skip to main content
research-article

A full lifecycle performance verification methodology for multicore systems-on-chip

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 July 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Multicore Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC) are comprised of a rich set of processor cores, specialized hardware accelerators, and I/O interfaces. Functional verification of these complex designs is a critical and demanding task, however, focusing only on functional verification is very risky because the motivation for building such systems in the first place is to achieve high levels of system throughput. Therefore a functionally correct MCSoC that does not exhibit sufficient performance will fail in the market. In addition, limiting performance verification efforts to analyzing individual system components in isolation is insufficient due to: (1) the degree of system-level resource contention that an application domain imposes on the MCSoC, and (2) the degree of configuration flexibility that is typically afforded by an MCSoC. These factors motivate system-level performance verification of MCSoC. This article presents an important industrial case study of MCSoC performance verification involving both pre- and postsilicon analysis, highlighting the methodology used, the lessons learned, and recommendations for improvement.

References

  1. Bell, S., Edwards, B., Amann, J., Conlin, R., Joyce, K., Leung, V., Mackay, J., Reif, M., Bao, L., Brown, J., Mattina, M., Miao, C. C., Ramey, C., Wentzlaff, D., Anderson, W., Berger, E., Fairbanks, N., Khan, D., Montenegro, F., Stickney, J., and Zook, J. 2008. Tile64 processor: A 64-core SoC with mesh interconnect. In Proceedings of the International Solid State Circuits Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhatia, L., Gaur, J., Tiwari, P., Mitra, R. S., and Matange, S. H. 2007. Leveraging semi-formal and sequential equivalence techniques for multimedia SoC performance validation. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC'07). 69--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Black, B. and Shen, J. P. 1998. Calibration of microprocessor performance models. IEEE Comput. 31, 59--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chakraborty, S., Liu, Y., Stoimenov, N., Thiele, L., and Wandeler, E. 2006. Interface-Based rate analysis of embedded systems. In Proceedings of the 27th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium. 25--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chiou, D., Sunjeliwala, H., Sunwoo, D., Xu, J., and Patil, N. 2006. FPGA-Based fast, cycle-accurate, full-system simulators. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Architecture Research Using FPGA Platforms.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Freescale Semiconductor. 2008. P4080 product summary page. http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code+P4080.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Geer, D. 2005. Chip makers turn to multicore processors. IEEE Comput. 38, 11--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hangal, S. and O'Connor, M. 1999. Performance analysis and validation of the picoJava processor. IEEE Micro 19, 66--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Henia, R., Hamann, A., Jersak, M., Racu, R., Richter, K., and Ernst, R. 2005. System level performance analysis: The SymTA/S approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computers and Digital Techniques. 148--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Holt, J., Dastidar, J., Lindberg, D., Pape, J., and Yang, P. 2009. System-Level performance verification of multicore systems-on-chip. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Microprocessor Test and Verification. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Iyengar, V., Xiong, J., Venkatesan, S., Zolotov, V., Lackey, D., Habitz, P., and Visweswariah, C. 2007. Variation-Aware performance verification using at-speed structural test and statistical timing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Desigin (ICCAD'07). 405--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Karn, T., Rawat, S., Kirkpatrick, D., Roy, R., Spirakis, G. S., Sherwani, N., and Peterson, C. 2000. EDA challenges facing future microprocessor design. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circ. Syst., 1498--1506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kumar, J., Strader, N., Freeman, J., and Miller, M. 1995. Emulation verification of the Motorola 68060. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI in Computers and Processors. 150--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lu, P., Jih-Kwon, P., Prakash, T. K., Yen-Kuang, C., and Koppelman, D. 2007. Memory performance and scalability of Intel's and AMD's dual-core processors: A case study. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Performance, Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC'07). 55--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Madi, G., Pasricha, S., Dutt, N., and Abdelwahed, S. 2009. Cross-Abstraction functional verification and performance analysis of chip multiprocessor designs. IEEE Trans. Indust. Inf. 5, 241--256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. McVoy, L. and Staelin, C. 2012. IMbench: Portable tools for performance analysis. Citeseerx.ist.psu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Njoroge, N., Casper, J., Wee, S., Teslyar, Y., Ge, D., Kozyrakis, C., and Olukotun, K. 2007. ATLAS: A chip-multiprocessor with transactional memory support. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition (DATE'07). 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Paulin, P. G., Pilkington, C., and Bensoudane, E. 2002. StepNP: A system-level exploration platform for network processors. IEEE Des. Test Comput. 19, 17--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pham, D. C., Aipperspach, T., Boerstler, D., Bolliger, M., Chaudry, R., Cox, D., Harvey, P., Harvey, P. M., Hofstee, P., Johns, C., Kahle, J., Kameyama, A., Keaty, J., Masubuchi, Y., Pham, M., Pille, J., Posluszny, S., Riley, M., Stasiak, M., Suzuoki, M., Takahashi, O., Warnock, J., Weitzel, S., Wendel, D., and Yazawa, K. 2006. Overview of the architecture, circuit design, and physical implementation of a first-generation cell processor. IEEE J. Solid State Circ. 41, 179--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Pimentel, A. D., Hertzbetger, L. O., Lieverse, P., van der Wolf, P., and Deprettere, E. E. 2001. Exploring embedded-systems architectures with Artemis. Comput. 34, 57--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Richter, K., Jersak, M., and Ernst, R. 2003. A formal approach to MPSoC performance verification. IEEE Comput. 36, 60--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rose, P. 1998. Performance test case generation for microprocessors. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium. 54--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rose, P. and Abraham, J. 2000. Performance and functional verification of microprocessors. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on VLSI Design. 58--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Staschulat, J., Ernst, R., Schulze, A., and Wolf, F. 2005. Context sensitive performance analysis of automotive applications. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition (DATE'05). 165--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Van Stralen, P. and Pimentel, A. D. 2010. A trace-based scenario database for high-level simulation of multimedia MPSoCs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Computer Systems. 11--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wieferink, A., Kogel, T., Leupers, R., Ascheid, G., Meyr, H., Braun, G., and Nohl, A. 2004. A system level processor/communication co-exploration methodology for multi-processor system-on-chip platforms. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition (DATE'04). 1256--1261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A full lifecycle performance verification methodology for multicore systems-on-chip

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
      ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems  Volume 17, Issue 3
      Special section on verification challenges in the concurrent world
      June 2012
      377 pages
      ISSN:1084-4309
      EISSN:1557-7309
      DOI:10.1145/2209291
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Accepted: 1 September 2012
      • Published: 5 July 2012
      • Received: 1 April 2011
      Published in todaes Volume 17, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader