skip to main content
10.1145/2181101.2181110acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesprofesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cloud computing adoption assessment model (CAAM)

Published:20 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cloud Computing (Clouds) is a new trend in IT, not yet widely adopted by large-scale organisations extensive IT infrastructure and complex IT processes as they find it difficult to adopt Clouds. There are technical and socio-technical challenges that need to be addressed before adoption. There is a need for an assessment framework that would assist adoption by evaluating the organisation, its key capabilities and processes affected by Clouds. The objective of this research study is to develop a model that helps organisations in assessing and improving their readiness for Cloud Computing. Primary data in this research are user concerns and issues that are barrier in the adoption of Clouds.

The primary data will be collected using Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology. Interviews with senior executives and IT Managers are planned to validate the findings of the SLR. The anticipated outcome of this project will be Cloud Computing Adoption Assessment Model (CAAM) that will help organisations to adopt and integrate Clouds with Enterprise IT, define new capabilities, identify their organisational readiness and provide strategies for successful adoption. The case study method will be used for evaluating CAAM in conjunction with organisations willing to adopt cloud computing. Three case studies are planned to evaluate the effectiveness of CAAM in assessing organisation's readiness for the adoption of Cloud Computing.

References

  1. Amoako-Gyampah, K. and Salam, A. F. 2004. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management 41, 731--745. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I. and Zaharia, M. 2010. A view of cloud computing. Commun. ACM 53, 50--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M. and Khalil, M. 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software 80, 571--583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chen, R. 1996. Technological Expansion: the Interaction Between Diversification Strategy and Organizational Capability. Journal of Management Studies 33, 649--666.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Creeger, M. 2009. CTO Roundtable: Cloud Computing. Queue 7, 1--2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Damanpour, F. and Schneider, M. 2006. Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers1. British Journal of Management 17, 215--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Feeny, D. F. and Willcocks, L. P. 1998. Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Review 39, 9--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Feuerlicht, G., Snášel, V., Szczepaniak, P., Abraham, A. and Kacprzyk, J. 2010. Next Generation SOA: Can SOA Survive Cloud Computing? In Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering - 2 Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 19--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Heinle, C. and Strebel, J. 2010. IaaS adoption determinants in enterprises. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Economics of grids, clouds, systems, and services, Ischia, Italy 2010 Springer-Verlag, 93--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Henry, E. S. 2009. X as a Service, Cloud Computing, and the Need for Good Judgment, IT Professional 11, 4--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Khajeh-Hosseini, A., Greenwood, D. and Sommerville, I. 2010. Cloud Migration: A Case Study of Migrating an Enterprise IT System to IaaS. In 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 2010 IEEE 450--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kim, W. 2009. Cloud Computing: Today and Tomorrow. Journal of Object Technology 8, 66--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kim, W., Kim, S. D., Lee, E. and Lee, S. 2009. Adoption issues for cloud computing. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications Services, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 2009 ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kitchenham, B. and Charters, S. 2007. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. EBSE Technical Reports.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Leavitt, N. 2009. Is Cloud Computing Really Ready for Prime Time? Computer 42, 15--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. McKinsey & Co. 2009. Clearing the air on cloud computing McKinsey and Co. USAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Misra, S. C. and Mondal, A. 2010. Identification of a company's suitability for the adoption of cloud computing and modelling its corresponding Return on Investment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling In Press, Corrected Proof. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Morgan, D. L. and Spanish, M. T. 1984. Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology 7, 253--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Mulrow, C. D. 1994. Rationale For Systematic Reviews. BMJ: British Medical Journal 309, 597--599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. NIST 2009. Draft NIST Working Definition of Cloud Computing Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ranganathan, C. and Balaji, S. 2007. Critical Capabilities for Offshore Outsourcing of Information Systems. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S. and Budgen, D. 2010. Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology 52, 463--479. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Xin, M. and Levina, N. 2008. Software-as-a Service Model: Elaborating Client-Side Adoption Factors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Sysytems ICIS, Paris 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yanosky, R. 2008 From Users to Choosers: The Cloud and the Changing Shape of Enterprise Authority. In The Tower and the Cloud, EDUCASE, 126--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Yin, R. 2002. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Third Edition, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol 5. Sage Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cloud computing adoption assessment model (CAAM)

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        Profes '11: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement
        June 2011
        159 pages
        ISBN:9781450307833
        DOI:10.1145/2181101

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 June 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader