skip to main content
10.1145/2187836.2187915acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Joint relevance and freshness learning from clickthroughs for news search

Published: 16 April 2012 Publication History

Abstract

In contrast to traditional Web search, where topical relevance is often the main selection criterion, news search is characterized by the increased importance of freshness. However, the estimation of relevance and freshness, and especially the relative importance of these two aspects, are highly specific to the query and the time when the query was issued. In this work, we propose a unified framework for modeling the topical relevance and freshness, as well as their relative importance, based on click logs. We use click statistics and content analysis techniques to define a set of temporal features, which predict the right mix of freshness and relevance for a given query. Experimental results on both historical click data and editorial judgments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

References

[1]
D. Agarwal, B.-C. Chen, P. Elango, and X. Wang. Click shaping to optimize multiple objectives. In KDD, 2011.
[2]
E. Agichtein, E. Brill, S. Dumais, and R. Ragno. Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences. In SIGIR, 2006.
[3]
R. Baeza-Yates, B. Ribeiro-Neto, et al. Modern information retrieval, volume 463. ACM press New York, 1999.
[4]
S. Brin and L. Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer networks and ISDN systems, 30(1--7):107--117, 1998.
[5]
Z. Cao, T. Qin, T. Liu, M. Tsai, and H. Li. Learning to rank: from pairwise approach to listwise approach. In ICML, pages 129--136. ACM, 2007.
[6]
H. Chernoff and E. Lehmann. The use of maximum likelihood estimates in $\chi$2 tests for goodness of fit. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, pages 579--586, 1954.
[7]
N. Dai, M. Shokouhi, and B. D. Davison. Learning to rank for freshness and relevance. In SIGIR, pages 95--104, 2011.
[8]
A. Dong, Y. Chang, Z. Zheng, G. Mishne, J. Bai, R. Zhang, K. Buchner, C. Liao, and F. Diaz. Towards recency ranking in web search. In WSDM, pages 11--20, 2010.
[9]
A. Dong, R. Zhang, P. Kolari, J. Bai, F. Diaz, Y. Chang, Z. Zheng, and H. Zha. Time is of the essence: improving recency ranking using twitter data. In WWW, 2010.
[10]
M. Efron and G. Golovchinsky. Estimation methods for ranking recent information. In SIGIR, pages 495--504, 2011.
[11]
H. Fang, T. Tao, and C. Zhai. A formal study of information retrieval heuristics. In SIGIR, 2004.
[12]
K. J\"arvelin and J. Kek\"al\"ainen. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM TOIS, 20(4):422--446, 2002.
[13]
T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In KDD, pages 133--142, 2002.
[14]
T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In SIGIR, pages 154--161, 2005.
[15]
K. Jones, S. Walker, and S. Robertson. A probabilistic model of information retrieval: development and comparative experiments. Information Processing and Management, 36(6):779--808, 2000.
[16]
N. Kanhabua and K. Nørvåg. Determining time of queries for re-ranking search results. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pages 261--272, 2010.
[17]
A. Kulkarni, J. Teevan, K. Svore, and S. Dumais. Understanding temporal query dynamics. In WSDM, 2011.
[18]
L. Li, W. Chu, J. Langford, and X. Wang. Unbiased offline evaluation of contextual-bandit-based news article recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM WSDM '11, pages 297--306, 2011.
[19]
X. Li and W. Croft. Time-based language models. In CIKM, pages 469--475, 2003.
[20]
T. Liu. Learning to rank for information retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 3(3):225--331, 2009.
[21]
T. Moon, L. Li, W. Chu, C. Liao, Z. Zheng, and Y. Chang. Online learning for recency search ranking using real-time user feedback. In CIKM, pages 1501--1504, 2010.
[22]
G. Salton and M. McGill. Introduction to modern information retrieval. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1986.
[23]
K. M. Svore, M. N. Volkovs, and C. J. Burges. Learning to rank with multiple objective functions. In WWW, 2011.
[24]
C. Zhai and J. Lafferty. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 334--342, 2001.
[25]
Z. Zheng, K. Chen, G. Sun, and H. Zha. A regression framework for learning ranking functions using relative relevance judgments. In SIGIR, pages 287--294, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Learning to Rank for Educational Search EnginesIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2021.307519614:2(211-225)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021
  • (2021)Content and link-structure perspective of ranking webpagesComputer Science Review10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.10039740:COnline publication date: 1-May-2021
  • (2019)Correcting for Recency Bias in Job RecommendationProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3357384.3358131(2185-2188)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Joint relevance and freshness learning from clickthroughs for news search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '12: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
    April 2012
    1078 pages
    ISBN:9781450312295
    DOI:10.1145/2187836
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Univ. de Lyon: Universite de Lyon

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 April 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. learning to rank
    2. relevance and freshness modeling
    3. temporal features

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WWW 2012
    Sponsor:
    • Univ. de Lyon
    WWW 2012: 21st World Wide Web Conference 2012
    April 16 - 20, 2012
    Lyon, France

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Learning to Rank for Educational Search EnginesIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2021.307519614:2(211-225)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021
    • (2021)Content and link-structure perspective of ranking webpagesComputer Science Review10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.10039740:COnline publication date: 1-May-2021
    • (2019)Correcting for Recency Bias in Job RecommendationProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3357384.3358131(2185-2188)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2019
    • (2018)Time-Aware Novelty Metrics for Recommender SystemsAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_27(357-370)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018
    • (2016)Learning Hidden Features for Contextual BanditsProceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/2983323.2983847(1633-1642)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2016
    • (2015)Predicting Online Performance of News Recommender Systems Through Richer Evaluation MetricsProceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/2792838.2800184(179-186)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2015
    • (2015)Going In-DepthProceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/2783258.2788599(2109-2118)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2015
    • (2015)FRel: A Freshness Language Model for Optimizing Real-Time Web SearchIntelligent Systems in Cybernetics and Automation Theory10.1007/978-3-319-18503-3_21(207-216)Online publication date: 2015

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media