skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208410acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding experts' and novices' expertise judgment of twitter users

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Judging topical expertise of micro-blogger is one of the key challenges for information seekers when deciding which information sources to follow. However, it is unclear how useful different types of information are for people to make expertise judgments and to what extent their background knowledge influences their judgments. This study explored differences between experts and novices in inferring expertise of Twitter users. In three conditions, participants rated the level of expertise of users after seeing (1) only the tweets, (2) only the contextual information including short biographical and user list information, and (3) both tweets and contextual information. Results indicated that, in general, contextual information provides more useful information for making expertise judgment of Twitter users than tweets. While the addition of tweets seems to make little difference, or even add nuances to novices' expertise judgment, experts' judgments were improved when both content and contextual information were presented.

References

  1. Canini, K. R., Suh, B., & Pirolli, P. L. (2011). Finding credible sources in Twitter based on relevance and social structure. In Proc. SocialCom 2011 (In Press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N.. Hoffman, R. & Fltovich. P., The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pal, A., Counts, S. Identifying Topical Authorities in Microblogs. In Proc. WSDM 2011, ACM Press (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T, The Elaboration Likelyihood Model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19. 123--205 (1986).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Weng, J., Lim, E., Jiang, J., He, Q., TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers, In Proc. WSDM 2010, ACM Press. 261--270 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding experts' and novices' expertise judgment of twitter users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader