skip to main content
10.1145/2187980.2188267acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

"Making sense of it all": an attempt to aid journalists in analysing and filtering user generated content

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 April 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This position paper explores how journalists can embrace new ways of content provision and authoring, by aggregating and analyzing content gathered from Social Media. Current challenges in the news media industry are reviewed and a new system for capturing emerging knowledge from Social Media is described. Novel features that assist professional journalists in processing sheer amounts of Social Media information are presented with a reference to the technical requirements of the system. First implementation steps are also discussed, particularly focusing in event detection and user influence identification.

References

  1. A. Stuart. "Citizen Journalism and the Rise of "Mass Self-Communication": Reporting the London Bombings". In Global Media Journal, Australian Edition, 1(1), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. G. Brandstetter, and P. Hörschinger. "Journalism and Social Media". ikp PR and Lobbying GmbH, Vienna, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Newman. "The rise of social media and its impact on mainstream journalism: A study of how newspapers and broadcasters in the UK and US are responding to a wave of participatory social media, and a historic shift in control towards individual consumers", Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Sizov. "GeoFolk: Latent Spatial Semantics in Web 2.0 Social Media". 3rd ACM Int'l Conf Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), New York, USA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Siebes, J. Vreeken, M. van Leeuwen. "Compression based frequent items set mining. Item sets that compress". In SDM 2006, pp. 393--404, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Papadopoulos, C. Zigkolis, Y. Kompatsiaris, A. Vakali. "Cluster-based Landmark and Event Detection on Tagged Photo Collections". IEEE Multimedia Magazine 18(1), pp. 52--63, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Yang, J. Leskovec. "Modeling Information Diffusion in Implicit Networks". IEEE Int'l Conf. On Data Mining, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Nadeau, S. Satoshi. "A survey of named entity recognition and classification". Linguisticae Investigationes 30(1), pp. 3--26, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. V. Carchiolo, A. Longheu, M. Malgeri. "Reliable peers and useful resources: Searching for the best personalised learning path in a trust- and recommendation-aware environment". Inf. Sci. 180(10), pp. 1893--1907, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Brenner and E. Izquierdo." Mediaeval benchmark: Social event detection in collaborative photo collections". In Larson et al. Working Notes Proceedings of the MediaEval 2011 Workshop, Pisa, Italy, Sep 1--2, 2011, volume 807 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Papadopoulos, C. Zigkolis, Y. Kompatsiaris, and A. Vakali. "Certh @ mediaeval 2011 social event detection task". In Larson et al. Working Notes Proceedings of the MediaEval 2011 Workshop, Pisa, Italy, Sep 1--2, 2011, volume 807 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. "Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors". In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, pages 851--860. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Weng and B.S. Lee. Event detection in twitter. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H. Sayyadi, M. Hurst, and A. Maykov. "Event detection and tracking in social streams". In E. Adar, M. Hurst, T. Finin, N. S. Glance, N. Nicolov, and B.L. Tseng, editors, ICWSM. The AAAI Press, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Wasserman, K. Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. K. Saito, M. Kimura, K. Ohara, and H. Motoda. Discovery of super-mediators of information diffusion in social networks. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Discovery science, DS'10, pages 144--158, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Tang, J. Sun, C. Wang, and Z. Yang. Social influence analysis in large-scale networks. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '09, pages 807--816, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. "Making sense of it all": an attempt to aid journalists in analysing and filtering user generated content

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '12 Companion: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web
      April 2012
      1250 pages
      ISBN:9781450312301
      DOI:10.1145/2187980

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 April 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader