skip to main content
10.1145/2168556.2168631acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measuring the performance of gaze and speech for text input

Published:28 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

A popular word processor application was adapted to include the use of eye gaze and speech as a modality for text entry. An onscreen keyboard was used whereby users were expected to focus on the desired character and then issue a verbal command in order to type the character in the document. Measures of speed and accuracy were captured and analyzed. Results indicate that the keyboard is superior to the gaze and speech entry method in terms of both speed and accuracy. Keyboard button sizes and spacing between the buttons did not affect either measure in any way.

References

  1. Anderson, T. 2009. Pro Office 2007 development with VSTO. United States of America: APress. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hansen, J. P., Hansen, D. W. and Johansen, A. S. 2001. Bringing gaze-based interaction back to basics. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.) Universal Access in HCI (UAHCI): Towards an Information Society for All - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII'01), 325--328. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jacob, R. J. K. (1993a). Eye Movement-Based Human-Computer Interaction Techniques: Toward Non-Command Interfaces. In H. R. Hartson and D. Hix (Eds), Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 151--190. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jacob, R. J. K. and Karn, K. S. 2003. Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises (Section Commentary). In J. Hyona, R. Radach and H. Deubel (Eds) The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (pp. 573--605). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. 1976. Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441--480.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Klarlund, N. 2003. Editing by Voice and the Role of Sequential Symbol Systems for Improved Human-to-Computer Information Rates. In Proceedings of ICASSP, Hong Kong, 553--556. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Land, M. F. and Tatler, B. W. 2009. Looking and acting: Vision and eye movements in natural behaviour. United States of America: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Levenshtein, V. I. 1965. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Doklady Akademii Nauk, 163, 845--848.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. MacKenzie, I. S. 2002. A note on calculating text entry speed. Retrieved 14 June 2010 from http://www.yorku.ca/mack/RN-TextEntrySpeed.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. MacKenzie, I. S. and Soukoreff, R. W. 2002. A character-level error analysis technique for evaluating text entry methods. In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2002, Aarhus, Denmark, 243--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. MacKenzie, I. S. and Soukoreff, R. W. 2003. Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -- CHI 2003, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States of America, 754--755. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Maglio, P. P., Matlock, T., Campbell, C. S., Zhai, S. and Smith, B. A. 2000. Gaze and speech in attentive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Advances in Multimodal Interfaces, Vancouver, Canada, 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Majaranta, P. (2009). Text entry by eye gaze. Dissertations in Interactive Technology, number 11, University of Tampere.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Miniotas, D., Špakov, O. and Evreinov, G. 2003. Symbol Creator: An alternative eye-based text entry technique with low demand for screen space. In Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction -- INTERACT '03, Zurich, Switzerland, 137--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Morimoto, C. H. and Amir, A. 2010. Context switching for fast key selection in text entry applications. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA), 271--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Read, J. 2005. On the application of text input metrics to handwritten text input. Text Input Workshop, Dagstuhl, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Read, J., MacFarlane, S. and Casey, C. 2001. Measuring the usability of text input methods for children. In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) 2001, New Orleans, United States of America, 559--572.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Tan, Y. K., Sherkat, N. and Allen, T. 2003. Eye gaze and speech for data entry: A comparison of different data entry methods. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, 41--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Tanaka, K. 1999. A robust selection system using realtime multi-modal user-agent interactions. In Proceedings of IUI'99, 105--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K. and Sedivy, J. 1995. Integration of visual and linguistic information during spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632--1634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Vertanen, K. and MacKay, D. J. C. 2010. Speech Dasher: Fast writing using speech and gaze. In Proceedings of CHI 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America, 595--598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wobbrock, J. O., Rubinstein, J., Sawyer, M. W. and Duchowski, A. T. 2008. Longitudinal evaluation of discrete consecutive gaze gestures for text entry. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA), Savannah, Georgia, United States of America, 11--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Measuring the performance of gaze and speech for text input

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ETRA '12: Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
      March 2012
      420 pages
      ISBN:9781450312219
      DOI:10.1145/2168556

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 March 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate69of137submissions,50%

      Upcoming Conference

      ETRA '24
      The 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
      June 4 - 7, 2024
      Glasgow , United Kingdom

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader