skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208311acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The search dashboard: how reflection and comparison impact search behavior

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most searchers do not know how to use Web search engines as effectively as possible. This is due, in part, to search engines not providing feedback about how search behavior can be improved. Because feedback is an essential part of learning, we created the Search Dashboard, which provides an interface for reflection on personal search behavior. The Dashboard aggregates and presents an individual's search history and provides comparisons with that of archetypal expert profiles. Via a five-week study of 90 Search Dash-board users, we find that users are able to change aspects of their behavior to be more in line with that of the presented expert searchers. We also find that reflection can be beneficial, even without comparison, by changing participants' views about their own search skills, what is possible with search, and what aspects of their behavior may influence search success. Our findings demonstrate a new way for search engines to help users modify their search behavior for positive outcomes.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paperfile236-3.mp4

mp4

8.2 MB

References

  1. Aula, A., Khan, R.M. & Guan, Z. How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult? Proc. CHI, 2010, 35--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aula, A. & Nordhausen, K. Modeling successful performance in web searching. JASIST 57, 12 (2006), 1678--1693. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Aula, A., Jhaveri, N. & Kaki, M. Information search and re-access strategies of experienced Web users. Proc. WWW, 583--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, P., Svore, K. & Dumais, S. Classificationenhanced ranking. Proc. WWW, 2010, 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I. & Vermetten, Y. Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, (2005), 487--508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Boud, D., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. Routledge, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, A., Brown, J.S. & Newman, S.E. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. Knowing, Learning and Instruction 8, 1 (1989), 453--494.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Consolvo, S., McDonald, D. & Landay, J. Theory-driven design strategies for technologies that support behavior change in everyday life. Proc. CHI, 2009, 405--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dou, Z., Song, R. & Wen, J. A large-scale evaluation and analysis of personalized search strategies. Proc. WWW, 2007, 581--590. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Evans, B. M. & Chi, E.H. An elaborated model of social search. IP&M, 46, 6 (2010), 656--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fogg, B.J. Motivating, influencing, and persuading users. In The human-computer interaction handbook, Julie A. Jacko and Andrew Sears (Eds.). L., (2002), 358--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L. & Landay, J. The design of eco-feedback technology. Proc. CHI, 2010, 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hölscher, C. & Strube, G. Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks 33, (2000), 337--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Khan, K. & Locatis, C. Searching through the cyberspace: the effects of link display and link density on information retrieval from hypertext on the World Wide Web. JASIST, 49, 2 (1998), 176--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kodagoda, N. & Wong, B.L.W. Effects of low and high literacy on user performance in information search and retrieval. Proc. BCS-HCI, 2008, 173--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lazonder, A.W., Biemans, H.J.A. & Worpeis, I.G.J.H. Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web. JASIST 51, 6 (2000), 576--581. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Li, I., Forlizzi, J. & Dey, A. Know thyself: monitoring and reflecting on facets of one's life. Proc. CHI EA, 2010, 4489--4492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Moraveji, N., Morris, M.R., Morris, D., Czerwinski, M. & Riche, N. ClassSearch: Facilitating the development of web search skills through social learning. Proc. CHI, 2011, 1797--1806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Moraveji, N., Russell, D., Bien, J. & Mease, D. Measuring improvement in user search performance resulting from optimal search tips. Proc. SIGIR, 2011, 355--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Morris, D., Morris, M.R. & Venolia, G. SearchBar: a search-centric web history for task resumption and information re-finding. Proc. CHI, 2008, 1207--1216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nielsen, J. Incompetent research skills curb users' problem solving. Alertbox. April 11, 2011. (available at: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/search-skills.html)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Saito, H. & Miwa, K. A cognitive study of information seeking processes in the WWW: Effects of searcher's knowledge and experience. Proc. WISE, 2001, 321--333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sparck-Jones, K. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation 28, 1 (1972), 11--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Thaler, R.H. & Sunstein, C.R. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Van Kleek, M., Moore, B., Xu, C., & Karger, D.R. Eyebrowse: Real-time web activity sharing and visualization. Proc. CHI EA, 2010, 3643--3648. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. White, R.W. and Morris, D. Investigating the querying and browsing behavior of advanced search engine users. Proc. SIGIR, 2007, 255--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. White, R.W., Bilenko, M., and Cucerzan, S. Studying the use of popular destinations to enhance web search Interaction. Proc. of SIGIR, 2007, 159--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. White, R.W., Dumais, S., and Teevan, J. Characterizing the influence of domain expertise on web search behavior. Proc. WSDM, 2009, 132--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The search dashboard: how reflection and comparison impact search behavior

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader