skip to main content
10.1145/2181037.2181055acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Intelligent ambient technology: friend or foe?

Published:28 September 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a part of findings from a study carried out to gain insight on user understanding of smart environments and preferred ways and places for interaction with smart services therein. Here we concentrate on qualitative interview data discussing the concept of intelligence with regard to technology and the participants' perceptions of it. Such understanding of potential users' expectations is critical in developing novel technologies and launching the first services based on it. Furthermore, naming the offered technology or service smart or intelligent might give wrong impressions of its capabilities, thus leading to experiences of worry or disappointment. The main finding is that the participants understood "intelligence" to mean different things, which are usually related to their own needs or technological novelty. In addition, an intelligent system and ability to act proactively raised concerns of loss of control.

References

  1. www.m-w.com, accessed 5.8.2011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hornby, A. S (ed.). 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wechsler, D. 1944. The Measurement of Adult Intelligence. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gotfredson, L. 1998. The General Intelligence Factor. Scientific American Presents 9, 4, 24--29. http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1998generalintelligencefactor.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Satyanarayanan, M. 2001. Pervasive Computing: Vision and Challenges, IEEE Pers. Comm, 10--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Weiser, M.. 1991. The Computer for the 21st Century, Scientific American 265, 3, 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hermann, F., Blach, R., Janssen, D., Klein, T., Schuller, A., and Spath, D. 2009. Challenges for user centered smart environments. In: Human-Computer Interaction. Ambient, Ubiquitous and Intelligent Interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Aarts, E., Harwig, R., and Schuurmans, M. 2001. Ambient intelligence. In: The Invisible Future: The Seamless Integration Of Technology Into Everyday Life. McGraw-Hill Companies. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kynsilehto, M., Olsson, T., and Niemelä, M. Issues on user acceptance and experience in smart interoperability environments. In proceedings of 14th MindTrek Conference (Tampere, Finland, October 6--7, 2010). ACM, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tamez, E., Myerson, J. and Hale, S. 2008. Learning, working memory, and intelligence revisited. Behavioural processes 78, 240--245.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J., and Nolen-Hoeksema, S. 1996. Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology. London: Harcourt College Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardner, H. 1993. Multiple Intelligence: The Theory in Practice. N. Y: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Flynn, J. R. 1994. IQ gains over time. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human intelligence. New York: Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Taylor, A. S. Machine intelligence. In Proceedings of CHI 2009 (Boston, Massachusetts, USA, April 4 -- 9, 2009). ACM, NY.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Feng-hsiung, H. 2002. Behind Deep Blue: Building the Computer that Defeated the World Chess Champion. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Breazeal, C. 2003. Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. Int J Hum Comp Std 59, 1--2, 119--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kaplan, F. and Oudeyer, P.-Y. 2007. Intrinsically motivated machines. In Lungarella, M., Iida, F., Bongard, J. and Pfeider, R. (Eds.), Intrinsically Motivated Machines. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Haykin, S. 1999. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Turing, A. M. 1950. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, 433--460Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Weizenbaum, J. 1966. ELIZA - A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM 9, 36--45. DOI=10.1145/365153.365168 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Forlizzi, J. and DiSalvo, C. 2007. Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the Roomba vacuum in the home. In the Proceedings of CHI'07 (San Jose, California, USA, April 28 --- May 3). ACM, NY.. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. 1996. The Media Equation: How People treat computers, television and new media like real people and places. CSLI publications. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Dey, A., Abowd, G., and Wood, A. 1999. CyberDesk: a framework for providing self-integrating context-aware services. Knowledge-Based Systems, 11, 3--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Dey, A. 2001. Understanding and using context. Personal and Ubiquituos Computing 5 (Feb. 2001), 4--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pascoe, J. 1998. Adding generic contextual capabilities to wearable computers. In 2nd International Symposium on Wearable Computers, (Pittsburgh, PA, USA, October 1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Korkea-aho, M. 2001. Location Information in the Internet. Licentiate's thesis. Helsinki University of Technology. 80 pp., Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Gong, L. 2008. How social is responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1494--1509. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Intelligent ambient technology: friend or foe?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MindTrek '11: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments
      September 2011
      341 pages
      ISBN:9781450308168
      DOI:10.1145/2181037

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 September 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader