channel Distribution (AXMEDIS'05). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
[64]
SNOMED. Clinical terms. Systematized nomenclature of medicine. http://www.snomed.org/documents/snomed_overview.pdf.
[65]
Sokolowski, R. 1999. Expressing health care objects in XML. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Enabling Technologies on Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.
[66]
Sun, J. 2003. Information requirement elicitation in M-Commerce: An interactive approach to facilitate information search for mobile users. Comm. ACM 46, 12, 45--47.
[67]
Tayi, G. K. and Ballou, D. P. 1998. Examining data quality. Comm. ACM 41, 2, 54--57.
[68]
The openEHR .Net knowledge tools project. http://www.openehr.org/projects/dotnet.html.
[69]
The openEHR Java reference implementation project. http://www.openehr.org/projects/java.html.
[70]
Thurston, L. M. 2006. Flexible and extensible display of archetyped data: The openEHR presentation challenge. In Proceedings of HIC and HINZ. Health Informatics Society of Australia, 28--36.
[71]
Walker, J., Pan, E., Johnston, D., Adler-Milstein, J., Bates, D.W., and Middleton, B. 2005. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability health affairs.
[72]
http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w5.10.
[73]
Wang, S. J., Middleton, B., Prosser. L. A., Bardon, C. G., Spurr, C. D., Carchidi, P. J., Kittler, A. F., Goldszer, R. C., Fairchild, D. G., Sussman, A. J., Kuperman, G. J., and Bates, D. W. 2003. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Amer. J. Med. 114. 5, 397--403.
[74]
Wang, R. Y. 1998. A product perspective on total data quality management. Comm. ACM 41, 2, 58--65.
[75]
Wang, R. Y. and Strong, D. M. 1996. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 12, 4, 5--33.
[76]
Wang, R. Y., Zaid, M., and Lee, Y. W. 2001. Data Quality, Kluwer, Amsterdam.
[77]
Zloof, M. M. 1975. Query-by-example. In Proceedings of AFIPS'75.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Development of a minimum data set for a blockchain-based personal health records (PHRs), for patient/physician interaction in family medicineJournal of Education and Health Promotion10.4103/jehp.jehp_1180_2313:1Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)Comprehensive Review and Future Research Directions on ICT StandardisationInformation10.3390/info1511069115:11(691)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Plugging and Playing with Variety of Data using Multi-Model Database and Polyglot Persistence2024 Third International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Information and Communication Technologies (ICEEICT)10.1109/ICEEICT61591.2024.10718481(1-8)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Data and Information Quality
Journal of Data and Information Quality  Volume 3, Issue 1
April 2012
54 pages
ISSN:1936-1955
EISSN:1936-1963
DOI:10.1145/2166788
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 May 2012
Accepted: 01 January 2012
Revised: 01 December 2010
Received: 01 January 2010
Published in JDIQ Volume 3, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Electronic health records
  2. archetype-based EHR
  3. data quality in healthcare
  4. openEHR
  5. quality-based EHR
  6. semantic interoperability
  7. standardization in EHR

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)85
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Development of a minimum data set for a blockchain-based personal health records (PHRs), for patient/physician interaction in family medicineJournal of Education and Health Promotion10.4103/jehp.jehp_1180_2313:1Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)Comprehensive Review and Future Research Directions on ICT StandardisationInformation10.3390/info1511069115:11(691)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Plugging and Playing with Variety of Data using Multi-Model Database and Polyglot Persistence2024 Third International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Information and Communication Technologies (ICEEICT)10.1109/ICEEICT61591.2024.10718481(1-8)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2024
  • (2024)A unified component-based data-driven framework to support interoperability in the healthcare systemsHeliyon10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3503610:15(e35036)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2024) PEBS : An efficient patient‐enabled blockchain system Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience10.1002/cpe.8287Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Standard-based personalized healthcare delivery for kidney illness using deep learningPhysiological Measurement10.1088/1361-6579/ace09f44:8(084001)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Patient generated health data and electronic health record integration, governance and socio-technical issues: A narrative reviewInformatics in Medicine Unlocked10.1016/j.imu.2022.10115337(101153)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Effective and feasible interventions to improve structured EHR data registration and exchange: A concept mapping approach and exploration of practical examples in the NetherlandsInternational Journal of Medical Informatics10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105023173(105023)Online publication date: May-2023
  • (2023)A framework for implementing machine learning in healthcare based on the concepts of preconditions and postconditionsHealthcare Analytics10.1016/j.health.2023.1001553(100155)Online publication date: Nov-2023
  • (2022)Artificial Intelligence, Sensors and Vital Health Signs: A ReviewApplied Sciences10.3390/app12221147512:22(11475)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media