skip to main content
10.1145/220279.220314acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Efficient randomized algorithms for some geometric optimization problems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 September 1995Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.P. Agarwal, B. Aronov and M. Sharir, Computing lower envelopes in four dimensions with applications, Proc. l Oth Annual Symp. on Computational Geometry, 1994, 348-358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.P. Agarwal, O. Schwarzkopf and M. Sharir, The overlay of lower envelopes in three dimensions and its applications, this proceedings. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.P. Agarwal, M. Shark, and S. Toledo, New applications of parametric searching in computational geometry, J. Algorithms 17 (1994), 292-318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.A. Aggarwal and S. Suri, The biggest diagonal in a simple polygon, Inf. Proc. Letters 35 (1990), 13-18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.H. BrSnnimann and B. Chazelle, Optimal slope selection via cuttings, Proc. 6th Canadian Conf. on Computational Geometry, 1994, 99-103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.B. Chazelle, H. Edelsbrunner, L. Guibas, and M. Sharir, Diameter, width, closest line pair, and parametric searching, Discrete Comput. Geom. 10 (1993), 183-196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.B. ChazeUe, H. Edelsbrunner, L. Guibas, and M. Sharir, A singly exponential stratification scheme for real semi-algebraic varieties and its applications, Proc. 16th Int. Colloq. on Automata, Languages and Programming, (1989), 179-192. Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, vol. 371, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. (Also in Theoretical Computer Science 84 (~99x), 77-~05.) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.B. Chazelle and M. Sharir, An algorithm for generalized point location and its applications, J. Symbolic Computation 10 (1990), 281-309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.K. Clarkson, H. Edelsbrunner, L. Guibas, M. Sharir and E. Welzl, Combinatorial complexity bounds for arrangements of curves and spheres, Discrete Cornput. Geom. 5 (1990), 99-160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.K. Clarkson and P. Shot, Applications of random sampling in computational geometry II, Discrete Comput. Geom. 4 (1989), 387-421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.M. Dillencourt, D. Mount, and N. Netanyahu, A randomized algorithm for slope selection, int. J. Comput. Geom. and Appls 2 (1992), 1-27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.M. de Berg, K. Dobrindt, and O. Schwarzkopf, On lazy randomized incremental construction, Proc. 26th Annual ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, 1994, 105-114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.M. de Berg, D. Halperin, and L. Guibas, Vertical decomposition for triangles in 3-space, Proc. l Oth Annual Syrup. Computational Geometry, 1994, 1-10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.H. Ebara, N. Fukuyama, H. Nakano, and Y. Nakanishi, Roundness algorithms using the Voronoi diagrams, First Canadian Conf. on Computational Geometry, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.D. Halperin and M. Sharir, New bounds for lower envelopes in 3 dimensions, with applications to visibility in terrains, Discrete Comput. Geom. 12 (1994), 313-326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.D. Haussler and E. Welzl, e-nets and simplex range queries, Discrete Comput. Geom. 2 (1987), 127-151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.M. Houle and G. Toussaint, Computing the width of a set, IEEE 2kansactions on Pattern Anal. and Mach. Intell. 5 (1988), 761-765. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.M. Katz and M. Shark, Optimal slope selection via expanders, Inf. Proc. Letters 47 (1993), 115-122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.M. Katz and M. Sharir, An expander-based approach to geometric optimization, Proc. 9th Annual $ymp. on Computational Geometry, 1993, 198-207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.J. Matou~ek, Randomized optimal algorithm for slope selection, Info. Proc. Letters 39 (1991), 183- 187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.N. Megiddo, Applying parallel computation algorithms in the design of serial algorithms, J. A CM 30 (1983), 852-865. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.M. Sharir, Almost tight upper bounds for lower envelopes in higher dimensions, Discrete Comput. Geom. 12 (1994), 327-345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.M. Shark and P. Agarwal, Davenport-Schinzel Sequences and Their Geometric Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-New York- Melbourne, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.M. Staid and R. Janardan, On the width and roundness of a set of points in the plane, manascript, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Efficient randomized algorithms for some geometric optimization problems

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  SCG '95: Proceedings of the eleventh annual symposium on Computational geometry
                  September 1995
                  456 pages
                  ISBN:0897917243
                  DOI:10.1145/220279
                  • Chairman:
                  • Jack Snoeyink

                  Copyright © 1995 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 September 1995

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  SCG '95 Paper Acceptance Rate59of129submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader